SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ý                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11c or Section 240.14a-12

Cincinnati Bell Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

No fee required.

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

(5)

Total fee paid:


¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:




Cincinnati Bell Inc.

221 East Fourth Street

Cincinnati, Ohio  45202


March 24, 2017

August 11, 2020

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the virtual 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Cincinnati Bell Inc. (“the Annual Meeting”) to be held online via live webcast at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 4, 2017, atSeptember 24, 2020.  There will not be a physical meeting location.  The Annual Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CBB2020AM, where you will be able to participate in the Queen City Club, 331 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio.

meeting live and vote online.  Please note that you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.  We have chosen to hold a virtual, rather than in-person, meeting in light of public health concerns associated with the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) situation.

This booklet includes the formal notice of the meetingAnnual Meeting as well as the proxy statement. The proxy statement gives you information about the formal items of business to be voted on at the meetingAnnual Meeting and other information relevant to your voting decisions.

We are providing our shareholders access to the proxy materials and our 20162019 annual report overvia the internet.  This allows us to provide you with the annual meetingAnnual Meeting information you need in a fast and efficient manner while reducing the environmental impact of our annual meeting.the Annual Meeting.  On or about March 24, 2017,August 11, 2020 we will mail to shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement and 20162019 annual report online and how to vote online.on line.  If you receive such a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the materials unless you specifically request one.  However, theThe Notice contains instructions on how to request printed copies of these materials and a proxy card by mail.

Your vote is very important to us.Regardless of the number of shares you own, please vote. You can vote your shares by internet, toll-free telephone call, or if you request that the proxy materials be mailed to you, by completing, signing and returning the proxy card enclosed with thosethe printed copy of these materials. Please see page 2 of the proxy statement for more detailed information about your voting options.


Very truly yours,

philliprcoxsignaturea02.jpg
Phillip R. Cox

Lynn A. Wentworth

Chairman of the Board



Notice of 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders


Time and Date:

11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, Thursday, May 4, 2017September 24, 2020


Place:

Place:Queen City Club

Virtual meeting via online webcast

331 East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio

Matters to be Voted upon:

Election as directors of the nineten nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement for one-year terms expiring at the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

Recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers' compensation;

Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers' compensation;

Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors;

Ratification of our Audit and Finance Committee's appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017;2020; and

Any other business properly brought before the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.


Record Date:

March 6, 2017

July 27, 2020

Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on this date are entitled to vote.




Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, Annual Meeting via online webcast, we encourage you to vote as promptly as possible by the internet or by telephone.  If you request a printed copy of the proxy materials, you may complete and return by mail the proxy or voting instruction card you will receive in response to your request, or you can vote by the internet or by telephone.  If you attend the meetingAnnual Meeting via online webcast and wish to change your vote, you can do so by voting in person atelectronically during the meeting.


Annual Meeting.


connievogtsigntuarev1.jpg

 

Connie M. Vogt

Corporate Secretary



Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The annual meeting2020 Annual Meeting of shareholdersShareholders of Cincinnati Bell Inc. ("Cincinnati Bell", "we", "our", "us", or the "Company") will be held online via webcast at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 4, 2017, at the Queen City Club, 331 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio.

September 24, 2020.

We are furnishing this proxy statement to our shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on that date and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

Our 20162019 annual report accompanies this proxy statement.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON May 4, 2017.

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020.

This proxy statement and the 20162019 annual report are first being made available on the website at www.proxyvote.com, or and mailed to shareholders who have requested paper copies, on or about March 24, 2017.August 11, 2020. Other information on our website does not constitute part of this proxy statement.




Table of Contents

Page

Table of Contents
Page

1

3

4

4

4

4

Board Composition and Refreshment

4

Board Membership Criteria

5

Board Evaluation Process

5

Director Nominee Selection Process

6

Annual Election of Directors

6

2020 Director Nominees

7

Board and Committee Governance

12

Board Oversight

12

Board Meetings

12

Committees of the Board

13

14

Other Responsibilities and Governance Process

15

16

18

19

19

19

20

21

22

22

35

36

36

38

39

41

42

42


44

47

ITEM 2 - RECOMMENDATION OF THE FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE REGARDING COMPANY'S EXECUTIVE OFFICERS' COMPENSATION

48

49

49




Meeting and Voting Highlights

The 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Time and Date:

11:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, Thursday, May 4, 2017September 24, 2020

Place:

Queen City Club
331 East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio

Virtual meeting via online webcast

Record Date:

March 6, 2017

July 27, 2020

Purpose of Meeting

This is the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Cincinnati Bell Inc. ("Cincinnati Bell", "we", "our", "us", or the "Company"). At the meeting, we will be voting upon:

Board's
Recommendation

Votes Required for
Approval

Proposal 1:

Election of directors for one-year terms expiring in 2018.2021.

FOR each nomineeof the  Company's nominees

Majority of votes cast

Proposal 2:

Recommendation, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers' compensation.1 YEARThe vote frequency receiving the highest number of votes
Proposal 3:

Approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers' compensation.

FOR

Majority of shares present and entitled to vote

Proposal 4:3:

Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan.FORMajority of shares present and entitled to vote
Proposal 5:Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors.FORMajority of shares present and entitled to vote
Proposal 6:

Ratification of our Audit and Finance Committee's appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2020.

FOR

Majority of shares present and entitled to vote

Our Board of Directors ("Board") strongly encourages you to exercise your right to vote on these matters.  Your vote is important.  We are furnishing this proxy statement to provide information in connection with the Company and the proposals being voted upon at the 20172020 Annual Meeting.


Meeting of Shareholders.

Note Regarding Share-Related Numbers in the Proxy Statement
On October 4, 2016, we effected a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of our common shares (the "Reverse Stock Split"). All share amounts, per share amounts and share prices reflected through this proxy statement have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split, unless otherwise noted.

Who May Vote

Common and preferred stock shareholders of Cincinnati Bell Inc., whose shares are recorded directly in their names in our stock register (“shareholders of record”) at the close of business on March 6, 2017July 27, 2020 (the "Record Date"), may vote their shares on the matters to be acted upon at the meeting.Annual Meeting. Shareholders who hold shares of our common stock in “street name,” that is, through an account with a bank, broker, or other holder of record, as of such date may direct the holder of record how to vote their shares at the meetingAnnual Meeting by following the instructions that the street name holders will receive from the holder of record.


How to Vote

If you meet the above qualification, you may vote in one of the following four ways:

BY INTERNET

BY PHONE

BY MAIL

ATTEND THE MEETING

:

(

*

?

Go to www.proxyvote.com,
24/7, and follow the
instructions.  You need the
12-digit control number
included in the Notice of
Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, proxy card or voting
instructions form sent to you.  
Voting will be available until
11:59 p.m., EDT, September 23, 2020.

Call toll-free 1-800-690-6903,
24/7, and follow the instructions.  
You need the 12-digit control
number included in the Notice of
Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials, proxy card or voting
instructions form sent to you.  
Voting will be available until
11:59 p.m., EDT, May 3, 2017.


Call toll-free 1-800-690-6903, 24/7, and follow the instructions. You need the 12-digit control number includedSeptember 21, 2020
for shares held
in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy carda plan or voting instructions form sent to you. Voting will be available until
11:59 p.m., EDT, May 3, 2017.

September 23, 2020 for
shares held directly.

You can vote by marking,
dating and signing your proxy
card and returning it by mail in
the postage-paid envelope
provided. Please mail these items this item
to allow delivery prior to the
meeting.


Whether you are a shareholder of
record or a street name holder, you
may vote your shares atelectronically during the annual meetingAnnual Meeting if you attend in person.attend. See “How
“How
can I attend and vote my shares
at the meeting?” on page 60.


53.

To allow sufficient time for voting, your voting instructions must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time ("EDT"), on May 3, 2017.

Admission to

Participation in the Virtual Annual Meeting

To attend the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CBB2020AM and enter the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

If you wish to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, log into the Annual Meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CBB2020AM, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.” During the Q&A session of the Annual Meeting, we will answer questions as they come in and as time permits.  The total time allowed for the Q&A session is 20 minutes.  If we do not receive any relevant questions, we will conclude the Q&A session earlier.

To ensure the Annual Meeting is conducted in a manner that is fair to all shareholders, we may exercise discretion in determining the order in which questions are answered and the amount of time devoted to any one question.  We reserve the right to edit or reject questions we deem profane or otherwise inappropriate.  The agenda for the Annual Meeting and guidelines for submitting written questions during the Annual Meeting will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CBB2020AM.

If we experience technical difficulties during the Annual Meeting (e.g., a shareholder of record, youtemporary or prolonged power outage), we will determine whether the meeting will need to bring withbe reconvened on a later day (if the technical difficulty is more prolonged).  In any situation, we will promptly notify shareholders of the decision via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CBB2020AM.  If you to theencounter technical difficulties accessing our meeting, either the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") or any proxy card that is sent to you. Otherwise, youa support line will be admitted only upon other verificationavailable on the login page of record ownership at the admission counter.

If you own shares held in street name, bring with you to the meeting either the Notice or any voting instruction form that is sent to you, or your most recent brokerage statement or a letter from your bank, broker, or other record holder indicating that you beneficially owned shares of our common stock on March 6, 2017. We can use that to verify your beneficial ownership of common stock and admit you to the meeting. If you intend to vote at the meeting, you also will need to bring to the meeting a signed proxy from your bank, broker, or other holder of record that authorizes you to vote the shares that the record holder holds for you in its name.
Additionally, all persons will need to bring a valid government-issued photo ID to gain admission to the meeting.

Annual Meeting website.

Additional Information

More detailed information about the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and voting can be found in “Questions and Answers” beginning on page 59.

52.



Governance
Board of Directors and Committees

Recent Company Developments

On December 21, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended from time to time, the “Brookfield merger agreement”) with Charlie AcquireCo Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Brookfield Parent”), and Charlie Merger Sub Inc., an Ohio corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Brookfield Parent (“Brookfield Merger Sub”), which was subsequently amended.  Pursuant to the amended Brookfield merger agreement, subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by law) waiver of specified conditions, the Company would be acquired by Brookfield Parent for $14.50 per common share in cash.  Subject to the terms and conditions of the Brookfield merger agreement, Brookfield Merger Sub would be merged with and into the Company (the “Brookfield merger”), with the Company surviving the Brookfield merger as a subsidiary of Brookfield Parent. Brookfield Parent and Brookfield Merger Sub are affiliates of Brookfield Infrastructure Group (“Brookfield Infrastructure”).

On March 5, 2020, the Company received a binding offer from affiliates of Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets (“MIRA”), which the Board determined constituted a Superior Company Proposal (as defined in the Brookfield merger agreement).  

On March 13, 2020, the Company paid Brookfield Infrastructure a $24.8 million fee, terminated the Brookfield merger agreement and entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “MIRA merger agreement”) with Red Fiber Parent LLC (“MIRA Parent”), a Delaware limited liability company, and RF Merger Sub Inc. (“MIRA Merger Sub”), an Ohio corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of MIRA Parent, providing for, subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by law) waiver of specified conditions, the acquisition of the Company by MIRA Parent at a price of $15.50 per common share in cash. Subject to the terms and conditions of the MIRA merger agreement, MIRA Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company (the “MIRA merger”), with the Company surviving the MIRA merger as a subsidiary of MIRA Parent. MIRA Parent and MIRA Merger Sub are affiliates of MIRA.

On May 7, 2020, the shareholders of the Company adopted the MIRA merger agreement at a virtual special meeting of shareholders.

Upon the consummation of the MIRA merger, each common share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the MIRA merger (other than (i) common shares owned by the Company as treasury shares, held by MIRA Parent or MIRA Merger Sub or owned by any subsidiary of the Company or MIRA Parent and (ii) common shares with respect to which appraisal rights are properly exercised and not withdrawn or otherwise lost) will be canceled and converted into the right to receive $15.50 in cash, without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes. Immediately following the consummation of the MIRA merger, the 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares will remain outstanding and the depositary shares representing interests in such 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares will remain outstanding and continue to be listed on the NYSE. A more detailed description of the MIRA merger can be found on the Form 8-K that was filed with the SEC on March 13, 2020 and the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A that was filed with the SEC on March 25, 2020.


Governance

Item 1 - Election of Directors

Corporate Governance Overview

Proposal

Shareholders are being asked to elect ten Director nominees for a one-year term.  The Board recommends voting FOR the election of each Director nominee.

Our

Role of the Board

The Board’s primary role is to oversee the Company’s long-term business propertystrategy of creating value for its shareholders.  To effectively execute its responsibilities, members of the Board actively participate in Board and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board. Members of our Board are kept informed of our business throughCommittee meetings, engage in discussions with the Chief Executive Officer, other Company officers and shareholders, and stay abreast of trends impacting our industry and businesses in general.  The Board also ensures that it is a well-functioning, diverse group of individuals who possess strong business acumen and integrity to properly represent the best interests of shareholders in overseeing the management of the Company.

The Board is committed to good corporate governance practices and continues to make progress against key benchmarks of importance to our investors.  Some of these actions include affording proxy access rights to shareholders, offering an annual advisory vote on say on pay for executive compensation, evaluating the performance of the Board, its Committees, the Chief Executive Officer and other key executive officers by reviewing materials provided to them, by visiting our offices and by participating in meetingsproperly planning for the succession of key positions.

Board Composition and Refreshment

On May 1, 2019, Mr. Phillip R. Cox retired from his role as Chairman, and Ms. Lynn A. Wentworth was selected as Chairman.  Upon Mr. Cox’s retirement, the size of the Board and its committees.

was reduced to (and remains at) ten persons.

The Company’s Amended Regulations provide thatBoard refreshment process (whose aim is to add directors with new perspectives and knowledge about the Company's industries/businesses and other industry and Board shall consistexperience) has already resulted in the addition of not less than nine nor more than 17 persons, withfour new independent directors in the exact number to be fixed and determined by resolution of the Board or by resolution of the shareholders at any annual or special meeting of shareholders. At this time, the Board has determined that the Board shall consist of nine members.

last six years.

The Company has a long-standing policy that the positions of Chairman of the Board (currently held by Mr. Phillip R. Cox)Ms. Lynn A. Wentworth) and Chief Executive Officer (currently held by Mr. Theodore H. Torbeck)Leigh R. Fox) should be held by separate persons, as discussedset forth in its Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Company continues to believe that this structure is in the best interest of its shareholders because it facilitates the Board’s oversight of management, allows the independent directors to be more actively involved in setting agendas and establishing priorities for the work of the Board, and is consistent with the principles of good corporate governance.

For information on how to obtain a copy of the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, please see page 57.

Our

Board Membership Criteria

The Board currentlyand the Governance and Nominating Committee believe there are certain characteristics that every Director should exhibit and other important qualifications and experiences that should be represented on the Board but not necessarily by every individual Director.

Consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance and Nominating Committee seeks geographic, age, gender and ethnic diversity among the members of the Board. While the Board has the following four committees: (i) the Audit and Finance Committee, (ii) the Compensation Committee, (iii)not adopted a formal policy with regard to diversity, the Governance and Nominating Committee and (iv) the ExecutiveBoard believe that considering diversity is consistent with the goal of creating a Board that best serves the needs of the Company and the interests of its shareholders, and it is one of the many factors that they consider when identifying individuals for Board membership. In addition, we believe that diversity with respect to tenure is important in order to provide for both fresh perspectives and deep experience and knowledge of the Company.

Required Characteristics

The Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee expect every Director to be a person of high integrity with an established leadership reputation in his or her field and to be able to devote the time and effort necessary to properly fulfill their Board and Committee responsibilities.  Directors must also demonstrate ethical behavior, a respect for diverse individuals and cultures, good business judgment, innovative thinking, adherence to corporate governance requirements, and a commitment to responsibly addressing environmental and social issues.

Important Qualifications and Experiences

The Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee believe that it is important for the following qualifications and experiences to be represented on the Board:

Experience as a director of a large corporate or public company board

Experience in business development, mergers and acquisitions, or other investment strategies

Knowledge of financial markets, financing and funding operations, and accounting and financial reporting processes

Expertise in the following industries:  cable, entertainment media, IT services/hardware, network, technology, telecommunications or other related industries

General business experience as an executive officer, including insights in human capital, marketing, operations, risk management and/or sales

Each of the current Directors possess at least 50% of the key qualifications and experiences, and all important qualifications and experiences are represented by at least half of the Directors.  Information on each director, including some of their specific experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills, is set forth in the biographies on pages 8-11 of this proxy.

Board Evaluation Process

The Board recognizes that evaluating the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees is a key component of a good corporate governance program.  The annual evaluation process provides an opportunity for Directors to assess the Board’s performance, offer insight into areas for improvement and provide general feedback.  Under the oversight of the Chairman and in conjunction with the Board’s outside consultant, the evaluation process involves several steps:

Each Director provides feedback through a questionnaire on the Board’s composition and structure, effectiveness of Board and Committee meetings and materials, interaction with management, and overall performance of Board and Committees

The outside consultant conducts one-on-one interviews with each Director to review his/her questionnaire responses and discuss any additional feedback or perspective

The outside consultant prepares a summary of the information provided through the questionnaires and one-on-one interviews to be previewed with the Chairman and then presented to the Board

The Board discusses the results of the evaluation process and considers changes in practices or procedures to be implemented as appropriate


Director Nominee Selection Process

Director Vacancy Nominees

Any qualified individual or group, including shareholders, incumbent directors and members of senior management, may at any time propose a candidate to serve on the Board. Background information on proposed candidates is forwarded to the Governance and Nominating Committee.  For information on how to propose a candidate to serve on the Board, please see page 57. The membersGovernance and functionNominating Committee reviews forwarded materials relating to prospective candidates in the event of a director vacancy. A candidate selected from the review is interviewed by each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee, unless the member waives the interview requirement. If approved by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the candidate will be recommended to the Board for consideration. The Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates shareholder-recommended candidates in the same manner that it evaluates all other candidates.

Annual Meeting Nominees

In 2018, the shareholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Regulations to provide for proxy access (“Proxy Access Regulation”).  The amendment allows eligible shareholders to nominate their own candidate(s), along with the Board’s nominees, for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for an annual meeting of shareholders.  For more information on how to nominate a candidate under the Proxy Access Regulation, see page 57.

The Governance and Nominating Committee did not receive and, therefore, did not consider any recommendations for director candidates by any shareholder for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

In considering each director nominee recommended by the Board for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee evaluated each nominee’s background, qualifications, attributes and skills to serve as a director. The Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee also considered the years of experience many directors have had working together on the Board and the deep knowledge of the Company they have developed as a result of such service. The Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee also evaluated each of the director’s contributions to the Board and his or her role in the operation of the Board as a whole. We believe that our director nominees bring a well-rounded variety of experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills, and represent a mix of deep knowledge of the Company and fresh perspectives.

Annual Election of Directors

Annual Election

Directors are elected each year at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to hold office until the next annual meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.  If, at the time of the Annual Meeting, one or more of the nominees should be unavailable or unable to serve as a candidate, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted to elect the remaining nominees, if any, and any substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board. The Board knows of no reason why any of the nominees will be unavailable or unable to serve.

Majority Vote Requirements; Holdover Directors

A director nominee who receives a majority of the votes cast will be elected to the Board.  If a director nominee is an incumbent director and does not receive a majority of the votes cast, the Company's Amended and Restated Regulations require that such "holdover director" promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board, subject to acceptance by the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the holdover director's resignation or whether other action should be taken.  The Board will act on the tendered resignation by the holdover director, taking into account the Governance and Nominating Committee's recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the tendered resignation of the holdover director and the rationale behind the decision within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results by the Inspector of Elections.  The Governance and Nominating Committee in making its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may consider any factors or other information that they consider appropriate and relevant.  The holdover director who tenders his or her resignation shall not participate in the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee or the decision of the Board with respect to his or her tendered resignation.

If a holdover director's resignation is accepted by the Board pursuant to the Company's Amended and Restated Regulations, the Board may either fill the resulting vacancy or, if permitted, may decrease the size of the Board in accordance with law and the Company's Amended and Restated Regulations.


2020 Director Nominees

The Company’s Amended and Restated Regulations provide that the Board shall consist of not less than nine nor more than seventeen persons, with the exact number to be fixed and determined by resolution of the Board or by resolution of the shareholders at any annual or special meeting of shareholders. In connection with Mr. Phillip R. Cox's decision to not seek re-election at the expiration of his term, the Board determined that the Board shall consist of ten persons following the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  As a result, only ten persons have been nominated for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Based upon the recommendations of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated Meredith J. Ching, Walter A. Dods, Jr., John W. Eck, Leigh R. Fox, Jakki L. Haussler, Craig F. Maier, Russel P. Mayer, Theodore H. Torbeck, Lynn A. Wentworth and Martin J. Yudkovitz to serve until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  Each of the nominees is standing for re-election.  The Board has determined that all director nominees, other than Mr. Fox, are independent and have no relationship with the Company other than as a shareholder and director.

Information regarding the business experience of each committeenominee is provided on pages 8-11.

Vote Required

A director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast to be elected to the Board.  Since neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will be considered as votes cast in the election of directors, they will not have an effect on the outcome of the election.


Our Recommendation

The Board recommends election of each of the nominees.

The following are described below. brief biographies of each person nominated for election as a director of the Company.

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS

(Terms Expire in 2021)

Ms. Ching is currently Executive Vice President of External Affairs at Alexander & Baldwin ("A&B").  Since joining A&B in 1982, Ms. Ching has held a number of positions of increasing responsibility. She is a director and member of the Compensation Committee of Matson, Inc.   Ms. Ching served as a director and member of the Audit and Compensation committees of Hawaiian Telcom's Board prior to the merger with Cincinnati Bell Inc. in July 2018.  Director since 2018. Age 64.

Ms. Ching is an active member of the community and has served on numerous non-profit boards with current board service including the Kapiolani Health Foundation, Hawaii Ag and Culinary Alliance and A&B Sugar Museum. She has also been appointed to several government boards and commissions including the State Commission on Water Resource Management, State Board of Agriculture, Honolulu Charter Commission and the Governor’s Task Force on the Department of Environmental Protection.  Her corporate and community service experience make Ms. Ching a valuable asset to the Board and in her role as a member of the Compensation Committee.

Meredith J. Ching

Mr. Dods is retired.  He served as Director of Hawaiian Telcom’s Board prior to the merger with Cincinnati Bell Inc. in July 2018, including serving as Chairman of the Board from 2008 to 2010.  He held positions as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of First Hawaiian Bank, Chairman of Alexander & Baldwin, and Chairman of Matson, Inc.  He currently serves on the boards of First Hawaiian Bank, Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., Pohaku Pa’a, LLC, and Servco Pacific Inc.  He also serves on several civic and community boards throughout the state of Hawaii.  Director since 2018.  Age 79.

With over 50 years of experience in the banking and financial services industry as well as service on numerous public company and non-profit boards, Mr. Dods brings a unique perspective to the Board.  This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee and Executive Committee.

Walter A. Dods, Jr.


Mr. Eck is currently President and CEO of Mattress Firm, the nation's largest specialty retailer of bedding products.   Mr. Eck previously served as the Chief Local Media Officer at Univision Communications, Inc. ("Univision"), the leading Hispanic media company in the United States.  Prior to joining Univision in 2011, Mr. Eck worked at NBC Universal (“NBCU”) for 18 years, most recently serving as President of the NBC Television Network.  While with NBCU, he also led MediaWorks, NBCU’s technology and operations division.  Prior to joining NBCU, Mr. Eck held various other executive and financial positions at General Electric Company ("GE"). Director since 2014.  Age 60.

With over 35 years of media, operating, finance and technology experience at Univision, NBCU, GE and now Mattress Firm, Mr. Eck brings a significant leadership background and relevant industry experience.  This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee.

John W. Eck

Mr. Fox has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cincinnati Bell Inc. since June 1, 2017.  Mr. Fox joined Cincinnati Bell in 2001 and held several positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer from September 2016 to June 2017; Chief Financial Officer from October 2013 to September 2016; Chief Administrative Officer from July 2013 to October 2013; Senior Vice President of Finance and Operations from December 2012 to July 2013; and Vice President of Finance at Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions Inc. from October 2008 to December 2012.  Director since 2018.  Age 47.

Mr. Fox is on the boards of the USA Regional Chamber, American Red Cross, Anthony Munoz Foundation, University of Cincinnati Foundation, and ArtsWave.  Mr. Fox brings to the Board valuable public-company financial experience, a keen understanding of the communications and information technology industries, and vast knowledge of the Company’s business.

Leigh R. Fox

Ms. Haussler has served as Chairman of Opus Capital Group (a registered investment advisory firm) since 1996 and she also served as Chief Executive Officer from 1996 to June 2019. She is a director of Morgan Stanley Funds. She is a former director of Capvest Venture Fund, LP, Adena Ventures, LP (a venture capital fund), Blue Chip Venture Company (a venture capital fund) and The Victory Funds. Director since 2008. Age 63.

With more than 30 years of experience in the financial services industry, including her years of entrepreneurial and managerial experience in the development and growth of Opus Capital Group, Ms. Haussler brings a valuable perspective to the Company’s Board. Through her role at Opus Capital and her service as a director of several venture capital funds and other boards, Ms. Haussler has gained valuable experience dealing with accounting principles and evaluating financial results of large corporations. She is a certified public accountant (inactive), an attorney in the State of Ohio (inactive), and an audit committee financial expert under SEC regulations. This experience, coupled with her educational background, makes her a valuable asset to the Board as Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and as a member of the Executive Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee.

Jakki L. Haussler


Mr. Maier is retired.  He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Frisch’s Restaurants, Inc. ("Frisch's"), an operator of family style restaurants and a former publicly-traded company, a position he held from 1989 to 2015. He was also a director of Frisch’s from 1984 to 2015. Director since 2008. Age 70.

With over 20 years of experience as the chief executive officer of a large, publicly-traded company, Mr. Maier brings to the Board demonstrated management and leadership ability. In addition, Mr. Maier has valuable experience dealing with accounting principles, financial reporting regulations and evaluating financial results of large companies. This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and Executive Committee.

Craig F. Maier

Mr. Mayer is retired and is now working part time with a large consulting company in information technology and digital, and business transformation.  He also was the chair of the Emerging Manufacturing IT and Digital Technologies Advisory Board for the CEO of a large software and services company for 5 years after retirement.  Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Mayer held several executive-level information technology and business process re-engineering positions at General Electric Company ("GE").  Most recently, he was Executive Vice President, CIO, and Quality Leader at GE Healthcare from 2009 to 2012.  Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and CIO at GE Healthcare from 2005 to 2008; Vice President and CIO at GE Aircraft Engines and later to include GE Transportation from 2000 to 2005; and CIO and Chief Quality Officer at NBC from 1998 to 2000.  He held various other information technology and business process improvement positions at GE from 1986 to 1998.  Prior to that, he held multiple leadership positions at Chiquita Brands International, Republic Steel Corporation and Enduro Stainless Corporation.  Director since 2013.  Age 66.

With over 40 years of information technology and business process transformation experience at large, global organizations, Mr. Mayer brings relevant industry experience from the customer’s perspective.  This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee.  He also serves as a valuable resource to the Company’s management team.

Russel P. Mayer

Mr. Torbeck retired as Chief Executive Officer of Cincinnati Bell Inc. effective May 31, 2017.  Prior to his retirement, he also served as President from January 31, 2013 until September 1, 2016.  He joined Cincinnati Bell in 2010 as President and General Manager of Cincinnati Bell Communications Group.  Prior to joining Cincinnati Bell, Mr. Torbeck was Chief Executive Officer of the Freedom Group, Inc. and also worked for 28 years for the General Electric Company (“GE”), where he served as the Vice President of Operations for GE Industrial Business, President and CEO of GE’s Rail Services business and Vice President of Global Supply Chain for GE Aviation.  He is a director of Americraft Manufacturing, Inc.  He serves on the boards of CTI Clinical Trial & Consulting and Triumph Signs & Consulting, Inc., as well as several non-profit boards.  Director since January 2013.  Age 64.

Mr. Torbeck brings to the Board critical knowledge and understanding of the products and services offered by the Company and a strong understanding of the telecommunications industry.  Mr. Torbeck’s prior business and management experience also provides the Board with a valuable perspective on managing a successful business.  He also serves as a member of the Executive Committee.

Theodore H. Torbeck


Ms. Wentworth is the former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. ("BlueLinx"), a building products distributor, from 2007 to 2008. Prior to joining BlueLinx, she was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for BellSouth Corporation’s Communications Group ("BellSouth") and held various other positions at BellSouth from 1985 to 2007. She is a certified public accountant licensed in the State of Georgia. She is a director, chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Nominating & Governance Committee of Graphic Packaging Holding Company.  She is also a director, chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee of CyrusOne Inc. Director since 2008. Age 61.

Ms. Wentworth’s experience as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of BlueLinx as well as her 22 years of telecommunications industry experience at BellSouth makes her a valuable asset as Chairman of the Board and as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Executive Committee. Ms. Wentworth qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under applicable SEC regulations. Ms. Wentworth’s prior experience has provided her with a wealth of knowledge in dealing with complex financial and accounting matters affecting large corporations in the telecommunications industry.

Lynn A. Wentworth

Mr. Yudkovitz is retired.  He was head of The Walt Disney Company’s ("Disney") Strategic Innovation Group (2010 through 2015).  He also served as the Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Business Development at Disney (2005-2010) and as President of TiVo Inc. (2003-2005).  Previously, Mr. Yudkovitz was President of two divisions at NBC and a key member of the teams that developed and launched the CNBC and MSNBC networks. Mr. Yudkovitz currently serves as Chairman of the FCC Advisory SubCommittee on Rural Deployment of Broadband.  Director since 2015.  Age 66.

With over 30 years of experience in both traditional and digital media, Mr. Yudkovitz brings to the Board relevant industry experience, which makes him a valuable asset to the Board as a member of the Compensation Committee.  In addition, Mr. Yudkovitz's previous experience leading large strategic business innovation initiatives at both NBC and Disney makes him a valuable advisor to the Company’s management team on key areas of growth.

Martin J. Yudkovitz


Board and Committee Governance

Board Oversight

Strategy

The Board has a responsibility to the shareholders to ensure the Company’s business strategy is well planned and executed.  While overseeing and monitoring the strategy is a continuous activity, the Board dedicates one meeting each year to the strategic planning process.  Throughout the year, the Board and Management engage in discussions on various short- and long-term elements of the strategy, including financial measures and operational performance.

Risk

Risk oversight is an important responsibility of the Board and it relies on the Audit and Finance Committee and the Company’s Chief Security Officer to provide regular updates on the Company’s cyber and enterprise risk management program.  The Company also engages external firms to periodically audit the program for effectiveness and provide evaluation reports directly to the Board.

Although the Company takes proactive and reasonable steps to address security risks, including the use of insurance, we understand that cyber security, and security in general, is a fluid issue and that serious security incidents are possible and could have a material effect on our business.  To learn more about risks facing the Company, please see Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, and as amended and supplemented in Item 1A. Risk Factors on Form 10-K/A for updated risks in light of COVID-19.  To date, we have not experienced any material security incident and continue to evaluate security risks to our businesses along with the adoption of new control measures to address current and anticipated threats.

Leadership Planning

Another key responsibility of the Board is to ensure the development and retention of senior talent needed to execute the strategy and manage the day-to-day operations of the business.  The Board and the Compensation Committee meet annually and as needed to evaluate the performance of key individuals, discuss potential successors and identify development plans to ensure readiness for future succession opportunities and contingencies.

Environmental and Social Responsibility

The Board recognizes that sustainability is important to our business, our shareholders and our planet.  Investors are increasingly looking to engage with companies that are committed to protecting the environment and making an overall positive impact in the communities in which we serve.  The Governance and Nominating Committee monitors the Company’s environmental and social actions and regularly updates the Board on the progress toward goals.

Board Meetings

During fiscal year 2016,2019, the Board held sixtwenty meetings and twice took action by unanimous written consent three times, and all directors attended at least 75% of all Board and applicable committee meetings during the period in which he or she served as a director, except Mr. John M. Zrno, whose attendance of 67% was due to the terminal illness of his spouse for whom he was the primary caregiver. With the exception of 2016, Mr. Zrno's prior attendance has been at or above the 75% threshold throughout his tenure on the Board and the Company is confident that Mr. Zrno's attendance will not be an issue in 2017.

director.

Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the Annual Meetingannual meeting of Shareholders.shareholders.  With the exception of Mr. Zrno as noted above,Yudkovitz, all of the directors, who were on the Board at the time and were seeking election, attended the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

For information on how to obtain a copy of the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, please see page 64.


4



Director Independence
In accordance with the rules and listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board affirmatively evaluates and determines the independence of each director and each nominee for election. Based on an analysis of information supplied by the directors, the Board evaluates whether any director has any material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company that might cause a conflict of interest in the performance of a director’s duties.
Based on these standards, the Board determined that each of the following persons who served as a non-employee director in 2016 is independent and has no relationship with the Company, except as a director and shareholder:
• Phillip R. Cox• Russel P. Mayer
• John W. Eck• Lynn A. Wentworth
• Jakki L. Haussler• Martin J. Yudkovitz
• Craig F. Maier• John M. Zrno
In addition, based on these standards, the Board determined that Mr. Torbeck was not independent because he served as the President (until September 1, 2016) and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in 2016.
The non-employee directors of the Company meet in executive session without management present at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. Mr. Cox presides at the meetings of the non-employee directors.

Committees of the Board

The Board has created four committees:committees to more efficiently manage its responsibilities:  (i) the Audit and Finance Committee, (ii) the Compensation Committee, (iii) the Governance and NominatingExecutive Committee and (iv) the ExecutiveGovernance and Nominating Committee.  For information on how to obtain a copy of each committee’s charter (other than the Executive Committee), please see page 64.

57.

The directors serving on each Committee are appointed by the Board at least annually for one-year terms expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders.

The following table lists the chairs (C) and members (M) of each standing committee at the end of 2016:

2019:

Name of Director (a)

Audit and

Finance

Compensation

Executive

Governance and

Nominating

Executive

Non-Employee Directors (a)

Meredith J. Ching

M

Phillip R. Cox

Walter A. Dods, Jr.

M

M

M

M

M

C

John W. Eck

M

M

M

M

Leigh R. Fox

M

Jakki L. Haussler

M

C

M

M

M

Craig F. Maier

M

M

C

C

M

M

Russel P. Mayer

M

M

C

M

Theodore H. Torbeck

M

Lynn A. Wentworth

C

M

M

M

C

M

Martin J. Yudkovitz

M

M

M

John M. Zrno

MM
Employee Directors
Theodore H. TorbeckM

(a)

(a)All non-employee

With the exception of Messrs. Fox and Torbeck, all directors were determined by the Board to be independent directors.


5



The function of each committee is described below.

Audit and Finance Committee:Committee

The Audit and Finance Committee currently consists of sixfive persons, none of whom is an executive officer of the Company.  The Audit and Finance Committee held five meetings during 2016.2019.  The purpose of the Audit and Finance Committee is, among other things, to assist the Board in its oversight of (i) the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the independence and qualifications of the independent registered public accounting firm ("Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm"), (iv) the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, and (v) the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. To this end, the Audit and Finance Committee meets in executive session with its own members and may also meet separately with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the Company’s internal auditors, General Counsel or members of management. The Audit and Finance Committee Charter provides a more detailed description of the responsibilities and duties of the Audit and Finance Committee. For information on how to obtain a copy of the Audit and Finance Committee Charter, please see page 64.

While the Board has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight, it delegates many of these functions to the Audit and Finance Committee. The Audit and Finance Committee receives regular updates on the Company’s existing and emerging risks from the Company’s Internal Audit department. The updates are based upon interviews with senior management of the Company as well as other key employees. The updates include risk rankings and a general description of risk mitigation activities pertaining to each item.  In addition, the Audit and Finance Committee receives regular updates from the Company’s Chief Security Officer on cyber security risks and the actions being taken by his department to monitor and mitigate those risks.  The Audit and Finance Committee also oversees the Company’s Security Breach Response and Notification Plan, which sets forth the Company’s plan for notifying affected persons and other stakeholders in the event a security breach involving personally identifiable information or protected health information triggers notification requirements under applicable law.  The Audit and Finance Committee provides periodic updates to the full Board on risk oversight and cyber security matters.

In performing its duties, the Audit and Finance Committee meets as often as necessary and at least once each calendar quarter with members of management, the Company’s internal audit staff and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. An agenda for each such meeting is provided in advance to the members of the Audit and Finance Committee.



The Board determined that each member of the Audit and Finance Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the independence and other requirements of the rules and listing standards of the NYSE.New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).  No member of the Audit and Finance Committee serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies. In addition, the Board determined that Mr. Eck, Ms. WentworthHaussler and Ms. HausslerWentworth are audit committee financial experts as defined in the regulations of the SEC and that each member of the Audit and Finance Committee is financially literate as defined by the rules and listing standards of the NYSE.  For Mr. Eck’s, Ms. Wentworth’sHaussler's and Ms. Haussler’sWentworth's relevant experience, please see pages 14 - 15.

9 and 11, respectively.

Compensation Committee:Committee

The Compensation Committee currently consists of five persons, none of whom is an executive officer. The Compensation Committee held sixfive meetings during 2016.2019. The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things, ensuring that directors and certain key executives are effectively and competitively compensated in terms of base compensation and short- and long-term incentive compensation and benefits. In addition, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and reviews with management the succession planning process for key executive positions. The Compensation Committee Charter provides a more detailed description of the responsibilities and duties of the Compensation Committee. For information on how to obtain a copy of the Compensation Committee Charter, please see page 64.

The Compensation Committee meets as often as necessary to perform its duties.  The Compensation Committee also meets separately with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other corporate officers, as it deems appropriate, to establish and review the performance criteria and compensation of the Company’s executive officers. An agenda for each such meeting is provided in advance to the members of the Compensation Committee.

The Board determined that each member of the Compensation Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the rules and listing standards of the NYSE.


6



Executive Committee

The Executive Committee currently consists of six persons, including Mr. Fox, who currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Torbeck, who served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company until May 31, 2017. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2019. The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board in certain matters, when necessary, between Board meetings.

Governance and Nominating Committee:  In 2016, theCommittee

The Governance and Nominating Committee consistedcurrently consists of sixfive persons, none of whom is an executive officer. The Governance and Nominating Committee held threefour meetings and took action by unanimous written consent once during 2016.2019. The Governance and Nominating Committee, among other things, identifies individuals to become members of the Board, periodically reviews the size and composition of the Board, evaluates the performance of Board members, makes recommendations regarding the determination of a director’s independence, recommends committee appointments and chairpersons to the Board, periodically reviews and recommends to the Board updates to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and related Company policies, and oversees an annual evaluation of the Board and its committees.committees and monitors the Company's environmental and social responsibility actions. The Governance and Nominating Committee Charter provides a more detailed description of the responsibilities and duties of the Governance and Nominating Committee. For information on how to obtain a copy of

The General Counsel and the Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, please see page 64.

The Chief Executive Officer and theCorporate Secretary of the Company typically attend the meetings of the Governance and Nominating Committee. An agenda for each such meeting is provided in advance to the members of the Governance and Nominating Committee.

The Board determined that each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the rules and listing standards of the NYSE.

Executive Committee:  The Executive Committee currently consists of five persons, one of whom is Mr. Torbeck who serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Executive Committee held two meetings during 2016. The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board in certain matters, when necessary, between Board meetings.

Director Independence

In accordance with the rules and listing standards of the NYSE and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board affirmatively evaluates and determines the independence of each director and each nominee for election. Based on an analysis of information supplied by the directors, the Board evaluates whether any director has any material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company, which might cause a conflict of interest in the performance of a director’s duties.



Based on these standards, the Board determined that each of the following persons who served as a non-employee director in 2019 is independent and has no relationship with the Company, except as a director and shareholder:

•  Phillip R. Cox (a)

•  Craig F. Maier

•  Meredith J. Ching

•  Russel P. Mayer

•  Walter A. Dods, Jr.

•  Theodore H. Torbeck (b)

•  John W. Eck

•  Martin J. Yudkovitz

•  Jakki L. Haussler

•  Lynn A. Wentworth

(a)

Mr. Cox retired from the Board on May 1, 2019.

(b)

Mr. Torbeck retired as Chief Executive Officer of the Company on May 31, 2017.  

(c)

In addition, based on these standards, the Board determined that Mr. Fox was not independent because he currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

The independent, non-employee directors of the Company meet in executive session without management present at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The Chairman of the Board presides at the meetings of the non-employee directors.

Other Responsibilities and Governance Process

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the members of the Compensation Committee included Ms. Wentworth, Ms. Ching and Messrs. Cox, Eck,Dods, Maier and Yudkovitz. None of the Compensation Committee members have at any time been an officer or employee of the Company. None of the Company’s executive officers serve, or in the past fiscal year served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on the Company’s Board or Compensation Committee.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND CODES OF ETHICS

Code of Business Conduct and Codes of Ethics

The Company has a Code of Business Conduct applicable to all officers and employees that describes requirements related to ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with laws. In addition to the Code of Business Conduct, the Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers are subject to the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and the directors are subject to the Code of Ethics for Directors.

For information on how to obtain a copy of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers or Code of Ethics for Directors, please see page 64.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
pages 57 - 58.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

The Board is committed to upholding the highest legal and ethical conduct in fulfilling its responsibilities and recognizes that related party transactions can present a heightened risk of potential or actual conflicts of interest. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is the Company’s preference to avoid related party transactions. Current SEC rules define a related party transaction to include any transaction, arrangement or relationship (i) in which the Company is a participant, (ii) in which the transaction has an aggregate value greater than $120,000, and (iii) in which any of the following persons has or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

an executive officer, director or director nominee of the Company;

any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company's common and preferred shares;

any person who is an immediate family member (as defined under Item 404 of Regulation S-K) of an executive officer, director or director nominee or beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company's common or preferred shares; or

any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person, together with any other of the foregoing persons, has a 10% or greater beneficial ownership interest.



7



The Company's Code of Business Conduct, the Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and the Company’s Code of Ethics for Directors require directors, officers and all other members of the workforce to avoid any relationship, influence or activity that would cause or even appear to cause a conflict of interest. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and Code of Ethics for Directors generally require (i) a director to promptly disclose to the Governance and Nominating Committee any potential or actual conflict of interest involving him or her and (ii) an employee, including the executive officers, to promptly disclose a conflict of interest to the General Counsel. The Governance and Nominating Committee (and, if applicable, the General Counsel) determines an appropriate resolution to actual or potential conflicts of interest on a case-by-case basis. All directors must recuse themselves from any discussion or decision affecting their personal, business or professional interests.

All related party transactions shall be disclosed in the Company's applicable filings with the SEC as required under the SEC rules.  In 2016,2019, there were no related party transactions requiring disclosure.



8



Director Compensation

Annual Compensation Program

The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. In setting director compensation, the Company considers the significant amount of time that Directors spend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the skill level required.

Compensation for Employee Directors

Directors who are also employees of the Company (or any subsidiary of the Company) receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board or its committees during the period of their employment. If such directors continue on the Board after their employment ends, such directors may receive additional compensation in connection with such continued service.

General Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors

Directors who are not employees of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company (“non-employee directors”) while serving as directors of the Company receive compensation from the Company for their service on the Board. The table below sets forth the annual compensation for non-employee directors in 2016.2019.

Compensation Element

 

2019

 

Chairman of the Board Annual Retainer (a)

 

$

180,000

 

Annual Board Retainer

 

$

70,000

 

Annual Chairman Equity Award (b)

 

$

145,000

 

Annual Board Equity Award (b)

 

$

110,000

 

Annual Audit and Finance Committee Chair Retainer

 

$

27,000

 

Annual Audit and Finance Committee Member Retainer

 

$

15,000

 

Annual Compensation Committee Chair Retainer

 

$

18,000

 

Annual Compensation Committee Member Retainer

 

$

10,000

 

Annual Governance and Nominating Committee Chair Retainer

 

$

16,000

 

Annual Governance and Nominating Committee Member Retainer

 

$

10,000

 

Compensation Element2016
Chairman of the Board Annual Retainer (a)$320,000
Annual Board Retainer$70,000
Annual Board Equity Award (b)$90,000
Annual Audit and Finance Committee Chairman Retainer$27,000
Annual Audit and Finance Committee Member Retainer$15,000
Annual Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer$18,000
Annual Compensation Committee Member Retainer$10,000
Annual Governance and Nominating Committee Chairman Retainer$16,000
Annual Governance and Nominating Committee Member Retainer$10,000

(a)

(a)

The Chairman is not entitled to receive any of the other annual Board or Committee retainers described above; however, the Chairman is eligible for the Annual Board Equity Award.  The annual retainer for the Chairman of the Board was reduced from $320,000 to $180,000, effective May 2, 2019.

(b)

(b)

The Annual Board Equity Award is paid in the form of an awardfor 2019 was granted under the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 20072017 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. In 2016, the Annual Board Equity Award was paidDirectors to all non-employee directors, including the Chairman of the Board, in the form of restricted stock units with an aggregate value of $90,000 and a one-year vesting period. On August 2, 2016,The award value for 2019 is $145,000 for the Board increased the value of the Annual Board Equity Award to $100,000 beginning with the 2017 award grants.Chairman and $110,000 for all other non-employee directors.



Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan

Effective October 30, 2015,

On May 4, 2017, the Boardshareholders approved the termination of the elective deferral part of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. Deferred Compensation2017 Stock Plan for OutsideNon-Employee Directors (the “Directors Deferred Compensation“2017 Directors Plan”).  In accordance with Section 409A ofUnder this plan, the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder, no new deferrals have been or will be permitted under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan and all outstanding elective account balances were liquidated and distributed to the participants on November 7, 2016.

Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
The Company grants its non-employee directors time-based restricted shares, restricted stock units, and/or options to purchase common shares under the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (the “2007 Directors Plan”).shares. Pursuant to the current terms of such plan, each non-employee director of the Company, at the discretion of the Board, may be granted a number of restricted common shares, restricted stock units, and/or a stock option for a number of common shares (as determined by the Board) on the date of each annual meeting, if such director first became a non-employee director of the Company before the date of such annual meeting and continues in office as a non-employee director after such annual meeting.

9




Currently under the 20072017 Directors Plan, up to 300,000350,000 common shares may in the aggregate be the subject of awards granted during the life of the plan, all of which could be subject to stock option awards, restricted stock awards or restricted stock units.  The Company has flexibility regarding the type of awards to issue.  The Board will exercise its discretion in granting such options, time-based restricted shares, or restricted stock units with the intent that such grants, together with other Company equity-based compensation, provide Company equity-based compensation that is competitive with the value of equity-based compensation provided by comparable companies to their non-employee directors.

Under the 2007 Directors Plan, in 2016 the Company granted restricted stock unit awards that vest after one year and with an aggregate value of $90,000 on the date of grant to each non-employee director. In 2017, the Company intends to again grant restricted stock units that vest after one year and with an aggregate value of $100,000 on the date of grant to each incumbent non-employee director. Awards granted in 2015 had an aggregate value of $80,000. Awards granted in 2014 had an aggregate value of $70,000. For 2014 and 2015, the awards were also in the form of restricted stock units which vested on the first anniversary of the grant date.

Each stock option granted to a non-employee director under the 20072017 Directors Plan, or a predecessor plan, requires that upon the exercise of the option, the price to be paid for the common shares that are being purchased under the option will be equal to 100% of the fair market value of such shares as determined at the time thesuch option is granted. With certain exceptions provided in the 20072017 Directors Plan, a non-employee director of the Company who is granted an option under the plan generally will have ten years from the date of the grant to exercise the option.

In general, each award will require that the restrictions not lapse in full unless the non-employee director (i) continues to serve as a director of the Company for the vesting period after the applicable award grant date, or (ii) ends service as a Company director under special circumstances (e.g., death, disability, or attaining retirement age).

On May 2, 2019, the Company granted restricted stock unit awards that vest after one year and with an aggregate value of $145,000 for the Chairman and $110,000 for each of the remaining non-employee directors on the date of grant under the 2017 Directors Plan.  Awards in 2018 were granted under the 2017 Directors Plan with an aggregate value of $100,000.  Awards in 2017 were granted under the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the "2007 Directors Plan"), which was replaced by the 2017 Directors Plan.  Awards granted in 2017 had an aggregate value of $100,000.  For 2017 and 2018, the awards were in the form of restricted stock units which vested on the first anniversary of the grant date.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

The Board recognizes that stock ownership is an important means of aligning the interests of the Board with those of its shareholders.  

Aside from the Company's actual performance from one year to the next, the price of the Company's stock may vary due to the general condition of the economy and the stock market.  Therefore, the Board may measure a director’s progress more on the basis of the year-over-year increase in the number of shares owned rather than the overall market value of the shares owned in relation to the director’s ownership goal.  For purposes of measuring ownership, only shares owned outright or beneficially held by the director (including shares owned by the director’s spouse or dependent children) are included.  Shares represented by outstanding phantom shares, unvested stock options or any other form of equity for which a performance or vesting condition remains to be completed before the director earns a right to and receives the shares are not counted in determining the director’s level of ownership.

The Board has determined that each non-employee director should hold three times their annual retainer in company stock.  New directors will have three years from the date they join the board to meet the ownership guidelines.



As of July 27, 2020, each of the directors have achieved the following percentage of their respective ownership goal:


Ms. Ching 205%




10

Mr. Dods 189%




Mr. Eck 240%

Ms. Haussler 381%

Mr. Maier 381%

Mr. Mayer 271%

Mr. Torbeck 1925%

Ms. Wentworth 157%

Mr. Yudkovitz 285%

2016

2019 Director Compensation

The following table shows the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for the 20162019 fiscal year:

 

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash ($)

 

 

Stock

Awards ($)

(a) (b)

 

 

Option

Awards ($)

(b)

 

 

Total ($)

 

Phillip R. Cox (c)

 

 

135,083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

135,083

 

Meredith J. Ching

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,000

 

Walter A. Dods, Jr.

 

 

86,667

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

196,667

 

John W. Eck (d)

 

 

68,333

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

178,333

 

Jakki L. Haussler

 

 

103,500

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

213,500

 

Craig F. Maier

 

 

103,000

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

213,000

 

Russel P. Mayer

 

 

94,500

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

204,500

 

Theodore H. Torbeck

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

180,000

 

Lynn A. Wentworth

 

 

167,417

 

 

 

145,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

312,417

 

Martin J. Yudkovitz

 

 

83,333

 

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

193,333

 

  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
 
Stock
Awards ($)
(a) (b)
 
Option
Awards ($)
(b)
 Total ($)
Phillip R. Cox 320,000
 90,000
 
 410,000
John W. Eck 90,000
 90,000
 
 180,000
Jakki L. Haussler 95,000
 90,000
 
 185,000
Craig F. Maier 103,000
 90,000
 
 193,000
Russel P. Mayer 101,000
 90,000
 
 191,000
Lynn A. Wentworth 107,000
 90,000
 
 197,000
Martin J. Yudkovitz 84,203
 90,000
 
 174,203
John M. Zrno 95,000
 90,000
 
 185,000

(a)

(a)

The values reflect the aggregate grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units granted on April 29, 2016May 2, 2019 computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”) for all awards.  For a discussion of the valuation assumptions and methodology, see Note 1215 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

(b)

(b)

No stock options were awarded in 2016. As2019.  None of the non-employee directors held outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2016, the non-employee directors and former directors held an aggregate of 37,696 unvested stock awards and an aggregate of 16,880 option awards (granted in years prior to 2008), as set forth in the following table.2019.


Name 
Number of Unvested
Stock Awards
Outstanding
as of
December 31,
2016
 
Number of Option
Awards
Outstanding
as of
December 31,
2016
Phillip R. Cox 4,712
 1,800
John W. Eck 4,712
 
Jakki L. Haussler 4,712
 
Craig F. Maier 4,712
 
Russel P. Mayer 4,712
 
Lynn A. Wentworth 4,712
 
Martin J. Yudkovitz 4,712
 
John M. Zrno 4,712
 11,480




11



Board of Directors Selection Process

(c)

Director Qualifications and Nominations

Mr. Cox only received a pro rata portion of the Chairman of the Board Annual Retainer due to his retirement from the Board on May 1, 2019.

The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. The Governance and Nominating Committee did not receive, and therefore did not consider, any recommendations for director candidates by any shareholder for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

(d)

Mr. Eck earned fees of $92,083 in 2019.  The remaining balance of the fees earned, $23,750, was paid subsequent to December 31, 2019.

The Governance and Nominating Committee uses the following process to identify and evaluate director nominee candidates. Any qualified individual or group, including shareholders, incumbent directors and members of senior management, may at any time propose a candidate to serve on the Board. Background information on proposed candidates is forwarded to the Governance and Nominating Committee. For information on how to propose a candidate to serve on the Board, please see page 64. The Governance and Nominating Committee reviews forwarded materials relating to prospective candidates in the event of a director vacancy. A candidate selected from the review is interviewed by each member of the Governance and Nominating Committee, unless the member waives the interview requirement. If approved by the Governance and Nominating Committee, the candidate will be recommended to the full Board for consideration. The Governance and Nominating Committee evaluates shareholder-recommended candidates in the same manner that it evaluates all other candidates.
All nominees to the Board should possess the following attributes:
    Established leadership reputation in his/her field;
    Known for good business judgment;
    Active in business;
    Knowledge of business on a national/global basis;
    Meets high ethical standards; and
    Commitment to regular board/committee meeting attendance.
In addition, the Board will consider the following factors:
    The nominee's familiarity with the field of IT services, entertainment and communications; and
    Whether the nominee would contribute to the gender, racial and/or geographical diversity of the Board.
While the Company has not adopted a formal process or policy for determining diversity exists on the Board, the selection criteria used by the Governance and Nominating Committee when considering director nominees, as noted above, includes as a factor whether a nominee would contribute to the gender, racial and/or geographical diversity of the Board.

12



Name

Number of Unvested

Stock Awards

Outstanding

as of

December 31,

2019

Number of Option

Awards

Outstanding

as of

December 31,

2019

Meredith J. Ching

12,485

Item 1 - Election of Directors

Walter A. Dods, Jr.

The Company’s Amended Regulations provide that the Board shall consist of not less than nine nor more than 17 persons, with the exact number to be fixed and determined by resolution of the Board or by resolution of the shareholders at any annual or special meeting of shareholders. The Board has determined that the Board shall consist of nine members.
The directors will serve until their respective successors are elected and qualified.
Based upon the recommendations of the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated Phillip R. Cox, John W. Eck, Jakki L. Haussler, Craig F. Maier, Russel P. Mayer, Lynn A. Wentworth, Martin J. Yudkovitz, John M. Zrno and Theodore H. Torbeck to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each of the nominees is standing for re-election. The Board has determined all director nominees, other than Mr. Torbeck, are independent and have no relationship with the Company other than as a shareholder and director.
If, at the time of the Annual Meeting, one or more of the nominees should be unavailable or unable to serve as a candidate, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted to elect the remaining nominees, if any, and any substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board. The Board knows of no reason why any of the nominees will be unavailable or unable to serve.
Information regarding the business experience of each nominee is provided on pages 14 - 16.
Majority Vote Requirements; Holdover Directors
A director nominee who receives a majority of the votes cast will be elected to the Board. If a director nominee is an incumbent director and does not receive a majority of the votes cast, the Company’s Amended Regulations require that such “holdover director” promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board, subject to acceptance by the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the holdover director’s resignation or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the tendered resignation by the holdover director, taking into account the Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the tendered resignation of the holdover director and the rationale behind the decision within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results by the Inspector of Elections. The Governance and Nominating Committee in making its recommendation and the Board in making its decision may consider any factors or other information that they consider appropriate and relevant. The holdover director who tenders his or her resignation shall not participate in the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee or the decision of the Board with respect to his or her tendered resignation.
If a holdover director’s resignation is accepted by the Board pursuant to the Company’s Amended Regulations, the Board may either fill the resulting vacancy or, if permitted, may decrease the size of the Board in accordance with law and the Company’s Amended Regulations.
Vote Required
A director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast to be elected to the Board. Since neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will be considered as votes cast in the election of directors, they will not have an effect on the outcome of the election.

13



Our Recommendation
The Board recommends election of each of the nominees.
The following are brief biographies of each person nominated for election as a director of the Company.

12,485

John W. Eck

12,485

Jakki L. Haussler

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS

12,485

Craig F. Maier

(Terms Expire in 2018)

12,485

Russel P. Mayer

12,485

Theodore H. Torbeck

12,485

Lynn A. Wentworth

16,458

Martin J. Yudkovitz

12,485


coxa03.jpg 
Mr. Cox has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Cox Financial Corporation (a financial planning services company) since 1972. He is a current director of TimkenSteel, Diebold Inc., and Touchstone Mutual Funds. He is a former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and Duke Energy Corporation. Director since 1993. Age 69.
With his years of entrepreneurial and managerial experience in the development and growth of Cox Financial Corporation, coupled with the experience he has gained from serving on the audit and compensation committees of several public company boards, Mr. Cox brings a valuable perspective to the Company’s Board. In addition, having served as Chairman of the Company’s Board since 2003, Mr. Cox has demonstrated an effective management style and the ability to facilitate the Board’s primary oversight functions.
Phillip R. Cox
johnwecka01.jpg
Mr. Eck is currently the Chief Local Media Officer at Univision Communications, Inc. ("Univision"), the leading Hispanic media company in the United States. Prior to joining Univision in 2011, Mr. Eck worked at NBC Universal (“NBCU”) for 18 years, most recently serving as President, Media Works, where he oversaw NBCU’s information, broadcasting and production technology and NBCU’s television and film studio operations. Prior to joining NBCU, Mr. Eck held various other executive and financial positions at General Electric Company ("GE"). Director since 2014. Age 57.
With over 33 years of media, finance and information technology experience at Univision, NBCU and GE, Mr. Eck brings relevant industry experience from the perspective of a producer and distributor of media content. This experience makes him a very valuable asset to the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee.
John W. Eck
hausslera03.jpg
Ms. Haussler has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Opus Capital Group (a registered investment advisory firm) since 1996. She is a director of Morgan Stanley Funds. She is a former director of Capvest Venture Fund, LP, Adena Ventures, LP (a venture capital fund), and The Victory Funds. Director since 2008. Age 59.

With more than 30 years of experience in the financial services industry, including her years of entrepreneurial and managerial experience in the development and growth of Opus Capital Group, Ms. Haussler brings a valuable perspective to the Company’s Board. Through her role at Opus Capital and her service as a director of several venture capital funds and other boards, Ms. Haussler has gained valuable experience dealing with accounting principles and evaluating financial results of large corporations. She is a certified public accountant (inactive), an attorney in the State of Ohio (inactive), and an audit committee financial expert under SEC regulations. This experience, coupled with her educational background, makes her a valuable asset to the Board, the Audit and Finance Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee.
Jakki L. Haussler



14



maiera03.jpg
Mr. Maier recently retired from his role as President and Chief Executive Officer of Frisch’s Restaurants, Inc. ("Frisch's"), operator of family style restaurants and former publicly-traded company, a position he held from 1989 to 2015. He was also a director of Frisch’s from 2008 to 2015. Director since 2008. Age 67.

With over 20 years of experience as the chief executive officer of a large, publicly-traded corporation, Mr. Maier brings to the Board demonstrated management and leadership ability. In addition, Mr. Maier has valuable experience dealing with accounting principles, financial reporting regulations and evaluating financial results of large corporations. This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and Executive Committee.
Craig F. Maier
mayera03.jpg
Mr. Mayer is retired, and is now working part time with several consulting companies in information technology and business process improvement. Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Mayer held several executive-level information technology and business process improvement positions at General Electric Company ("GE"). Most recently, he was Executive Vice President, CIO, and Quality Leader at GE Healthcare from 2009 to 2012. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and CIO at GE Healthcare from 2005 to 2008; Vice President and CIO at GE Aircraft Engines and GE Transportation from 2000 to 2005; and CIO and Chief Quality Officer at NBC from 1998 to 2000. He held various other information technology and business process improvement positions at GE from 1986 to 1998. Prior to that he held multiple positions at Chiquita Brands, Republic Steel and Enduro Stainless. Director since 2013. Age 63.
With over 35 years of information technology and business process improvement experience at large, global organizations, Mr. Mayer brings relevant industry experience from the customer’s perspective. This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee and a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and Executive Committee. He also serves as a valuable resource to the Company’s management team.
Russel P. Mayer
wentwortha03.jpg
Ms. Wentworth is the former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. ("BlueLinx"), a building products distributor, from 2007 to 2008. Prior to joining BlueLinx, she was, most recently, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for BellSouth Corporation’s Communications Group ("BellSouth") and held various other positions at BellSouth from 1985 to 2007. She is a certified public accountant licensed in the state of Georgia. She is a director, chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Nominating & Governance Committee of Graphic Packaging Holding Company and a director and member of the Audit & Finance and Compensation Committees of CyrusOne Inc. Director since 2008. Age 58.
Ms. Wentworth’s experience as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of BlueLinx as well as her 22 years of telecommunications industry experience at BellSouth makes her a valuable asset to the Board as Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee and Executive Committee. Ms. Wentworth qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under applicable SEC regulations. Ms. Wentworth’s prior experience has provided her with a wealth of knowledge in dealing with complex financial and accounting matters affecting large corporations in the telecommunications industry.
Lynn A. Wentworth

15



martinjyudkovitza01.jpg
Mr. Yudkovitz is retired. He was head of The Walt Disney Company’s ("Disney") Strategic Innovation Group (2010 through 2015). He also served as the Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Business Development at Disney (2005-2010) and as President of TiVo (2003-2005). Previously, Mr. Yudkovitz was President of two divisions at NBC, a key member of the teams that developed and launched the CNBC and MSNBC networks. Director since 2015. Age 62.

With over 30 years of experience in the broadcast and media entertainment industries, Mr. Yudkovitz brings to the Board relevant industry experience, which makes him a valuable asset to the Board as a member of the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, Mr. Yudkovitz's previous experience leading large strategic business innovation initiatives at both NBC and Disney makes him a valuable advisor to the Company’s management team on key areas of growth.

Martin J. Yudkovitz
zrnoa03.jpg
Mr. Zrno is retired. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of IXC Communications, Inc. (a telecommunications company) from June 1999 through November 1999. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of ALC Communications Corporation from 1988 through 1995. Director since 1999. Age 78.

With over 40 years of experience in the telecommunications industry and his past experience as the chief executive officer of two large telecommunications corporations, Mr. Zrno brings to the Board demonstrated management and leadership ability. In addition, Mr. Zrno has gained valuable experience dealing with accounting principles, financial reporting regulations and evaluating financial results of large corporations. This experience makes him a valuable asset to the Board as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and Governance and Nominating Committee.
John M. Zrno
torbecka03.jpg
Mr. Torbeck was named Chief Executive Officer of Cincinnati Bell Inc. effective January 31, 2013. He also served as President from January 31, 2013 until September 1, 2016. He joined Cincinnati Bell in 2010 as President and General Manager of Cincinnati Bell Communications Group. Prior to joining Cincinnati Bell, Mr. Torbeck was Chief Executive Officer of the Freedom Group and also worked for 28 years for the General Electric Company (“GE”), where he served as the Vice President of Operations for GE Industrial Business, President and CEO of GE’s Rail Services business and Vice President of Global Supply Chain for GE Aviation. Director since January 2013. Age 60.

Mr. Torbeck brings to the Board critical knowledge and understanding of the products and services offered by the Company and a strong understanding of the telecommunications industry. Mr. Torbeck’s prior business and management experience also provides the Board with a valuable perspective on managing a successful business.
Theodore H. Torbeck

16



Stock Ownership

Ownership of Equity Securities of the Company

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of common shares and 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares as of March 6, 2017July 27, 2020 (except as otherwise noted) by (i) each current director and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 33,36, and (ii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each named director and executive officer is c/o Cincinnati Bell Inc. at the Company's address.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Common Shares

Beneficially

Owned as of

July 27, 2020

(a)

 

 

Percent of

Common Shares

(b)

 

 

Depositary Shares Representing

6-3/4% Cumulative

Convertible

Preferred Shares

Beneficially

Owned as of

July 27, 2020

(c)

 

 

Percent of Depositary Shares Representing

6-3/4%

Cumulative

Convertible

Preferred

Shares

(c)

Meredith J. Ching

 

 

28,784

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Christi H. Cornette

 

 

21,722

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Phillip R. Cox

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Walter A. Dods, Jr.

 

 

26,541

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

John W. Eck

 

 

33,726

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Leigh R. Fox

 

 

112,953

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Jakki L. Haussler

 

 

53,535

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

 

24,112

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Craig F. Maier

 

 

53,493

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Russel P. Mayer

 

 

38,115

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Thomas E. Simpson

 

 

29,450

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Theodore H. Torbeck

 

 

270,591

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Lynn A. Wentworth

 

 

56,876

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Christopher J. Wilson

 

 

97,995

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Martin J. Yudkovitz

 

 

39,998

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

All directors and executive officers as a group

   (consisting of 17 persons, including those

   named above)

 

 

904,348

 

 

 

1.8

%

 

 

 

 

*

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 
Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned as of
March 6, 2017
(a)
 
Percent of
Common Shares
(b)
 
6  3/4%
Convertible
Preferred Shares
Beneficially
Owned as of
March 6, 2017
(c)
 
Percent of 6 3/4%
Cumulative
Convertible
Preferred
Shares
(c)
Phillip R. Cox 13,748
 *  *
Joshua T. Duckworth 8,940
 *  *
John W. Eck 9,376
 *  *
Leigh R. Fox 56,601
 *  *
Jakki L. Haussler 29,185
 *  *
Andrew R. Kaiser 5,890
 *  *
Craig F. Maier 29,144
 *  *
Russel P. Mayer 13,765
 *  *
Thomas E. Simpson 11,227
 *  *
Theodore H. Torbeck 273,595
 *  *
Lynn A. Wentworth 28,553
 *  *
Christopher J. Wilson 46,495
 *  *
Martin J. Yudkovitz 8,148
 *  *
John M. Zrno (d) 37,418
 *  *
All directors and executive officers as a group
   (consisting of the 13 persons named above)
 572,085
 1.4%  *

*

*

indicates ownership of less than 1% of issued and outstanding shares.shares

(a)

(a)

Includes common shares subject to outstanding options under the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan as of July 27, 2020, and common shares subject to restricted stock units under the 2007 Directors Plan and the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 19972017 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors that are exercisable as of March 6, 2017.scheduled to vest in accordance with their terms within 60 days following July 27, 2020. The following common shares subject to outstanding options are included in the totals:   1,800 common shares for Mr. Cox; 360 common shares for Mr. Duckworth; 300 common shares for Mr. Fox; 1,001 common shares for Mr. Kaiser; 23,877 common shares for Mr. Torbeck;and 19,102 common shares for Mr. Wilson; and 1,800Wilson.  The Company's Insider Trading Policy expressly prohibits ownership of derivative financial instruments or participation in investment strategies that hedge the economic risk of owning the Company's common shares and prohibits officers and directors from pledging Company securities as collateral for Mr. Zrno.loans.

(b)

(b)

These percentages are based upon 42,131,33450,680,605 common shares outstanding as of March 6, 2017, the Record Date.July 27, 2020.

(c)

(c)

These numbers represent the depositary shares representing interests in 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares. In the aggregate, the 155,250 issued and outstanding 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares are represented by 3,105,000 depositary shares, and each 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share is represented by 20 depositary shares.


(d)Amount includes 5,000 common shares held by the Zrno Family Limited Partnership.


17



Principal Shareholders

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of common shares as of December 31, 2016July 27, 2020 (except as otherwise noted) by each beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the common shares or 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares (or depositary shares representing one-twentieth of a 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share) outstanding known by the Company.  No beneficial owner owns more than five percent (5%) of the 6 3/4% Cumulative Preferred Shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Common Shares

Beneficially

Owned

 

 

 

Percent of

Common Shares

(a)

 

 

Depositary Shares Representing

6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares Beneficially Owned as of July 27, 2020 (b)

 

 

 

Percent of Depositary Shares Representing

6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred

Shares

(b)

 

BlackRock, Inc.

 

 

7,440,629

 

(c)

 

14.68%

 

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

55 East 52nd Street

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nomura Holdings, Inc.

 

 

4,865,764

 

(d)

 

9.60%

 

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

9-1 Nihonbashi, 1-Chome, Chuo-ku

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tokyo MO 103-8645, Japan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

 

 

3,213,705

 

(e)

 

6.34%

 

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

PO Box 2600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valley Forge,  PA 19482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Suisse AG/

 

 

3,089,956

 

(f)

 

6.10%

 

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

PO Box 900 CH 8070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zurich, Switzerland V8 CH 8070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Private Management Group, Inc.

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

190,723

 

(g)

 

6.14%

 

15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Irvine, CA 92618

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 
Common Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 
Percent of
Common Shares
GAMCO Investors, Inc. and affiliates 5,185,234
(a)12.37%
One Corporate Center    
Rye, NY 10580    
BlackRock, Inc. 5,809,178
(b)13.80%
55 East 52nd Street    
New York, NY 10055    
The Vanguard Group 5,693,502
(c)13.54%
100 Vanguard Blvd.    
Malvern, PA 19355    
Pinnacle Associates, Ltd. 2,152,162
(d)5.10%
335 Madison Avenue, Suite 1100    
New York, NY 10017    

*

*Indicates

indicates ownership of less than 1%5%, or the equivalent of 5% in share count, of common shares or 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares.

(a)

These percentages are based upon 50,680,605 common shares outstanding as of July 27, 2020.

(b)

These numbers represent the depositary shares representing interests in 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares.  In the aggregate, the 155,250 issued and outstanding class of6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares are represented by 3,105,000 depositary shares, and each 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share is represented by 20 depositary shares.

(c)

(a)

As reported on Schedule 13D/A13F filed on December 4, 2014May 1, 2020 by GAMCO Investors,BlackRock, Inc., as of December 3, 2014, Gabelli Funds, LLCMarch 31, 2020, BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power for 2,169,370 common7,440,629 shares GAMCO Asset Management Inc. hasand sole voting power for 2,645,5837,371,135 common shares and sole dispositive power for 2,796,473 common shares, MJG Associates,shares.  

(d)

As reported on Schedule 13F filed on May 15, 2020 by Nomura Holdings, Inc., as of March 31, 2020, Nomura Holdings, Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power for 6,0004,865,764 common shares, Mario J. Gabelli has sole voting and dispositive power for 1,400 common shares, Teton Advisors Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power for 150,001 common shares, Gabelli Securities, Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power for 60,310 common shares and GAMCO Investors Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power for 1,680 common shares. The amount of shares reported on Schedule 13D/A filed on December 4, 2014 by GAMCO Investors Inc. have been translated to reflect the 5 for 1 Reverse Stock Split.

(e)

(b)

As reported on Schedule 13G/A13F filed on January 12, 2017May 15, 2020 by BlackRock,The Vanguard Group, Inc., as of DecemberMarch 31, 2016, BlackRock,2020, The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power for 5,709,013 common shares and sole dispositive power for 5,809,1783,156,994 common shares.

(c)As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2017 by The Vanguard Group, as of December 31, 2016, The Vanguard Group hasshares, sole voting power for 50,443 common shares,dispositive and shared voting power for 8,487286 common shares, soleshared dispositive power with Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co. and shared voting power for 5,636,67240,198 common shares and shared dispositive power with Vanguard Global Advisers, LLC for 56,83016,227 common shares.

(f)

(d)

As reported on the Schedule 13G13F filed on February 10, 2017May 13, 2020 by Pinnacle Associates, Ltd.Credit Suisse AG/, as of DecemberMarch 31, 2016, Pinnacle Associates Ltd.2020, Credit Suisse AG/ has shared voting and dispositive power with Credit Suisse International and sole voting power for 2,152,162188,470 common shares, shared dispositive power with Credit Suisse Capital LLC and sole voting power for 2,901,176 common shares and shared dispositive power with Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and sole voting power for 310 common shares.


(g)

As reported on the Schedule 13F filed on May 13, 2020 by Private Management Group, Inc., as of March 31, 2020, Private Management Group, Inc. has sole dispositive and voting power for 190,723 depositary shares, each representing one-twentieth of a 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share.

18



Section 16(a) Beneficial OwnershipOwnership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required by regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Such reports are filed on Forms 3, 4 and 5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based solely on the Company’s review of the copies of such forms received by it, the Company believes that, during the period commencing January 1, 20162019 and ending December 31, 2016,2019, all such persons complied on a timely basis with the filing requirements of Section 16(a).



Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Named Executive Officers

The Company's 20162019 named executive officers (“NEOs”) were:

Theodore H. TorbeckChief Executive Officer*
Andrew R. KaiserChief Financial Officer**

Leigh R. Fox

President and Chief Operating Officer***Executive Officer

Andrew R. Kaiser

Chief Financial Officer

Thomas E. Simpson

Senior Vice President and

Chief TechnologyOperating Officer

Christi H. Cornette

Chief Culture Officer

Christopher J. Wilson

Vice President and General Counsel

Joshua T. DuckworthVice President, Investor Relations and Controller

*Mr. Torbeck served as President until September 1, 2016. Effective May 31, 2017 Mr. Torbeck will retire as Chief Executive Officer from the Company and will no longer be an employee of the Company.
**Mr. Kaiser was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on September 1, 2016.
***Mr. Fox served as the Chief Financial Officer until his appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer on September 1, 2016. Effective May 31, 2017 Mr. Fox will be President and Chief Executive Officer.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) discusses the elements of our executive compensation program and the reasons why the Compensation Committee selected those particular elements, the performance metrics and goals under certain of those elements, the compensation that the executives might earn, and how each element encourages the Company's achievement of its business objectives and strategy.

The Company utilizes certain non-GAAP financial measures in order to compensate NEOs.  The reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Unlevered Operating Cash Flow to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is presented in the following tables. Certain other adjustments may be made for items not contemplated as part of the target goals, such as the results associated with the acquisition of Hawaiian Telcom.  All adjustments are approved by the Board.

 

 

Year ended

December 31,

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

Net loss (GAAP)

 

$

(66.6

)

Add:

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

(10.6

)

Interest expense

 

 

139.6

 

Other income, net

 

 

(0.5

)

Other components of pension and postretirement benefit plans expense

 

 

11.2

 

Operating Income (GAAP)

 

$

73.1

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

 

304.9

 

Restructuring and severance related charges

 

 

6.9

 

Transaction and integrations costs

 

 

12.8

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

7.4

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

405.1

 

 

 

Year ended

December 31,

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2019

 

Operating cash flow (GAAP)

 

$

259.1

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

 

129.3

 

Transaction and integrations payments

 

 

7.0

 

Adjusted Unlevered Operating Cash Flow

 

$

395.4

 




19



Executive Summary

Our goal is to link the executive compensation program to the Company’s strategic plan and the long-term interests of its shareholders.  The Company’s long-term strategy is to become a leading technology company with state of the artstate-of-the-art fiber assets providing end-to-end communications services (high speed data, video and voice solutions) and IT systemsinfrastructure and solutions.  The Company’s strategic goals are to:

Continue to

expand our local fiber network.network; and

Grow

grow our IT services and hardware business.segment.

Monetize our remaining CyrusOne investment.

Consequently, the Company’s executive compensation program ties a significant portion of an executive’s realized annual compensation to the Company’s achievement of financial and strategic goals.  For 2016,2019, the key financial measures utilized to assess annual performance are revenue and Adjusted EBITDA and the("EBITDA"). The key financial measures utilized to assess long-term performance areinclude a combination of strategic revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and return on invested capital (“ROIC”("ROIC")., operating cash flow and total shareholder return ("TSR"), depending on the year the long-term incentive award was granted.  In addition, for certain long-term incentive awards, the Company will adjust the final long-term performance payout using a TSR factor based on the Company's TSR performance as compared to the Russell 2000 index.  See pages 2326 - 2629 for a detailed discussion of the payments made under the annual and long-term incentive plans for 20162019 performance. In addition, the Company will continue to adjust the final long-term performance payout using a total shareholder return (“TSR”) factor based on the Company’s TSR performance as compared to the Russell 2000 index.

For 2016,2019, the Company achieved the following financial and operational objectives:

results:

Consolidated revenue increased $18

Revenue totaled $1,537 million, an increase of $159 million compared to the prior year and revenue from strategic products was up 19 percent year-over-year.

Adjusted EBITDA totaled $305$405 million, up $3an increase of $33 million compared to 2015.the prior year

Operating income totaled $73 million, down $10 million compared to the prior year

Hawaiian Telcom contributed revenue of $347 million, an increase of $172 million compared to the prior year

Hawaiian Telcom contributed Adjusted EBITDA of $99 million, an increase of $52 million compared to the prior year

Cincinnati Fioptics revenue totaled $353 million, up $12 million from a year ago

IT Services and Hardware Adjusted EBITDA totaled $54 million, down $9 million from the prior year

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $259 million, up $44 million as compared to the prior year

Free cash flow totaled $46 million, up $5 million year-over-year

Fiber-to-the-premise (“FTTP”) internet subscribers increased by approximately 17,700 in Cincinnati and 3,800 in Hawaii compared to the prior year

Continued the construction of its fiber network. Fiopticsnetwork and passed an additional 12,500 addresses with FTTP in Cincinnati, which is now available to 67%approximately 60% of Greater Cincinnati.

Proceeds from the $625 million of 7% senior notes due 2024 were used to redeem 8 3/8% senior notes due 2020 and to repay a portion of the outstanding Corporate Credit Agreement Tranche B Term Loan.
Sold 4.1 million common sharesCincinnati’s addressable market and 6,500 addresses with FTTP in Hawaii, which is now available to approximately 35% of CyrusOne for proceedsHawaii’s total addressable market

As a result of $190 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, the Company liquidated our remaining 2.8 million common shares for proceeds of $141 million.


Theseabove achievements, resulted in the NEOs being paidearned their annual incentives above target onand their annual and long-term performance incentives.
incentives below target.

We believe that our 20162019 results confirm that the Company’s executive compensation program effectively focuses our key executive talent on achieving our strategic revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and ROICkey financial goals over multiple years and aligns executive long-term incentive rewards with the interests of shareholders. The mix of base pay (the “fixed cost” of the program) and both annual and long-term incentive plans promote achievement of current-year goals and longer-term business strategies while driving appropriate business behavior without inducing executives to take undue business risks.


20



The following chart summarizes the key elements of our compensation program, which are discussed in more detail later in the CD&A.


Component

Purpose

Key Characteristics

2016

2019 Key Actions

Base Salary

• Allows Company to attract and retain executives


• Recognizes individual performance through merit increases


• Recognizes individual work experience and level of responsibility

• Fixed annual cash compensation


• Increases primarily driven by individual performance and by market positioning


• Used to calculate other components of compensation

Messrs. Fox and Kaiser receivedWhile the Company reviews salary market data for all non-union employees on an annual basis, it follows a practice of providing merit increases in September in conjunctionon an 18-24 month basis.

• In keeping
with their promotions


• Mr. Simpsonthis practice, all NEOS received a 3% merit increase in September to reflect his increased responsibilities and for retention purposes
their base salaries in 2019.

Annual Incentives

• Motivate achievement of Company annual financial goals and strategic objectives


• Motivate achievement of  individual annual performance goals

• Performance-based annual cash incentive compensation


• Annual incentive target set as a percentage of base salary

• The revenue and Adjusted EBITDA performance metrics, which affect 80% of incentive payout, were attained at approximately 86%100.5% and 104%100%, respectively, of target. Together with the individual performance portion, NEO total annual incentive payouts ranged from 103% to 120%were 121% of target


target.

Mr. DuckworthAnnual incentives for NEOs are set as a percentage of base salary.  Since the NEOs received an increasebase salary increases of 3% in his2019, their annual incentive target in January

targets for 2019 also increased by 3%.

Non-qualified

Performance-Based and Time-Based Restricted Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)Unit Awards

• Align executive interests with shareholder interests

• Motivate achievement of Company long-term financial goals and strategic objectives


• Facilitate executive equity ownership thereby further aligning executive and shareholder interests

• Performance-based long-term equity incentive compensation
• Vest over three-year period based on continued service and the achievement of performance goals

• Does not have value unless stock price increases following date of grant
• No stock options or stock appreciation rights were granted to any NEO in 2016



Performance-Based and Time-Based Restricted Stock and Unit Awards
• Motivate achievement of Company long-term financial goals and strategic objectives

• Facilitate executive equity ownership thereby further aligning executive and shareholder interests

• Retain key executives


• Performance-based stock and unit awards provide performance-based long-term equity incentive compensation (with vesting based on both continued service and achievement of performance goals)

GrantedPerformance-based stock unit awards are granted annually with cumulative three-year performance cycles

• Restricted stock units are time-based and vest on the 3rd anniversary of the grant date

2016With the exception of Ms. Cornette and Mr. Wilson, the remaining NEOs received increases in their 2019 long-term incentive targets in line with changes to market data for their respective positions.

• 2019 grants consist of time-based restricted stock units (25%(50%) and performance-based stock units (75%(50%)

.

20162019 results will be calculated for each performance period (2016, 2016-2017(2019, 2019-2020 and 2016-2018)2019-2021), with a single payment at the end of the 3-year performance period


• In 2016, ROIC was added as a performance measure

period.


The Company also provides certain retirement benefits and post-termination compensation to the NEOs, as described in more detail later in this CD&A.


21



Compensation Practices

The Company reviews and modifies its executive compensation program and practices regularly to address changes in the Company's short- and long-term business objectives and strategies, new regulatory standards and to implement evolving best practices.  Listed below are compensation practices that the Company has adopted in support of its pay-for-performancecompensation philosophy:

Performance-Based Compensation.  The Company believes that a significant percentage of each NEO's total compensation should be performance-based or “at-risk.”  Base salary was only 22%18% of the Chief Executive Officer's 20162019 target compensation and 38%34% of the other NEOs' 20162019 target compensation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.  The Company believes that equity ownership creates alignment between executive and shareholder interests.  In support of this objective, we maintain stock ownership guidelines under which our NEOs are expected to accumulate specified ownership stakes over time.  See pages 29 - 30page 34 for a more detailed discussion.

Compensation Risk Assessment.  The Company conducts annual compensation risk assessments to ensure that our policies and programs do not unintentionally encourage inappropriate behaviors or lead to excessive risk taking.  We have concluded that our compensation plans, policies and practices do not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Repricing Prohibition.  We maintain prohibitions against the repricing of underwater stock options in the absence of shareholder approval.  The definition of a repricing includes cash buyouts of underwater stock options and stock appreciation rights. This change applies to all grants, including existing grantsgrants..

Double-Trigger Equity Vesting. Existing employment agreements with executives incorporate a “double-trigger” requirement for vesting equity grants in the event of a change in control (“CIC”).  The Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "2007 Long Termand the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan") and revised award agreements, beginning with the 2014 equity grants,Plan provide that, in the event of a CIC,change in control ("CIC"), an employee must be involuntarily terminated without cause by the Company during the 24-month period following a CIC for previously granted equity awards that are continued, assumed or substituted to vest. The proposed Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan contains comparable “double trigger” provisions.

Executive Compensation Benchmarking.  The Company (i) uses the general industry peer group as the primary source of market data for competitive assessments of executive pay, (ii) uses thea peer group consisting of 19 telecommunications peer groupand IT services companies (the “Telecommunications Peer Group”), as shown in Schedule 1 on page 60, as a secondary reference for assessing market pay and industry compensation practices, and (iii) each year reviews and modifies, if necessary, the telecommunications peer groupTelecommunications Peer Group to make certain that it is an appropriate peer group for comparisons to Cincinnati Bell.  We target each pay component and total pay at the 50th percentile.

Hedging and Pledging Policy.  The Company's Insider Trading Policy expressly prohibits ownership of derivative financial instruments or participation in investment strategies that hedge the economic risk of owning the Company's common stock and prohibits officers and directors from pledging Company securities as collateral for loans.

Clawback Policy.  The Company has a clawback policy that allows it to recover incentive payments to or realized by executive officers in the event that the incentive compensation was based on the achievement of financial results that are subsequently restated to correct any accounting error due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, and such restatement results in a lower payment or award.

Independent Compensation Committee.  Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent as defined in the corporate governance listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"),NYSE, and the Company's director independence standards mirror those of the NYSE.

Independent Compensation Consultant.  The Compensation Committee utilizes the services of an outside independent compensation consultant to assist in its duties.  The Compensation Committee's consultant performs no other services for the Company or its management.

Elimination of Gross-Ups.  The Compensation Committee has a policy in place that any new or materially amended employment agreement with any NEO will not contain any excise tax gross-up provisions with respect to payments contingent on a CIC. In addition, no current employment agreements have been amended to removecontain any excise tax gross-up provisions.



22



2016

2019 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

In response to feedback from shareholders and the proxy advisory firms, the

The Compensation Committee implemented a number of changes to the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan and to the terms of the awards granted under the Plan in 2014 and subsequent years. The Company believes that these changes were well received by its largest shareholders and are generally seen as a more balanced approach to aligning managementexecutives' compensation with shareholder return.return is a key to a balanced approach.  In 2016,2019, the long-term incentive compensation plan awards for executives consisted of a mix of time-based restricted stock units were included as partand performance-based stock units.  Having both components linked to Company stock provides greater alignment with shareholders, with the time-based restricted stock units creating an element of the long-term awards to help retainretention for key executive talent.

In 2016,2019, approximately 69%98% of the shares voted with respect to the Company's say-on-pay proposal voted "for" approval of the Company's executive compensation.  The Compensation Committee consideredChief Executive Officer, the concerns expressed byChief Financial Officer and other members of senior management held five meetings in 2019 with key investors to reinforce the proxy advisory firms in their 2016 reports onCompany's strategic direction and the Company’s say-on-pay proposalBoard's refreshment process.  In addition, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and contacted our top 25 shareholders. No additional information or meetings were requested asother senior managers hosted teleconferences with several of the Company's largest shareholders following each quarterly earnings call to discuss the Company's strategy and financial results.

The Company's outreach program also provides an opportunity for any of its shareholders to request a result of our outreach efforts.

The Company will continue its annual outreach efforts, whereinmeeting with one or more of the Chairman of the Board, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and certain members of senior management will be available to meet directly with any of the Company’s major shareholders to obtain feedback on the Company’s strategic direction as well as its executive compensation program.

Compensation Program Objectives

The executive compensation program's primary objectives are:

To attract and retain high-quality executives by offering competitive compensation packages;

To motivate and reward executives for the attainment of financial and strategic goals, both short-term and long-term, thereby increasing the Company's value while at the same time discouraging unnecessary or excessive risk-taking; and

To align the interests of the executives and the shareholders by attributing a significant portion of total executive compensation to the achievement of specific short-term and long-term performance goals set by the Compensation Committee.

Elements of Compensation

Base Salary

Base salaries are provided to the Company's NEOs for performing their day-to-day responsibilities.  The base salaries of our NEOs are based on a review of the competitive market median for comparable executive positions, assessment by the Chief Executive Officer (or in the case of the Chief Executive Officer's base salary, by the Compensation Committee and entire Board) of the executive's performance as compared to his or her individual job responsibilities, the salary level required to attract and retain the executive and such other factors as the Chief Executive Officer or the Compensation Committee deems relevant for such executive.  Generally, no one factor is given more weight than another, nor does the Company and the Compensation Committee use a formulaic approach in setting executive pay.  Additionally, while the Company looks at 50th percentile total compensation, it also considers the executive’s individual performance as well in determining salary adjustments.

Messrs. Fox and Kaiser

While the Company reviews salary market data for all non-union employees on an annual basis, it follows a practice of providing merit increases on an 18-24 month basis.  In keeping with this practice, the NEOs received 3% increases into their base salary and annual incentive targets effective September 1, 2016salaries in conjunction with their promotions. Mr. Simpson received increases in his base salary and annual incentive target effective September 1, 2016 in recognition of his performance, his expanded responsibilities and as part of a retention effort. Mr. Duckworth received an increase in his annual incentive target effective January 1, 2016 in conjunction with the annual review process.

2019.

Annual Incentives

Annual incentives are intended to motivate and reward senior executives for achieving the short-term business objectives of the Company.  Annual incentives are payable for the achievement of annual financial performance goals established by the Compensation Committee and for individual performance.  For the NEOs, financial performance goals represent 80% of the annual incentive determination and the individual performance evaluation represents 20%. Payouts, if any, can range from 0% to 150% of the total target annual incentive, depending on the level of achievement of financial goals between threshold and superior levels of performance and evaluations of individual performance and contributions for the year.  The Board and Compensation Committee approve financial goals annually which reflect their belief that achievement of these goals drives the Company's strategic success.


23



The Company used the following goals having the indicated weights in 2016:

2019:

60% on Adjusted EBITDA;

20% on revenue; and

20% on revenue; and

20% on individual performance.

The Company has selected Adjusted EBITDA and revenue as its performance measures.  Investors have identified these metrics as key indicators of current financial performance and the Company's ability to execute on its strategy of creating a technology company with state of the artstate-of-the-art fiber assets servicing customers with data, video, voice and IT solutions to meet their evolving needs.  Adjusted EBITDA is given a significantly higher weighting than revenue and individual performance because it is a key measure of profitability of the Company that eliminates the effects of accounting and financing decisions.  In addition, investors view it as an effective barometer of how well a company can service its debt.

The Board and Compensation Committee review and approve the annual incentive attainment percentages for both Adjusted EBITDA and revenue. In conjunction with such review, they may adjust the actual result or goal amount to reflect a change in business strategy, reallocation of Company resources or an unanticipated event.

The Adjusted EBITDA and revenue goals are assessed independently of each other and are scaled above and below their respective targets.  The scale for 20162019 targets is set forth below:

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA Goal

 

 

Revenue Goal

 

Percentage of Criterion Achieved

 

Percentage

of Target

Incentive

Goal

 

 

Percentage of

Total Annual

Incentive

Paid

 

 

Percentage

of Target

Incentive

Goal

 

 

Percentage of

Total Annual

Incentive

Paid

 

Below 95%

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

 

 

0

%

95%

 

 

50

%

 

 

30

%

 

 

50

%

 

 

10

%

100%

 

 

100

%

 

 

60

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

20

%

110%

 

 

125

%

 

 

75

%

 

 

125

%

 

 

25

%

120% or greater

 

 

150

%

 

 

90

%

 

 

150

%

 

 

30

%

Percentage of
Criterion Achieved
 Adjusted EBITDA Goal Revenue Goal
Percentage of
Target Incentive
Goal
 
Percentage of
Total Annual
Incentive
Paid
 
Percentage of
Target Incentive
Goal
 
Percentage of
Total Annual
Incentive
Paid
Below 95% 0%
 0%
 0%
 0%
95% 50% 30% 50% 10%
100% 100% 60% 100% 20%
110% 125% 75% 125% 25%
120% or greater 150% 90% 150% 30%

The 20162019 target annual incentives for each of the NEOs at year-end are set forth below:

Named Executive Officer

Target Annual Incentive

as a Percentage of Base Salary

Theodore H. Torbeck

Leigh R. Fox

100%

Andrew R. Kaiser

65%

100%

Leigh R. Fox100%

Thomas E. Simpson

100%

Christi H. Cornette

100%

Christopher J. Wilson

100%

Joshua T. Duckworth

60%

In 2016,2019, for annual incentive purposes, the chart below sets out the Adjusted EBITDA and revenue target goals and actual results, whichadjusted for items not contemplated as part of the target goals.  These results produced a weighted-average payout for the financial portion of approximately 99.5%81% of target:

Financial Objective

 

2019

Threshold

Performance

Level

 

 

2019 Adjusted

Target

 

2019 Superior

Performance

Level

 

 

2019 Actual

Results

Adjusted EBITDA

 

95%

 

 

$

405M

 

 

120%

 

 

$

407M

 

Revenue

 

95%

 

 

$

1.537B

 

 

120%

 

 

$

1.537B

 

Financial Objective    
2016 Threshold Performance Level 2016 Adjusted Target 2016 Superior Performance Level 2016 Actual Results
Adjusted EBITDA 95% $303 M 120% $305 M
Revenue 95% $1.20 B 120% $1.19 B

24




The Chief Executive Officer provides the Compensation Committee with his assessment of each other executive officer's individual performance. The Chief Executive Officer reviews, for each executive officer, the performance of the executive's department, the quality of the executive's advice and counsel on matters within the executive's purview, qualitative peer feedback and the effectiveness of the executive's communication with the organization and with the Chief Executive Officer on matters of topical concern. These factors are evaluated subjectively and are not assigned specific individual weight.weights. The Chief Executive Officer then recommends an award for the individual performance-based portion for each of the other NEO's annual incentive, which can range from 0% to 200% of the target award for such portion.


The Compensation Committee meets in executive session to consider the Chief Executive Officer's individual performance. The Compensation Committee evaluates the information obtained from the other directors concerning the Chief Executive Officer's individual performance, based on a discussion led by the Chairman of the Board. Factors considered include: operational and financial performance, succession planning, development of the Company leadership team, development of business opportunities and community involvement/relationships. The Compensation Committee has discretion in evaluating the Chief Executive Officer's performance and may recommend to the full Board a discretionary increase or decrease to the Chief Executive Officer's final annual incentive award as the Compensation Committee believes is warranted.

The table below shows the percentage of target annual incentive earned by each NEO for 20162019 for each performance measure and in total as well as the actual award payment:

Named Executive Officer

 

Total

Company

Adjusted

EBITDA

 

 

Total

Company

Revenue

 

 

Individual

Performance

 

Total Annual

Incentive Award

 

 

Total Annual

Incentive Award

Payment

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

 

100.5

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

200

%

 

 

121%

 

 

$

809,025

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

 

100.5

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

200

%

 

 

121%

 

 

$

497,490

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

 

100.5

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

200

%

 

 

121%

 

 

$

559,676

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

 

100.5

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

200

%

 

 

121%

 

 

$

472,616

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

 

100.5

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

200

%

 

 

121%

 

 

$

457,691

 

Named Executive Officer Total Company Revenue Total Company Adjusted EBITDA Individual Performance 

Total Annual
Incentive Award
 Total Annual Incentive Award Payment
Theodore H. Torbeck 86.2% 103.7% 200% 120% $926,900
Andrew R. Kaiser (a) 86.2% 103.7% 120% 103% $145,842
Leigh R. Fox (b) 86.2% 103.7% 200% 120% $505,848
Thomas E. Simpson (b) 86.2% 103.7% 200% 120% $385,148
Christopher J. Wilson 86.2% 103.7% 150% 110% $387,546
Joshua T. Duckworth 86.2% 103.7% 175% 115% $141,646
(a)Mr. Kaiser's award reflects the total amount he earned in 2016, which includes prorated targets and the resulting payments under the Management annual incentive plan from January 1, through August 31, 2016 and the NEO annual incentive plan from September 1 through December 31, 2016.
(b)Awards for Messrs. Fox and Simpson reflect the payout based on their prorated annual incentive targets in 2016.

Long-Term Incentives

The long-term incentives granted to NEOs in 20162019 consist of performance stock units and restricted stock units.  Long-term incentives are intended to encourage the Company's executives to focus on and achieve the long-term (three-year) business goals of the Company and to aid their development and retention through share ownership and recognition of future performance.  An executive's realization of his or her long-term incentive means that the Company has also performed in accordance with its plan over a long-term period. The total annual long-term incentive opportunity for each NEO is established by the Compensation Committee or, in the case of the CEO, by the Compensation Committee and the entire Board, in terms of dollars.  In administering the long-term incentive program, the Compensation Committee considers competitive market data (as discussed on pages 2731 - 28)33) and the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding each executive's performance and specific individual accomplishments.  For each type of award, the number of performance shares/performance-based stock units and/or restricted stock units to grant is determined by dividing the approved aggregate award amount by the closing price of a share of common stock on the day the Board approves the financial results.  The Compensation Committee's policy is not to grant more than 400,0002,000,000 shares per year in connection with long-term incentive awards under the 20072017 Long Term Incentive Plan. To the extent that the settlement of the long-term incentive awards in any year exceeds 400,000 shares, the excess portion of the incentives are settled in cash.

Stock Options/SARs

No stock options or SARsstock appreciation rights ("SARs") were granted to any NEO in 2016.


25



2019.

Performance-Based and Time-Based Restricted Stock and Unit Awards

Performance-based and time-based awards for 20162019 were granted in the form of performance stock units and restricted stock units.

Restricted stock units will be paid in common shares at the end of a three-year vesting period.

Like

As was the 2014practice in 2017 and 2015 awards,2018, the performanceperformance-based stock units granted in 20162019 are structured to be paid in common shares, cash equal to the fair market value of common shares or a combination thereof, at the end of a three-year performance period and are based on the achievement of specific Company quantitative goals over such three-year performance period.  Such awards were granted during the first quarter of each calendar year following finalization and approval by the entire Board of the financial goal(s)goals for the next three-year performance period.  For the 2014 and 20152017 awards, performance goal attainment will be based on the achievement of the specific Company quantitative goals for each of the three-year performance periodperiods (2017, 2017-2018 and 2017-2019) as approved by the entire Board.Board, with a single payout at the end of the three-year performance period.  For the 20162018 awards, performance goal attainment will be based on the achievement of the specific Company quantitative goals on a cumulative basis for each of the performance periods (2016, 2016-2017(2018, 2018-2019 and 2016-2018)2018-2020) as approved by the entire Board, with a single payout at the end of the three-year performance period.

For the 20142019 awards, performance goal attainment will be based on the achievement of the specific Company quantitative goals for each of the performance periods (2019, 2019-2020 and 2019-2021) as approved by the Board, with a single payout at the end of the three-year performance period.


For each of the 2017 performance periods (2017, 2017-2018 and 2017-2019), within the three-year performance cycle ending December 31, 2016 and the 2015 three-year performance cycle ending December 31, 2017,2019, Adjusted EBITDA, strategic revenue and unlevered cash return on assetsROIC are equally weighted.  For Adjusted EBITDA and strategic revenue, achievement must be at least 95% of the target goal in order to generate a threshold level payout equal to 50% of the target award for each executive.  For unlevered cash return on assets for the 2014-2016 and 2015-2017 performance cycles,ROIC, achievement must be at least 16.0%75% for the 2017 performance periods in order to generate a threshold level payout equal to 75% of the target award for each executive.  The final payout calculation for the 2014-2016 and 2015-20172017-2019 performance cyclesperiod is subject to a +/- 15% adjustment based on the Company’s  TSRtotal shareholder return ("TSR") over the three-year performance period compared to the Russell 2000 Index.  Achievement less than the 35th percentile of the Russell 2000 Index will result in a 15% reduction while achievement greater than the 65th percentile will result in a 15% increase.  For TSR results greater than the 35th percentile and less than the 65th percentile of the Russell 2000 index, the +/- 15% adjustment will be determined based on interpolation.

The threshold, target and superior performance levels are the same for

For each of the NEOs. Adjusted EBITDA, strategic revenue and unlevered cash return on assets (profitability) target goals for the 2014-2016 three-year performance period are shown in the table below:

2014-2016 Performance
 Cycle
      
Threshold Performance Level Target Superior Performance Level 
Actual
Results
 Percentage of Target (a)
Adjusted EBITDA 95.0% 100.0% 120.0% 99.8% 98.1%
Strategic Revenue 95.0% 100.0% 120.0% 105.9% 114.8%
Profitability 85.0% 100.0% 110.0% 96.9% 94.6%
(a)The maximum payout for the full 3-year performance cycle is 150%.

For each of the 20162018 performance periods (2016, 2016-2017(2018, 2018-2019 and 2016-2018)2018-2020) within the 3-yearthree-year performance cycle ending December 31, 2020, and each of the 2019 performance periods (2019, 2019-2020 and 2019-2021) within the three-year performance cycle ending December 31, 2021, 70% of the award payout is based on Adjusted Unlevered Operating Cash Flow ("Adjusted OCF"), with the remaining 30% based on the Company's TSR for each of the 2018 Adjusted EBITDA, strategic revenueperformance periods and ROIC are equally weighted.2019 performance periods compared to the Telecommunications Peer Group (as described on page 60) approved by the Compensation Committee as in effect on the last day of the respective performance period.  For Adjusted EBITDA and strategic revenue,OCF, achievement must be at least 95% of the target goal in order to generate a threshold level payoutpayment equal to 50% of this component of the target award for each executive.  For ROIC, achievementWith respect to the TSR component of the award, the Company's TSR for the respective performance period must be at least 77.0%in the 20th percentile when compared to the Telecommunications Peer Group in order to generate a threshold level payout equal to 75%25% of this component of the target award for each executive. The finalNEO (achievement above the 30th percentile is based on a sliding scale, with achievement of the 50th percentile generating a payout calculationat 100% and achievement of the 90th percentile or greater generating payout at 150% of this component of the target award for each NEO).  For purposes of the 2018 performance awards and 2019 performance awards, Adjusted OCF means the Employer’s Cash Flows from Operating Activities (as defined by U.S. GAAP) adjusted to exclude (1) cash paid for interest on (a) all long-term debt, (b) capital lease obligations, and (c) other financing arrangements for the 2016-2018Performance Period (computed on the basis of the Employer’s interest expense for purposes of the Employer’s applicable income statements as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less non-cash items); and (2) cash paid for transaction and integration costs.

The threshold, target and superior performance period is subject to a +/- 15% adjustmentlevels are the same for each of the NEOs.  For the 2017-2019 long-term incentive awards, each of the NEOs received 70.9% of their target awards based on the Company’s TSR overresults of the three-year performance period comparedcycle ending December 31, 2019 as shown in the table below, adjusted for the TSR results.

2017-2019

Performance

 

Threshold

Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

Superior

Performance

 

 

Actual Results (a)

 

Cycle

 

Level

 

 

Target

 

 

Level

 

 

2017

 

 

2017-2018

 

 

2017-2019

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

95.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

120.0%

 

 

99.3%

 

 

99.3%

 

 

98.7%

 

Strategic Revenue

 

95.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

120.0%

 

 

99.2%

 

 

97.2%

 

 

95.0%

 

ROIC

 

77.0%

 

 

100.0%

 

 

110.0%

 

 

108.0%

 

 

108.9%

 

 

106.7%

 

(a)

The maximum payout for the full 3-year performance cycle is 150%.

Business Value Program

On May 1, 2018, the Board approved a new management incentive program (the "Business Value Award Program") intended to reward key management of the Company  for growing, and creating significant enterprise value through such growth, in the IT Services and Hardware business of the Company (“IT Segment”).  The Business Value Award Program has been implemented through an award of Business Value Award “points”.  A “point” is a measure used to determine the amount of cash, if any, that could be distributed to a participating employee who receives such an award upon the occurrence of certain events. A form of Business Value Award Agreement (the “BVAP Agreement”) for the award of such points was approved by the Committee on May 1, 2018.  A maximum of 1,000 total points may be awarded to all employees participating in this Business Value Award Program.



The BVAP Agreement provides for a specified cash payment to the Russell 2000 Index. Achievement less thanparticipating employee in the 35event that (i) the employee is continuously employed for a two-year period after the date of grant, (ii) a qualifying transaction (as described below) involving the IT Segment is consummated before May 1, 2023, and (iii) the qualifying transaction generates a Net Value Created by the IT Segment (as described below). th percentileThe value of an award granted to a participating employee is equal to the number of points awarded to such employee multiplied by 0.001 multiplied by the Award Pool Amount (as described below).  For purposes of determining the amount of an award payable: (i) a “qualifying transaction” means a transaction that would result in the Company selling or transferring (including through an initial public offering) and ceasing to own at least 51% of the Russell 2000 Index will resultfair market value of the assets or equity of the IT Segment; (ii) the “Net Value Created by the IT Segment” means the total consideration received by the Company in a 15% reduction while achievement greater thanqualifying transaction less the 65th percentile will result in a 15% increase. For TSR results greater thancost of acquisitions and investments made by the 35th percentileCompany to inorganically grow the IT Segment (including the OnX Holdings acquisition); and less than(iii) the 65th percentile“Award Pool Amount” means an amount equal to 10% of the Russell 2000 index,Net Value Created by the +/- 15% adjustmentIT Segment. If a qualifying transaction does not occur before May 1, 2023, unless such date is extended because a qualifying transaction is in progress but has not yet closed, the Agreement terminates with no payment to the participating employee. Moreover, if the participating employee’s employment is terminated for any reason (other than a termination for the Employee’s retirement, death or disability), prior to the consummation of a qualifying transaction, then the employee will not receive any payment under the BVAP Agreement. In addition, if the qualifying transaction is a result of a “change in control” as defined in the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2017 LTIP”), the amount of any award payable pursuant to a BVAP Agreement may be determined based on interpolation.reduced by any “change in control” payment received by such participating employee under the 2017 LTIP.  The CEO was awarded 100 points and each of the other NEOs were awarded 50 points.


26



Benefits

NEOs hired prior to January 1, 2009 participate in the Cincinnati Bell Management Pension Plan (the "Management Pension Plan") on the same basis as all other eligible salaried and certain non-union hourly employees.  The Management Pension Plan is a qualified defined benefit plan with a nonqualified provision that applies to the extent that eligible earnings or benefits exceed the applicable Internal Revenue Code limits for qualified plans.  The Company makes all required contributions to this plan. However, as described on page 33,39, the Management Pension Plan is now frozen and no further credits, other than interest, are made to the plan.  The executives, along with all other salaried employees, also participate in a 401(k) savings plan, which includes a Company matching contribution feature that vests 100% of such matching contributions in the employee's account as they are made to the plan.

The value of the Company's retirement program is not considered in any of the compensation decisions made with respect to other elements of NEO compensation, because the Company believes that the alignment of the interests of executives and shareholders is most effectively accomplished through its short- and long-term incentive compensation programs.


Compensation Determination Process

Role of the Compensation Committee and Management in Recommending Compensation

As described in greater detail below, individual base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and long-term incentive grant amounts are determined within the framework of the executive's position and responsibility, individual performance and future leadership potential, as determined by the Chief Executive Officer in consultation with the Compensation Committee, or by the Compensation Committee and the entire Board in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, as well as with regard to the external marketplace.

The Chief Executive Officer presents compensation recommendations for the senior executives, including the other NEOs, to the Compensation Committee for its review and approval.  The Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer, determines his compensation, and discusses its recommendation with the entire Board in executive session before the entire Board grants its approval.

Determination of the Target Compensation Levels

In determining pay levels, the Company established a philosophy to target each component - base salary, target annual incentive and target long-term incentive - at the market 50th percentile appropriate to the revenue size of the Company.  In implementing this philosophy, the Compensation Committee considers and evaluates the following information:

An annual study of market compensation practices conducted by Willis Towers Watson, the Company’s compensation consultant, at the Company’s request, whereby it obtains, compiles and supplies to the Company and the Compensation Committee competitive compensation information concerning the companies in each of the two peer groupsas  described below.below:

Pay practices for executive officers of a peer group consisting of 142from Willis Towers Watson’s compensation survey, reflecting general industry companies across various industries with annuala broad range of revenue between $1 billion and $3 billionsizes (the "General Industry Peer Group"Survey"). The list of these companies is set forth in Schedule 1 attached to this proxy statement. These companies were chosen because they have annual revenue that is closely aligned with the Company's revenue size, and they provide the Company and the Compensation Committee with insight into general industry executive compensation practices.  Since executive compensation correlates to a company's annual revenue (i.e.(i.e., the higher a company's revenue, generally the higher the executive's market compensation), to neutralize this effect, the Company, in consultation with Willis Towers Watson, uses a statistical technique called "regression analysis1." to adjust the survey data to the Company’s revenue size.  The Compensation Committee approved the use of the General Industry Peer GroupSurvey information as the primary source for market competitive assessments of NEO pay levels for the following reasons:

1 Linear regression analysis is a statistical tool for determining the relationship between a dependent variable (in this case, target compensation levels) and an independent variable (in this case, revenue). The technique correlates median predicted pay for companies by taking into consideration their revenues (i.e., smaller revenue companies would have pay predicted based on their revenues rather than by a simple median of pay for all companies in the General Industry Peer Group). For each executive position whose compensation is assessed and set by the Compensation Committee (or the full Board, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer), Willis Towers Watson produces a predicted level for each pay component at the 50th percentile of companies based on Cincinnati Bell's revenues. The use of regression analysis allows the Compensation Committee to compare each executive's pay, both by pay component and in total, to the market 50th percentile of similar revenue-sized companies




27



The ever-changing landscape of the telecommunications industry and the difficulty in assessing year-over-year changes in executive compensation within these companies due to mergers, acquisitions, etc.;industry developments and other business changes;

The lack of a sufficient number of suitable telecommunications companies within the Willis Towers Watson database to secure adequate pay survey data, resulting in the need to use proxy data for some telecommunications companies; and

The absence of pay data in the proxies for certain NEO positions.

Pay practices for executive officers of a peer group consisting of 19 telecommunications companies (the "Telecommunicationsthe Telecommunications Peer Group").Group.  Because of the reasons noted above, the Compensation Committee uses the information about the Telecommunications Peer Group as a secondary source for monitoring compensation trends to provide reasonable assurance that using the General Industry Peer GroupSurvey data for comparative analysis does not cause an aberration of the Company's executive compensation at the 50th percentile.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the list of companies in each peer group to make certain the list is appropriate, and, after review, the Compensation Committee approved the Telecommunications Peer Group.  The Telecommunications Peer Group used in 20162019 is shown in Schedule 21 on page 60. For 2016,

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the list of companies in the Telecommunications Peer Group added Shenandoah Telecommunications Co.Group.

1 Regression analysis is a statistical tool for determining the relationship between a dependent variable (in this case, target compensation levels) and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc.an independent variable (in this case, revenue).  The technique correlates median predicted pay for companies by taking into consideration their revenues (i.e., smaller revenue companies would have pay predicted based on their revenues rather than by a simple median of pay for all companies in the General Industry Survey).  For each executive position whose compensation is assessed and dropped TW Telecom Inc. which was acquiredset by Level 3 Communications, Inc.the Compensation Committee (or the Board in the case of the Chief Executive Officer), Willis Towers Watson produces a predicted level for each pay component at the 50th percentile of companies based on Cincinnati Bell's revenues.  The use of regression analysis allows the Compensation Committee to compare each executive's pay, both by pay component and in total, to the market 50th percentile of similar revenue-sized companies



To provide additional context for the Compensation Committee in making its decisions, the Compensation Committee reviews "tally sheets" prepared for each of the executives.  Tally sheets provide the Compensation Committee with detailed information, as of a given date, about each executive's current compensation (including the value of any applicable benefit programs) and wealth accumulation, including the value of accrued and vested pay, such as shares of Company stock, vested stock options and other equity awards owned by the executive, the value of any retirement benefits provided by the Company and any pay and benefits triggered under a variety of employment termination scenarios.

Input from the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, Mr. Charles J. Mazza.

Input from Company management (primarily the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer) and the Company's independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson.

Each NEO's individual performance and current/future potential with the Company.

The Compensation Committee considers, as one of the many factors, each component of executive officer compensation compared to the revenue size-adjusted market 50th percentile for two reasons:

Benchmarking target compensation at the 50th percentile is consistent with the practice followed by a majority of companies and is considered "best practice," and

Above-median compensation should be on a delivered actual basis, rather than a target basis, for overachievementover achievement of target performance goals consistent with the Company's pay-for-performance philosophy.

In determining the appropriate compensation levels in a particular year, the Company evaluates the following from boththe general industry survey and the industry peer groups'group data:

Base salary;

Total target cash compensation - the sum of base salary plus target annual incentive bonus opportunity; and

Total target direct compensation - the sum of base salary plus target annual incentive bonus opportunity plus target long-term incentive opportunity.

The Compensation Committee compares each NEO's pay, both by pay component and in total, to the market 50th percentile of similar revenue-sized companies set forth in the peer groups.  The Company does not review pay levels at individual companies or the specific structure of other companies' short- or long-term incentive plans.  Instead, the Compensation Committee considers the predicted pay levels in both peer groups as an indication of market pay practice relating to each pay component and the relevant mixture among pay components.  Thus, the Compensation Committee is able to validate that each NEO's compensation package is market competitive and that an appropriate portion of it is "at risk;" that is, subject to payment only if the Company attains certain quantitative results and the individual achieves certain qualitative results.


28



For 2016,2019, the charts below reflect that each executive has a significant percentage of compensation "at risk" as it reflects the allocation of total target direct compensation among base salary, annual incentive bonuscompensation and long-term incentive compensation.



neopiechart2017.jpg

Based on market practices, combined with the Compensation Committee members' collective experience, the Compensation Committee believes that the foregoing allocation of pay among base salary and short- and long-term incentive compensation provides appropriate motivation to achieve objectives set for the current year while also providing a significant incentive that requires the executives to make decisions that are intended to sustain attainment of business objectives over the longer term.

Role of Compensation Consultants

Both the Compensation Committee and the Company have engaged a consultant to advise on compensation-related matters.  Neither the Compensation Committee nor the Company has identified any conflicts of interest with respect to their respective compensation consultant that would impair the advice provided by such compensation consultant.

The Compensation Committee retains Mr. Charles J. Mazza, an independent compensation consultant, who performs no other services for the Company or its management, to assist in its deliberations regarding executive compensation.  Pursuant to the Committee's instructions, Mr. Mazza analyzes and comments on various compensation proposals made by the Company and on various topics specified by the Committee and opines and reports on these matters in open sessions of Compensation Committee meetings.  In executive sessions of the Compensation Committee meetings, Mr. Mazza addresses subjects of particular interest to the Compensation Committee, such as compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and presents his analysis of such subjects including the pros and cons of certain compensation elements and his recommendations. Pursuant to the Compensation Committee Chair's request, Mr. Mazza contacts each member of the Compensation Committee annually as part of the Compensation Committee's self-evaluation and reports his conclusions to the Compensation Committee.

The Company retains Willis Towers Watson to assist with various compensation-related projects during the course of the year. Typically, the Company has a discussion with Willis Towers Watson about a project, outlining the project's objectives, and discusses Willis Towers Watson's approach to the project before requesting them to complete the project. The projects range from requests for general compensation data or information to requests for specific guidance and recommendations, such as designing specific incentive plans.


Other Compensation Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Compensation Committee recognizes that executive stock ownership is an important means of aligning the interests of the Company's executives with those of its shareholders.  Stock ownership guidelines for the NEOs are as follows:

Chief Executive Officer - 5 times base salary (as adjusted each year)

Other NEOs - 2 times base salary (as adjusted each year)


29




The Compensation Committee has established May 2019 asa timeline of five years from the target date for the NEOsindividual becomes an NEO to reach the new guidelines.  To the extent possible, future long-term incentive awards will be made in shares based on share availability to assist the executives in meeting the guidelines.  Aside from the Company's actual performance from one year to the next, the price of the Company's stock may vary due to the general condition of the economy and the stock market.  Therefore, the Compensation Committee may measure an executive's progress more on the basis of the year-over-year increase in the number of shares owned rather than the overall market value of the shares owned in relation to the executive's ownership goal.  For purposes of measuring ownership, only shares owned outright or beneficially by the executive (including shares owned by the executive's spouse or dependent children and shares owned through the Company's savings plan) are included.  Shares represented by unvested stock options or any other form of equity for which a performance or vesting condition remains to be completed before the executive earns a right to and receives the shares (except for shares that have been electively deferred to a future date) are not counted in determining the executive's level of ownership.

As of March 6, 2017,July 27, 2020, Mr. Torbeck owned shares valued atFox has achieved approximately 121%50% of his ownership target;goal; Mr. Kaiser has achieved approximately 15% of his ownership goal; Mr. Fox has achieved approximately 82%40% of his ownership goal; Mr. Simpson has achieved approximately 24%47% of his ownership goal; Ms. Cornette has achieved approximately 41% of her ownership goal; and Mr. Wilson has achieved approximately 70%118% of his ownership goal; and Mr. Duckworth has achieved approximately 37% of his ownership goal.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

The Company's Insider Trading Policy expressly prohibits ownership of derivative financial instruments or participation in investment strategies that hedge the economic risk of owning the Company's common stock and prohibits officers and directors from pledging Company securities as collateral for loans.

Employment Agreements, Severance and Change in Control Payments and Benefits

The Company generally enters into employment agreements with the NEOs for several reasons.  Employment agreements give the Company flexibility to make changes in key executive positions with or without a showing of cause, if terminating the executive is determined by the Company or the Board to be in the best interests of the Company.  The agreements also minimize the potential for litigation by establishing separation terms in advance and requiring that any dispute be resolved through an arbitration process.  The severance, CIC payments and benefits provided under the employment agreements as described in more detail beginning on page 3644 are important to ensure the retention of the NEOs.

Depending on the circumstances of their termination, the NEOs are eligible to receive severance benefits in the form of a multiple of annual base salary as a lump sum payment, continued access to certain Company-provided healthcare benefits for a defined period post-employment, healthcare benefits and accelerated vesting of all equity as determined by the provisions in their employment agreements, which are discussed in detail starting on page 41.44.  Under a dismissal without cause or constructive discharge following a CIC, the Company provides the severance benefits because it serves the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to have executives focus on the business merits of possible change in control situations without undue concern for their personal financial outcome.  In the case of a termination without cause termination or constructive discharge absent a CIC, the Company believes it is appropriate to provide severance at these levels to ensure the financial security of these executives, particularly in view of the non-compete provisions which state that, for 12 months (24 months in the case of the Chief Executive Officer) following termination, the executive will not compete with the Company or solicit customers or employees of the Company.  Because these potential payments are triggered under very specific circumstances, such payments are not considered in setting pay or other elements of executive compensation.  The Compensation Committee has a policy that the Company will not enter into any new or materially amended employment agreements with NEOs providing for excise tax gross-up provisions with respect to payments contingent upon a CIC, and no NEO has an excise tax gross-up provision.



Adjustments and Recovery of Award Payments and Clawback Policy

The Company is subject to the requirements of Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  Therefore, if the Company was required to restate its financial results due to any material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Securities and Exchange Commission could act to recover from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation received during the 12-month period following the date the applicable financial statements were issued and any profits from any sale of securities of the Company during that 12-month period.


30



In addition, the Board has adopted an interim executive compensation recoupment/clawback policy with the intention that the policy will be modified when final regulations required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") are adopted by the SEC.  The policy allows the Company to recover incentive payments to, or realized by, certain executive officers in the event that the incentive compensation was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently restated to correct any accounting error due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under federal securities laws and such restatement results in a lower payment or award.

Compensation Limitation

Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits to $1,000,000 the available deduction to the Company for compensation paid to any of the Company's NEOs, excluding the Chief Financial Officer, except for performance-based compensation that meets certain requirements. Although therequirements and is paid under a binding agreement that was in effect on or before November 2, 2017.  The Compensation Committee considers the anticipated tax treatmentbelieves that a significant portion of an NEO's compensation should be tied to the Company of its compensation payments, the Compensation Committeeperformance and has determined that it will not necessarily limit executive compensation to amounts deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.



31



Any general statement that incorporates this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall not be deemed to incorporate by reference this Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation and related disclosure. Except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such Report and related disclosure by reference, this information shall not otherwise be deemed to have been filed under such Acts.
Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in thethis proxy statement with management. Based on our review and discussions with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by referenceincluded in Cincinnati Bell Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

2019.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Craig F. Maier, Chairman

Phillip R. Cox
John W. Eck

Lynn A. Wentworth

Meredith J. Ching

Walter A. Dods, Jr.

Martin J. Yudkovitz



32



Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of any person who served as the principal executive officer (Theodore H. Torbeck)(Leigh R. Fox) or principal financial officer (Leigh R. Fox and Andrew(Andrew R. Kaiser) during the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, and the three most highly compensated persons who served as executive officers (Thomas E. Simpson, Christi H. Cornette and Christopher J. Wilson and Joshua T. Duckworth)Wilson) at the end of the year ended December 31, 20162019 (collectively, the “NEOs”).

Summary Compensation Table — Fiscal 20162019

Name,

Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($) (a)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($) (b)

 

 

Option

Awards

($)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($) (c)

 

 

Change in

Pension Value

and

Non-Qualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($) (d)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($) (e)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

2019

 

 

669,538

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

809,025

 

 

 

38,980

 

 

 

14,487

 

 

 

3,992,030

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

2018

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,800,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

650,000

 

 

 

(9,311

)

 

 

18,167

 

 

 

3,108,856

 

 

 

2017

 

 

622,885

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

595,625

 

 

 

15,444

 

 

 

17,933

 

 

 

2,701,887

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

2019

 

 

411,723

 

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

497,490

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,113

 

 

 

1,545,326

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

2018

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,486

 

 

 

1,214,486

 

 

 

2017

 

 

331,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

251,135

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,074

 

 

 

940,363

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

2019

 

 

463,188

 

 

 

 

 

 

633,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

559,676

 

 

 

33,046

 

 

 

11,000

 

 

 

1,699,910

 

Chief Operating Officer

 

2018

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

(7,654

)

 

 

14,524

 

 

 

1,356,870

 

 

 

2017

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

450,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

428,850

 

 

 

13,209

 

 

 

12,563

 

 

 

1,354,622

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

2019

 

 

391,137

 

 

 

 

 

 

240,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

472,616

 

 

 

79,719

 

 

 

11,000

 

 

 

1,194,472

 

Chief Culture Officer

 

2018

 

 

380,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

240,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

380,000

 

 

 

2,723

 

 

 

7,015

 

 

 

1,009,738

 

 

 

2017

 

 

368,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

263,447

 

 

 

40,824

 

 

 

8,705

 

 

 

881,189

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

2019

 

 

378,785

 

 

 

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

457,691

 

 

 

120,209

 

 

 

11,000

 

 

 

1,367,685

 

Vice President and General Counsel

 

2018

 

 

368,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

390,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

368,000

 

 

 

(23,726

)

 

 

10,800

 

 

 

1,113,074

 

 

 

2017

 

 

367,723

 

 

 

 

 

 

390,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

350,705

 

 

 

52,500

 

 

 

12,559

 

 

 

1,173,487

 

Name,
Principal Position
Year 
Salary
($)
 
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards
($) (a)
 
Option
Awards
($)
 
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($) (b)
 
Change in
Pension Value
and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($) (c)
 
All Other
Compensation
($) (d)
 
Total
($)
Theodore H. Torbeck2016 775,913
 
 1,995,000
 
 926,900
 
 10,302
 3,708,115
Chief Executive Officer2015 775,000
 
 1,750,000
 
 951,080
 
 9,805
 3,485,885
2014 750,000
 
 1,650,000
 
 928,800
 
 10,200
 3,339,000
Andrew R. Kaiser (e)2016 249,510
 
 
 
 145,842
 
 6,115
 401,467
Chief Financial Officer                 
Leigh R. Fox (f)2016 422,950
 
 500,000
 
 505,848
 (5,949) 10,600
 1,433,449
Chief Operating Officer2015 385,000
 
 375,000
 
 472,472
 (8,413) 10,400
 1,234,459
2014 350,000
 
 350,000
 
 497,031
 29,072
 10,200
 1,236,303
Thomas E. Simpson (g)2016 397,384
 
 250,000
 
 589,156
 (5,063) 10,600
 1,242,077
Chief Technology Officer2015 370,000
 
 200,000
 
 248,835
 (7,038) 468
 812,265
 2014 241,778
 
 
 
 145,051
 26,870
 7,139
 420,838
Christopher J. Wilson2016 354,804
 
 390,000
 
 822,746
 (14,151) 10,600
 1,563,999
Vice President and General Counsel2015 353,600
 
 320,000
 
 398,578
 (22,106) 10,400
 1,060,472
2014 353,600
 
 
 
 252,456
 95,689
 10,200
 711,945
Joshua T. Duckworth2016 206,402
 
 125,000
 
 141,646
 
 10,555
 483,603
Vice President, Investor Relations and Controller2015 206,000
 
 100,000
 
 121,252
 
 8,165
 435,417
2014 200,000
 
 75,000
 
 109,840
 
 9,636
 394,476

(a)

The 2019 amount reflects the cash payment made to Mr. Kaiser in March 2019.  The payment was made pursuant to the terms of an agreement made with Mr. Kaiser under the Cincinnati Bell 2016 Cash Retention Program in March, 2016.  Mr. Kaiser did not become a NEO until September 2016.

(a)

(b)

The 20162019 amount reflects the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units (50% of award) and the performance stock units (50% of award) issued in 2019 to Messrs. Fox, Kaiser, Simpson and Wilson and Ms. Cornette for the 2019-2021 performance cycle.  The 2018 amount reflects the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units (50% of award) and the performance stock units (50% of award) issued in 2018 to Messrs. Fox, Kaiser, Simpson and Wilson and Ms. Cornette for the 2018-2020 performance cycle. The 2017 amounts reflect the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units (25% of award) and the performance stock units (75% of award) issued in 20162017 to Messrs. Torbeck, Fox, Kaiser, Simpson and Wilson and DuckworthMs. Cornette for the 2016-2018 performance cycle. The 2015 amounts reflect the grant-date fair value of the performance stock units issued in 2015 to Messrs. Torbeck, Fox, Simpson, Wilson and Duckworth for the 2015-2017 performance cycle. The 2014 amounts reflect the grant-date fair value of the performance stock units issued in 2014 to Messrs. Torbeck, Fox and Duckworth for the 2014-20162017-2019 performance cycle.  All amounts assume payout at target.  For further discussion of these awards, see Note 1215 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.  The table below shows the amounts if the maximum payout is earned based on the stock price at date of grant.

 

 

Stock Awards ($)

 

Name

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

 

3,075,000

 

 

 

2,250,000

 

 

 

1,993,750

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

 

687,500

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

481,250

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

 

791,250

 

 

 

562,500

 

 

 

618,750

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

275,000

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

487,500

 

 

 

536,250

 

  Stock Awards ($)
Name 2016 2015 2014
Theodore H. Torbeck 2,743,125
 2,625,000
 2,475,000
Andrew R. Kaiser 
 
 
Leigh R. Fox 687,500
 562,500
 525,000
Thomas E. Simpson 343,750
 300,000
 
Christopher J. Wilson 536,250
 480,000
 
Joshua T. Duckworth 171,875
 150,000
 112,500

33



(c)

(b)

Non-equity incentive plan compensation represents amounts earned for annual performance-based cash incentives and long-term incentive performance plan cash-settled awards. The table below shows the amounts earned for each of these awards:incentives.



Name Year Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive ($) Long-Term Cash-Settled Performance Units ($) (1) Total ($)
Theodore H. Torbeck 2016 926,900
 
 926,900
  2015 951,080
 
 951,080
  2014 928,800
 
 928,800
Andrew R. Kaiser 2016 145,842
 
 145,842
Leigh R. Fox 2016 505,848
 
 505,848
  2015 472,472
 
 472,472
  2014 419,440
 77,591
 497,031
Thomas E. Simpson 2016 385,148
 204,008
 589,156
  2015 248,835
 
 248,835
  2014 145,051
 
 145,051
Christopher J. Wilson 2016 387,546
 435,218
 822,764
  2015 398,578
 
 398,578
  2014 252,456
 
 252,456
Joshua T. Duckworth 2016 141,646
 
 141,646
  2015 121,252
 
 121,252
  2014 109,840
 
 109,840

(d)

(1)The amounts shown above for long-term cash-settled performance units earned by Mr. Fox represent the amounts earned in 2014 and paid in 2015 for the 2012-2014 performance cycle related to cash-payment performance awards granted in January 2012. The amounts shown above for long-term cash-settled performance units earned by Messrs. Simpson and Wilson represent the amounts earned in 2016 and paid in 2017 for the 2014-2016 performance cycle related to cash-payment performance awards granted in January 2014.
(c)

The amounts shown in this column for Messrs. Fox, Simpson and Wilson and Ms. Cornette represent the one-year change in the value of their qualified defined benefit plan and nonqualified excess plan for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, projected forward to age 65 for each executive with interest credited at 4.0%, and then discounted back to the respective year at the discount rate (4.0%(3.1% for 2016, 3.8%2019, 4.2% for 20152018 and 3.4%3.6% for 2014)2017) required under Accounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 960. The present value of the accrued pension benefits decreasedincreased in 20162019 primarily due to an increasea decrease in the applicable discount rate. The Company froze participation in its qualified pension plan for management employees in 2009; therefore, Messrs. Torbeck,Mr. Kaiser and Duckworth areis not entitled to any benefits under this plan. None of the executives receive any preferential treatment or above-market interest under the Company's retirement plans.

(e)

(d)

For each NEO, the amount representsincludes the Company's 401(k) match.match and any miscellaneous grossed up perquisites. Under the terms of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. Retirement Savings Plan, the Company's matching contribution is equal to 100% on the first 3% and 50% on the next 2% of contributions made to the plan by the participant. Eligible compensation generally includes base wages plus any annual incentive paid to eligible participants. For 2016,2019, the maximum Company matching contribution is $10,600.

(e)$11,000.  The 2019 amount for Mr. Fox includes $11,000 of Company matching contributions to his 401(k) and tax gross-up payments of $3,487 for perquisites Mr. Fox received in conjunction with his participation in the Company’s Presidents Club event and the Company’s United Way campaign.  The 2019 amount for Mr. Kaiser was appointed Chief Financial Officer on September 1, 2016.
(f)includes $11,000 of Company matching contributions to his 401(k) and tax gross-up payments of $113 for perquisites Mr. Fox was appointed PresidentKaiser received for his service anniversary and Chief Operating Offer on September 1, 2016.
(g)Mr. Simpson was appointed Chief Technology Officer of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC on July 31, 2014. Mr. Simpson was named Chief Technology Officer ofhis participation in the Company on January 27, 2015.

34




Grants of Plan-Based AwardsCompany’s United Way campaign.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning equity grants to the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 20162019 as well as estimated future payouts under cash incentive plans:

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20162019 Fiscal Year

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards (a)

 

 

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

 

 

All Other

Option Awards:

Number of

Securities

 

 

Exercise

or Base

Price of

 

 

Closing

Price of

Company

Shares

 

 

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

 

Name

 

Grant

Date

 

Threshold

($)

 

 

Target

($)

 

 

Maximum

($)

 

 

Threshold

(#)

 

 

Target

(#)

 

 

Maximum

(#)

 

 

Stock or

Units

(#) (b)

 

 

Underlying

Options

(#)

 

 

Option

Awards

($/Sh)

 

 

on Grant

Date

($/Sh)

 

 

Based

Awards

($) (c)

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,680

 

 

 

147,482

 

 

 

221,223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

1,230,000

 

Restricted stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

147,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

1,230,000

 

Annual cash incentive

 

 

 

 

335,000

 

 

 

670,000

 

 

 

1,005,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,014

 

 

 

32,973

 

 

 

49,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

274,995

 

Restricted stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

275,003

 

Annual cash incentive

 

 

 

 

206,000

 

 

 

412,000

 

 

 

618,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,128

 

 

 

37,949

 

 

 

56,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

316,495

 

Restricted stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

316,503

 

Annual cash incentive

 

 

 

 

231,750

 

 

 

463,500

 

 

 

695,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,115

 

 

 

14,388

 

 

 

21,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

119,996

 

Restricted stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,388

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

119,996

 

Annual cash incentive

 

 

 

 

195,700

 

 

 

391,400

 

 

 

587,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance-based stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,192

 

 

 

23,980

 

 

 

35,970

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

199,993

 

Restricted stock units

 

1/31/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,981

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.34

 

 

 

200,002

 

Annual cash incentive

 

 

 

 

189,520

 

 

 

379,040

 

 

 

568,560

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name 
Grant
Date
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (a)
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (b)
 
All Other
Stock  Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(#) (c)
 
All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 
Closing
Price of
Company
Shares
on Grant
Date
($/Sh)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Based
Awards
($) (d)
Threshold
($)
 
Target
($)
 
Maximum
($)
 
Threshold
(#)
 
Target
(#)
 
Maximum
(#)
 
Theodore H. Torbeck                        
  Performance stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 48,422
 96,845
 145,267
 
 
 
 $15.45
 1,496,250
  Restricted stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 32,281
 
 
 $15.45
 498,750
  Annual cash incentive   387,500
 775,000
 1,162,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Andrew R. Kaiser                        
  Annual cash incentive   70,529
 141,058
 211,587
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leigh R. Fox                        
  Performance stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 12,136
 24,272
 36,408
 
 
 
 $15.45
 375,000
  Restricted stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 8,090
 
 
 $15.45
 125,000
  Annual cash incentive   211,475
 422,950
 634,425
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thomas E. Simpson                        
  Performance stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 6,068
 12,136
 18,204
 
 
 
 $15.45
 187,500
  Restricted stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 4,045
 
 
 $15.45
 62,500
  Annual cash incentive   161,015
 322,030
 483,045
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Christopher J. Wilson                        
  Performance stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 9,466
 18,932
 28,398
 
 
 
 $15.45
 292,500
  Restricted stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 6,310
 
 
 $15.45
 97,500
  Annual cash incentive   176,800
 353,600
 530,400
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Joshua T. Duckworth                        
  Performance stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 3,034
 6,068
 9,102
 
 
 
 $15.45
 93,750
  Restricted stock units 1/28/2016 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,022
 
 
 $15.45
 31,250
  Annual cash incentive   61,800
 123,600
 184,500
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)

The annual cash incentive amounts for Messrs. Kaiser, Fox and Simpson reflect their prorated targets for 2016.
(b)

Amounts reflect shares issuable under performanceperformance-based stock units awarded in 2016.2019.  Performance will be measured based on achievement of the defined targets over the three-year period 2016-2018.2019-2021.  See pages 25 - 2628-29 for further details. For further discussion of assumptions and valuation, refer to Note 12 to15 in our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

(c)

(b)

Restricted stock units were awarded in 20162019 as part of the long-term incentive award.  The restricted stock units vest on the 3rdthird anniversary of the grant date.

(d)

(c)

This amount is equal to the dollar amount of the restricted stock units awarded in 20162019 and the dollar value target number of performanceperformance-based stock units awarded in 20162019 based on the Company's closing stock price on the date of grant of $15.45.


35




Discussion of Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table$8.34 on January 31, 2019.


Discussion of Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements

During 2016,2019, all of the NEOs were employed pursuant to agreements with the Company.  Each employment agreement sets forth, among other things, the NEO's base salary, bonusannual incentive opportunities, entitlement to participate in the Company's benefit and pension plans and to receive equity awards and post-termination benefits and obligations.

Based on the agreements in place at December 31, 2016:

2019:

Mr. Torbeck'sFox's employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Mr. TorbeckFox for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions.  Mr. Torbeck'sFox's employment agreement provides for both a minimum base salary of $750,000$650,000 and a minimum bonusannual incentive target of $750,000$650,000 per year.

Mr. Kaiser’s employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Mr. Kaiser for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions.  Mr. Kaiser’s employment agreement provides for both a minimum base salary of $300,000$400,000 and a minimum bonusannual incentive target of $195,000$400,000 per year.

Mr. Fox's employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Mr. Fox for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions. Mr. Fox's employment agreement provides for both a minimum base salary of $500,000 and a minimum bonus target of $500,000 per year.

Mr. Simpson’s employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Mr. Simpson for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions.  Mr. Simpson’s employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $450,000 and a minimum bonusannual incentive target of $450,000 per year.

Ms. Cornette's employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Ms. Cornette for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions.  Ms. Cornette's employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $380,000 and a minimum annual incentive target of $380,000 per year.

Mr. Wilson's employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Mr. Wilson for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions.  Mr. Wilson's employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $353,600$368,000 per year and a minimum bonusannual incentive target of $353,600$368,000 per year.

Mr. Duckworth's employment agreement provides for the employment and retention of Mr. Duckworth for a one-year term subject to automatic one-year extensions. Mr. Duckworth’s employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $206,000 and a minimum bonus target of $103,000 per year.

Each of the NEOs, except for Messrs. Torbeck,Mr. Kaiser, and Duckworth, has accrued benefits in the Management Pension Plan, which contains both a qualified defined benefit plan and a nonqualified excess benefit provision (the provision for this excess benefit is contained in the qualified defined benefit pension plan document), which applies the same benefit formula to that portion of the base wages and annual bonus payment that exceeds the maximum compensation that can be used in determining benefits under a qualified defined benefit pension plan.

As described below, accruals under the Management Pension Plan are frozen. Except as noted below, prior to the freeze, all eligible salaried employees of the Company participated in the Management Pension Plan on the same basis with benefits being earned after a three-year cliff-vesting period. Covered compensation for purposes of calculating benefits includeincludes base wages including any applicable overtime wages paid plus annual bonus payments.  Upon separationretirement or other termination from employment, the amount of vested benefits to be paid are generally based on the balance credited to the participant's cash balance account under the plan when the benefit begins to be paid but also subject to certain transition or special benefit formula rules in certain situations.  The vested benefits are payable either as a lump-sum, a single life annuity or, for married participants, a 50% joint and survivor annuity, which provides a reduced benefit for the employee in order to provide a benefit equal to 50% of that amount if the employee dies before his/her spouse. A 2009 amendment to the Management Pension Plan generally provided that only "grandfathered participants" and no other participants would accrue additional plan benefits based on their compensation and service after March 8, 2009. For purposes of the plan, a "grandfathered participant" is a Planplan participant who has continuously been an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries since before 2009 and either: (i) was at least age 50 by January 1, 2009; or (ii) had been eligible for and accepted or declined a 2007 early retirement offer of the Company.  Also, the plan was further amended to reduce the benefits accrued by grandfathered participants based on their compensation and service after December 31, 2011 by approximately one-half from the prior accrual rate.  In addition, the Management Pension Plan was amended to stop accruals for grandfathered participants based on compensation paid after June 30, 2013 or services after the pay period ended June 29, 2013.  The Management Pension Plan benefits for the NEO's are shown on pages 39 - 40.

After retirement or other termination of employment, a participant under the Management Pension Plan is entitled to elect to receive a benefit under the plan in the form of a lump sum payment or as an annuity, generally based on the balance credited to the participant's cash balance account under the plan when the benefit begins to be paid (but also subject to certain transition or special benefit formula rules in certain situations).

36




page 43.

Each of the employment agreements also provide for severance payments upon termination of employment as a result of death or disability, termination by the Company without cause or termination upon a CIC. The payments to the NEOs upon termination, orincluding termination following a CIC as of December 31, 20162019 are described beginning on page 41.44.


Long-Term Incentives

In 2016,2019, the NEOs long-term incentive grants for the 2016-20182019-2021 performance period were awarded as a combination of restricted stock units (25%(50%) and performanceperformance-based stock units (75%(50%).  The Compensation Committee decision tobelieves the use performanceof performance-based stock units (i) provides an opportunity (i) for the NEO to be rewarded based on the Company achieving its more objective quantitative operating results that are consistent with its long-term business strategy and (ii) to more closely align such actions with shareholders' interests.  The Compensation Committee addedalso believes that the time-based restricted stock units serve as an incentive to encourage the retention of the NEOs.  The long-term incentives granted to the NEOs are described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that begins on page 19.

22.

Salary and Cash Incentive Awards in Proportion to Total Compensation

In 2016,2019, the percentage of total compensation for each NEO represented by the sum of their salary plus bonusannual incentive and non-equity incentive plan compensation as shown in the summary compensation table on page 3336 was as follows: Mr. TorbeckFox - 46%,37% Mr. Kaiser - 98%, Mr. Fox - 65%59%, Mr. Simpson - 79%60%, Ms. Cornette - 72% , and Mr. Wilson - 75% and Mr. Duckworth - 72%61%.



37




Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning options and other equity awards held by the NEOs at December 31, 2016:2019:

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Option (#)

Exercisable

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Option (#)

Unexercisable

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options (#)

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date (a)

 

 

Number

of

Shares

or

Units of

Stocks

That

Have

Not

Vested

(#) (b)

 

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That

Have Not

Vested

($) (b)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units

or Other

Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

(#) (c)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout Value

of Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

($) (d)

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14.55

 

 

1/29/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

215,857

 

 

 

2,260,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

375,502

 

 

 

3,931,506

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

 

1,001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.05

 

 

10/23/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48,226

 

 

 

504,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,004

 

 

 

879,522

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,734

 

 

 

583,535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98,599

 

 

 

1,032,332

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,428

 

 

 

245,291

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,809

 

 

 

437,740

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

 

19,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.75

 

 

1/31/2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,394

 

 

 

412,455

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

72,088

 

 

 

754,761

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option (#)
Exercisable
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option (#)
Unexercisable
 
Equity
Incentive 
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
 
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 
Option
Expiration
Date (a)
 
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stocks 
That
Have Not
Vested
(#) (b)
 
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stocks 
That
Have Not
Vested
($) (b)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan 
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#) (c)
 
Equity
Incentive
Plan 
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($) (d)
Theodore H. Torbeck23,877
 
 
 23.75
 1/31/2023
        
           32,281
 721,480
 
 
           
 
 454,212
 10,151,638
Andrew R. Kaiser666
 335
 
 17.05
 10/23/2024
        
           
 
 9,708
 216,974
Leigh R. Fox300
 
 
 14.55
 1/29/2020
        
           8,090
 180,812
 
 
           
 
 102,308
 2,286,573
Thomas E. Simpson
 
 
 
 
        
           4,045
 90,406
 
 
           
 
 37,619
 840,773
Christopher J. Wilson19,102
 
 
 23.75
 1/31/2023
        
           6,310
 141,029
 
 
           
 
 59,465
 1,329,032
Joshua T. Duckworth360
 
 
 12.40
 8/23/2020
        
           2,022
 45,192
 
 
           
 
 25,130
 561,644

(a)

(a)

All options granted are for a maximum period of ten years from the date of grant and vest over a three-year period.

(b)

(b)

Amounts in the column include the restricted stock units granted on January 28, 201626, 2017 as part of the 2016-20182017-2019 long-term incentive award, on January 25, 2018 as part of the 2018-2020 long-term incentive award, and on January 31, 2019 as part of the 2019-2021 long-term incentive award; all awards vest three years from the date of grant.  The value is based on the closing price of the Company's common shares as of December 30, 201631, 2019 ($22.35)10.47).

(c)

(c)

Amounts in the column include the performanceperformance-based stock units granted for the 2014-20162017-2019 performance cycle, for the 2015-20172018-2020 performance cycle, and for the 2016-20182019-2021 performance cycle.cycle.  All performanceperformance-based stock units are shown at the maximum level of payout.

(d)

(d)

Assuming the maximum number of stock units is earned, amounts represent the equity incentive plan awards not yet vested. The value is based on the closing price of the Company's common shares as of December 30, 201631, 2019 ($2210.47).35).





38




Option Exercises and Stock Vested


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of options and the vesting of stock held by the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2016:

2019:

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20162019

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise

(#) (a)

 

 

Value Realized

on Exercise

($) (a)

 

 

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting

(#) (b)

 

 

Value Realized on

Vesting

($) (c)

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,901

 

 

 

738,621

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,159

 

 

 

163,966

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,634

 

 

 

210,827

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,948

 

 

 

93,695

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,549

 

 

 

182,711

 

  Option Awards Stock Awards
Name 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#) (a)
 
Value Realized
on Exercise
($) (a)
 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#) (b)
 
Value Realized on
Vesting
($) (c)
Theodore H. Torbeck 
 
 16,214
 268,280
Andrew R. Kaiser 
 
 
 
Leigh R. Fox 
 
 7,094
 109,602
Thomas E. Simpson 
 
 2,427
 37,497
Christopher J. Wilson 
 
 4,354
 67,269
Joshua T. Duckworth 
 
 1,517
 23,438

(a)

(a)

No NEOs exercised stock options or share-settled stock appreciation rights in 2016.2019.

(b)

(b)

The amount shown for Mr. TorbeckFox represents vesting of one-third of the restricted shares granted on January 2, 2013 and shares issued on January 28, 201627, 2020 and March 2, 2020 upon vesting of the restricted stock units and on January 30, 2020 upon vesting of the performance-based stock units under the long-term performance plan awards.awards for the 2017-2019 performance period.  The amounts shown for Ms. Cornette and Messrs. Fox,Kaiser, Simpson Wilson and DuckworthWilson represent shares issued on January 28, 201627, 2020 upon vesting of the restricted stock units and on January 30, 2020 upon vesting of the performance-based stock units under the long-term performance plan awards underfor the 2013-20152017-2019 performance period.

(c)

(c)

The amounts represent the value realized upon vesting based on the closing price of a share of our common stock on the respective vesting dates.date. For Mr. Torbeck, the vesting date of his restricted share award was 10,772 shares on January 4, 2016 ($17.10). For Messrs. Torbeck, Fox, Simpson, Wilson and Duckworth, the vesting date of their long-term performance plan awards under the 2013-20152017-2019 performance period, the closing price on January 27, 2020 was $13.56, the closing price on January 28, 2016 ($15.45).30, 2020 was $13.45 and the closing price on March 2, 2020 was $14.88.

Pension Benefits

In February 2009, the Company made significant changes to the Management Pension Plan.  The Company froze pension benefits for plan participants who were not grandfathered participants (as previously described on page 36)39). Thereafter, the Company amended the Management Pension Plan to stop accruals based upon compensation paid after June 30, 2013 or services after the pay period ended June 29, 2013 for all participants, including grandfathered participants.  Messrs. Fox, Simpson and Wilson are not grandfathered participants and no longer accrue additional benefits under such plan based on current compensation or service.  Ms. Cornette is a grandfathered participant but no longer accrues additional benefits under such plan based on current compensation or service.  In addition, any employee hired on or after January 1, 2009 was not eligible to participate in the Management Pension Plan.  As a result, Messrs. Torbeck,Mr. Kaiser and Duckworth areis not eligible to participate in the Management Pension Plan.



39




The following table sets forth information regarding pension benefits:

Name

 

Plan Name

 

Number of

Years Credited

Service

(#) (a)

 

 

Present Value

of Accumulated

Benefit

($) (b)(c)

 

 

Payments

During

Last

Fiscal

Year ($)

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d)

 

 

9

 

 

 

136,761

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

136,761

 

 

 

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d)

 

 

8

 

 

 

119,131

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

119,131

 

 

 

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d)

 

 

12

 

 

 

530,428

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e)

 

 

12

 

 

 

27,412

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

557,840

 

 

 

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d)

 

 

10

 

 

 

394,074

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e)

 

 

10

 

 

 

158,165

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

552,239

 

 

 

 

Name Plan Name 
Number of
Years Credited
Service
(#) (a)
 
Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit
($) (b)(c)
 
Payments
During
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
Leigh R. Fox Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d) 9
 91,648
 
  Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e) 
 
 
  Total   91,648
  
Thomas E. Simpson Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d) 8
 80,530
 
  Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e) 
 
 
  Total   80,530
  
Christopher J. Wilson Qualified Defined Benefit Plan (d) 10
 283,096
 
  Non-Qualified Excess Plan (e) 10
 120,160
 
  Total   403,256
  

(a)

(a)

This column reflects the years of credited service under the plans rather than actual years of service with the Company, which are higher for each of the NEOs noted. Participants were no longer credited years of service upon the freezing of pension benefits.

(b)

(b)

Amounts in this column represent the accumulated benefit obligations computed using the same assumptions as used for financial reporting purposes, described in more detail in Note 912 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

(c)

(c)

If any of the above-identified executive officers had retired on December 31, 2016,2019, they would have been entitled to a benefit based on the balance then credited to them, without any reduction, under the Management Pension Plan (both the tax-qualified defined benefit plan portion and the non-qualified excess plan portion) as of that date. They may elect a lump-sum or equivalent annuity form of payment subject to any payment restrictions in place due to the funding status.

(d)

(d)

Management Pension Plan.

(e)

(e)

Nonqualified ERISA Excess Provisions of the Management Pension Plan.

A participant's account under the Management Pension Plan is also generally credited with assumed interest for each calendar year at a certain interest rate.  Such interest rate for 20162019 was 4.0% per annum.


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning compensation deferred by the NEOs:
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2016 Fiscal Year
Name 
Executive
Contributions
($)
 
Company
Contributions
($)
 
Aggregate
Earnings
($) (a)
 
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($) (b)
 
Aggregate Balance
at  December 31, 2016
($)
Theodore H. Torbeck 
 
 
 
 
Andrew R. Kaiser 
 
 
 
 
Leigh R. Fox 
 
 
 
 
Thomas E. Simpson 
 
 
 
 
Christopher J. Wilson 
 
 3,060
 464,940
 
Joshua T. Duckworth 
 
 
 
 
(a)For Mr. Wilson, the amount shown includes the difference between the closing price of the Company's stock ($18.00) on December 31, 2015 and the closing price of the Company's stock on November 7, 2016 ($17.90) with respect to deferrals made prior to 2016.
(b)For Mr. Wilson, the amount shown includes the value of his account balance that was distributed on November 7, 2016 in conjunction with the termination of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as approved by the Board on October 20, 2015.



40




Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control
Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control

The following table shows potential payments to ourthe NEOs directly and indirectly on their behalf under existing contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, for various scenarios involving a CIC or termination of employment, assuming a December 31,2016 2019 termination or CIC date and, where applicable, using the closing price of our common shares on December 30, 201631, 2019 of $22.35.


$10.47.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change in Control: 20162019

Name

 

Executive Payment on Termination

 

Involuntary

Not for

Cause

Termination

($)

 

 

Change in

Control

($)

 

 

Death

($)

 

 

Disability

($)

 

Leigh R. Fox

 

Base Salary

 

 

1,340,000

 

 

 

2,003,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Target Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

2,003,300

 

 

 

670,000

 

 

 

670,000

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based

Stock Units (a)

 

 

1,076,871

 

 

 

2,621,007

 

 

 

2,621,007

 

 

 

2,621,007

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units

 

 

715,886

 

 

 

2,260,023

 

 

 

991,094

 

 

 

991,094

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Benefits (b)

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

Total

 

 

3,163,943

 

 

 

8,918,816

 

 

 

4,282,101

 

 

 

4,313,287

 

Andrew R. Kaiser

 

Base Salary

 

 

824,000

 

 

 

1,030,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Target Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

1,030,000

 

 

 

412,000

 

 

 

412,000

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based

Stock Units (a)

 

 

241,124

 

 

 

586,351

 

 

 

586,351

 

 

 

586,351

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units

 

 

159,688

 

 

 

504,926

 

 

 

181,185

 

 

 

181,185

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Benefits (b)

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,255,998

 

 

 

3,182,463

 

 

 

1,179,536

 

 

 

1,210,722

 

Thomas E. Simpson

 

Base Salary

 

 

927,000

 

 

 

1,158,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Target Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

1,158,750

 

 

 

463,500

 

 

 

463,500

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based

Stock Units (a)

 

 

290,898

 

 

 

688,225

 

 

 

688,225

 

 

 

688,225

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units

 

 

186,198

 

 

 

583,535

 

 

 

212,943

 

 

 

212,943

 

 

 

Basic Benefits (b)

 

 

29,995

 

 

 

29,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,995

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,434,091

 

 

 

3,619,255

 

 

 

1,364,668

 

 

 

1,394,663

 

Christi H. Cornette

 

Base Salary

 

 

782,800

 

 

 

978,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Target Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

978,500

 

 

 

391,400

 

 

 

391,400

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based

Stock Units (a)

 

 

141,188

 

 

 

291,830

 

 

 

291,830

 

 

 

291,830

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units

 

 

94,649

 

 

 

245,291

 

 

 

90,356

 

 

 

90,356

 

 

 

Basic Benefits (b)

 

 

9,742

 

 

 

9,742

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,742

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,028,379

 

 

 

2,503,863

 

 

 

773,586

 

 

 

783,328

 

Christopher J. Wilson

 

Base Salary

 

 

758,080

 

 

 

947,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Target Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

947,600

 

 

 

379,040

 

 

 

379,040

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based

Stock Units (a)

 

 

252,107

 

 

 

503,178

 

 

 

503,178

 

 

 

503,178

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units

 

 

161,374

 

 

 

412,455

 

 

 

156,123

 

 

 

156,123

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentives — Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Benefits (b)

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,186

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,202,747

 

 

 

2,842,019

 

 

 

1,038,341

 

 

 

1,069,527

 


Name Executive Payment on Termination 
Involuntary
Not for
Cause
Termination
($)
 
Change in
Control
($)
 
Death
($)
 
Disability
($)
Theodore H. Torbeck Base Salary 1,550,000
 2,317,250
 
 
  Annual Incentive Target Opportunity 
 2,317,250
 926,900
 926,900
  Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based Units (a) 4,603,295
 6,767,759
 6,767,759
 6,767,759
  Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units 
 721,480
 222,500
 222,500
  Basic Benefits (b) 23,369
 23,369
 
 23,369
  Total 6,176,664
 12,147,108
 7,917,159
 7,940,528
Andrew R. Kaiser Base Salary 600,000
 750,000
 
 
  Annual Incentive Target Opportunity 
 487,500
 145,842
 145,842
  Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based Units (a) 144,649
 144,649
 144,649
 144,649
  Long Term Incentives - Options 1,776
 1,776
 1,776
 1,776
  Basic Benefits 30,111
 30,111
 
 30,111
  Total 776,536
 1,414,036
 292,267
 322,378
Leigh R. Fox Base Salary 1,000,000
 1,250,000
 
 
  Annual Incentive Target Opportunity 
 1,250,000
 505,848
 505,848
  Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based Units (a) 981,925
 1,524,382
 1,524,382
 1,524,382
  Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units 
 180,812
 55,761
 55,761
  Basic Benefits (b) 31,475
 31,475
 
 31,475
  Total 2,013,400
 4,236,669
 2,085,991
 2,117,466
Thomas E. Simpson Base Salary 900,000
 1,125,000
 
 
  Annual Incentive Target Opportunity 
 1,125,000
 385,148
 385,148
  Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based Units (a) 477,642
 748,859
 748,859
 748,859
  Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units 
 90,406
 27,881
 27,881
  Basic Benefits (b) 29,704
 29,704
 
 29,704
  Total 1,407,346
 3,118,969
 1,161,888
 1,191,592
Christopher J. Wilson Base Salary 707,200
 884,000
 
 
  Annual Incentive Target Opportunity 
 884,000
 387,546
 387,546
  Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based Units (a) 864,677
 1,287,807
 1,287,807
 1,287,807
  Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units 
 141,029
 43,492
 43,492
  Basic Benefits (b) 31,010
 31,010
 
 31,010
  Total 1,602,887
 3,227,846
 1,718,845
 1,749,855
Joshua T. Duckworth Base Salary 412,000
 515,000
 
 
  Annual Incentive Target Opportunity 
 309,000
 141,646
 141,646
  Long-Term Incentives — Performance-Based Units (a) 238,810
 374,430
 374,430
 374,430
  Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units 
 45,192
 13,937
 13,937
  Basic Benefits (b) 30,113
 30,113
 
 30,113
  Total 680,923
 1,273,735
 530,013
 560,126

(a)

(a)

Performance-based stock units include shares and cash awards that are based on the attainment of target performance metrics in the 20172019 performance year. These awards have been included in the table at target; however, the actual payouts based on attainment of the metrics could range from zero to 150% of the target amount.

(b)

(b)

Basic benefits consist of medical, dental and vision and group term life insurancecoverage similar to such benefits provided by the Company to other employees.  In June 2014, the Company changed the benefits under the long-term disability plan to include continuation of benefits for up to 24 months after the date of disability.


41




If any of the executives elects to voluntarily terminate employment with the Company, or if they are terminated by the Company for cause, they are entitled to no payments from the Company other than those benefits which they have a non-forfeitable vested right to receive (the “vested amounts”), which include any shares of stock they own outright, vested options which may be exercisable for a period of 90 days following termination and vested amounts under the Company's long-term incentive, pension and savings plans.

In addition to any applicable “vested amounts,” an executive will be entitled to receive certain additional benefits if one of the four termination scenarios detailed in the above table and discussed below occurs.  Regardless of the termination scenario, Messrs. Torbeck,Fox, Kaiser, Fox, Simpson and Wilson and DuckworthMs. Cornette will continue to be bound by the non-disclosure, non-compete and non-solicitation provisions of their employment agreements.

If an executive is terminated by the Company without cause (an involuntary not for cause termination), the executive will be entitled to the following:

A lump-sum cash payment equal to 2.0 times the executive's base salary;

Continued

Access to medical, dental vision and life insurancevision benefits during the two-year period following the executive's termination of employment on the samean after-tax basis as any active salaried employee provided any required monthly contributions are made;

Continued treatment as an active employee during the two-year period following termination with respect to any outstanding long-term incentive cycles in which the executive may be participating, in and any unvested stock options will continue to vest under the normal vesting schedule as though the executive was still an active employee;employee (provided, with respect to awards granted under the 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, that the executive's termination is at least one year after the grant date of the award); and

The ability to exercise any vested options for an additional 90 days after the end of the two-year period.

If an executive is terminated within the one-year period following a CIC, the executive will be entitled to the following:

A lump-sum cash payment equal to 2.5 times the sum of his or her base salary and annual bonusincentive target in the case of Messrs. Kaiser,  Fox, Simpson and Wilson and DuckworthMs. Cornette and 2.99 times in the case of Mr. Torbeck;Fox;

Continued

Access to medical, dental and vision and life insurance coveragebenefits during the two-year period following the executive's termination of employment on the samean after-tax basis as other active employees provided any required monthly contributions are made;

Full vesting of any options restricted shares and/or other equity awardsgranted under the 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan and the ability to exercise such options for the two-year period following termination; and

Full vesting and payout at target amounts of any other awards granted under long-term incentive plans (in the event an executive is terminated within the two-year period following a CIC).     that are continued after a CIC. Awards that constitute deferred compensation under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A shall not be continued in the event of a CIC and will become vested and pay out at target upon a CIC.  The types of outstanding awards that are deferred compensation are restricted stock units and performance-based stock units.

If an executive is “terminated” because of his or her death, the executive's beneficiary will be entitled to the following:

A payment equal to the prorated bonusincentive and payable to the deceased executive for the current year;

Full vesting of all options held by the deceased executive and the ability to exercise such options for the one-year period following the date of the executive's death;

Full vesting and payout at target amounts of any outstanding performance-based awards granted to the deceased executive under long-term incentive plans; and

Prorated vesting and payout from the date of grant through the date of death of any outstanding time-based awards granted to the deceased executive under long-term incentive plans.

If an executive is terminated by reason of disability, the executive will be entitled to the following:


A payment equal to the prorated bonus

A payment equal to the prorated incentive and payable to the disabled executive for the current year;

Full vesting of all options held by the disabled executive and the ability to exercise such options for the one-year period following the date of the executive's disabling condition;

Continued participation by the disabled executive in any outstanding performance-based awards granted under  long-term incentive plans;

Prorated vesting and payout from the date of grant through the date of disability of any time-based awards granted to the disabled executive under long-term incentive plans; and

Continued consideration of the disabled executive as an employee for all other benefits so long as the disabling condition that resulted in the disability-based termination is present for up to 24 months after the date of disability.


42




Receipt of the above-described payments (other than the “vested amounts”) is conditioned upon the executive executing a release of claims in favor of the Company.

Under all of the termination scenarios in the preceding table, as of December 31, 2016,2019, Messrs. Fox, Kaiser, Fox, Simpson, and Wilson and DuckworthMs. Cornette had certain "vested amounts" to which they were entitled as follows: Mr. Fox - $75,127, Mr. Kaiser - $3,530, Mr. Fox - $69,128,$3,932, Mr. Simpson - $58,686,$66,014, Ms. Cornette - $598,947 and Mr. Wilson - $329,087 and Mr. Duckworth - $3,582.

$372,314.



43




Item 2 - Recommendation of the Frequency of Advisory Vote Regarding Company's Executive Officers' Compensation
CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 14Athe SEC, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the annual total compensation ("ATC") of our employees and the ATC of Mr. Fox, our President and Chief Executive Officer (the "PEO").

For 2019, our last completed fiscal year,

The ATC of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is offering shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to recommend the frequency of the named executive officers' compensation advisory vote (described in Item 3). Rule 14a-21 of the Exchange Act provides that shareholders may elect to hold the advisory vote on named executive officers' compensation every 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years. Based on the vote of the shareholders at the 2011 annual meeting, shareholders currently cast this advisory vote every year. The Board places a high value on regular feedback from our shareholders on important issues such as named executive officers' compensation. Therefore, the Board recommends that shareholders vote to recommend an advisory vote on named executive officers' compensation "1 year."

Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for shareholder vote:
RESOLVED, that the option set forth below that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholdersmedian employee of the Company shall bewas $77,653; and

The ATC for our PEO was $ 3,992,030

Based on this information, for 2019 the preferred and recommended frequency with whichresulting pay ratio between the Company should to hold an advisory vote on the approvalATC of the compensation of its named executive officers:

1 YEAR or
2 YEARS or
3 YEARS.”
However, as this is an advisory vote,PEO to the result will not be binding on our Board of Directors or the Company. Our Board and Compensation Committee will consider the outcomeATC of the vote when determining how oftenmedian employee was 51:1.

To identify the Company should submit to shareholders a vote formedian employee, we took the advisory approvalfollowing steps:

1.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately 4,400 employees.  

2.

In determining the employee population, we used all full-time, part-time and temporary employees (except for our PEO and those employees on leaves of absence).

3.

The median employee was identified from our employee population by comparing our payroll records for such employees as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 and to the Canada Revenue Agency on Form T4 for 2019.  We used a December 31, 2019 conversion rate of 0.77 CAD to 1 USD for our Canadian-based employees.  In addition, since the Company does not widely distribute equity awards to our employees, such awards were excluded from our compensation measure.

4.

We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in this calculation.  Since the majority of our employees and our PEO are based in the U.S., we did not make any cost of living adjustments in identifying the median employee.

5.

Once we identified the median employee, we determined the ATC for the median employee in the same manner used to determine Mr. Fox's ATC as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 36, resulting in an ATC of $77,653.


Item 2 - Advisory Approval of the named executive officers' compensation included in the Company’s proxy statement.Company's Executive Officers' CompensationOur Board and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote for a particular frequency, we will consider our shareholders’ recommendation when making a determination concerning the frequency of an advisory vote on the named executive officers' compensation.

Vote Required
The option of 1 YEAR, 2 YEARS or 3 YEARS that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders will be recommendation of the shareholders regarding the frequency for the advisory vote on named executive officers' compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast “FOR” or ‘AGAINST” any frequency choice and will have no direct effect on the outcome of this proposal. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted for the option of “1 YEAR.”
Our Recommendation
The Board recommends that shareholders vote for the option of “1 YEAR” as the frequency with which shareholders are provided an advisory vote on the named executive officers' compensation included in the Company’s proxy statement.


44



Item 3 - Advisory Approval of the Company's Executive Officers' Compensation

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act and pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is submitting to its shareholders a vote for the advisory approval of the Company’s executive officers' compensation (“say-on-pay vote”).  The Board of Directors determined that it would submit a say-on-pay vote to our shareholders annually.  This year’s say-on-pay vote addresses our executive officers' compensation as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section (“CD&A”) beginning on page 1922 and the Executive Compensation section beginning on page 33.

36.

The guiding principles of the Company’s compensation policies and decisions include aligning each executive’s compensation with the Company’s business strategy and providing incentives needed to attract, motivate and retain key executives who are important to our long-term success.  Consistent with this philosophy, a significant portion of the total compensation for each of our executives is directly related to the Company’s revenues, earnings and other performance factors that measure our progress against the goals of our strategic plan as well as performance compared to our peer companies.  The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that our compensation design and practices are effective in implementing our strategic goals.  For the above reasons, we ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

The say-on-pay vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board.   However, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders, and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will seek to determine the causes of any significant negative voting results in an effort to better understand shareholder issues and concerns with our executive officers' compensation.

Vote Required

Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common shares and 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, voting as one class, present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers are prohibited from giving proxies to vote on executive compensation matters unless the beneficial owner of such shares has given voting instructions on the matter. This means that, if your broker is the recordholder of your shares, you must give voting instructions to your broker with respect to this Item 32 if you want your broker to vote your shares on this matter. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted for the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes are not considered shares entitled to vote on this proposal and will have no impact on the outcome of this proposal.

Our Recommendation

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation of its named executive officers as disclosed in the CD&A and Executive Compensation sections of this proxy statement.



45



Item 4 - Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "2017 LTIP"), a long-term incentive compensation plan for employees of the Company and its subsidiaries (with the Company and its subsidiaries collectively referred to as the “Employer”). The proposed 2017 LTIP is intended to replace the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, which expires in May 2017. After the expiration of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, no awards will be granted under that plan, although outstanding awards under that plan will remain outstanding. THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED 2017 LTIP IS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX I OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH TEXT.
The purposes of the 2017 LTIP are to (i) further the long-term growth of the Company by offering competitive incentive compensation related to long-term performance goals to those employees of the Employer and its subsidiaries who will be responsible for planning and directing such growth, (ii) reinforce a commonality of interest between Company shareholders and the Employer’s employees who participate in the plan, and (iii) aid the Employer in attracting and retaining employees of outstanding abilities and specialized skills. If approved by the Company’s shareholders, the plan will be effective as of May 4, 2017. No awards will be made under the 2017 LTIP unless it is approved by the shareholders. If the 2017 LTIP is not approved by the shareholders, the Company will lose the ability to issue any equity-based long-term incentive awards which would eliminate a key element of the Company's compensation program that is important in attracting and retaining high-quality employees and aligning the interests of the Company's executives and shareholders.
The principal provisions of the 2017 LTIP are as follows.
1. Administration. The 2017 LTIP will be administered by a committee (for purposes of this discussion as to the plan, the “Committee”). Ministerial functions may be performed by an administrative committee comprised of Company employees appointed by the Committee. Unless changed by the Board, the Committee will be the Compensation Committee. Subject to the limits and terms of the plan, the Committee has the authority to (i) determine the employees to whom awards will be made under the plan, (ii) determine the type, size and terms and conditions of the awards, (iii) determine the time when the awards will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability, (iv) amend the terms and conditions of any previously issued award and (v) deal with any other matters arising under the plan.
The Committee may delegate to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer its right to make awards under the 2017 LTIP to employees who (i) are not otherwise subject to the stock reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) are not expected to become employees whose compensation is deductible by the Employer only up to certain limits under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Thus, the Chief Executive Officer generally can grant awards under the 2017 LTIP to employees of the Employer who are not officers of the Company, if delegated this right by the Compensation Committee. If the Chief Executive Officer is delegated such right, then any reference to the Committee in the following parts of this discussion of the plan should be deemed to be a reference to the Chief Executive Officer to the extent that the discussion may apply to any awards that he or she grants under the plan.
2. Employees Eligible to Receive Awards. Any person who is employed and classified as an employee by the Employer is eligible to be granted an award under the 2017 LTIP. Because the 2017 LTIP provides broad discretion in selecting the types of awards and the employees to whom awards will be granted, the number of employees who will participate in the plan and the benefits to be awarded to them cannot be determined at this time. As of December 31, 2016, there were approximately 3,400 employees of the Employer.
3. Types of Awards. Under the terms of the 2017 LTIP, the Committee may grant awards at any time. The grants may consist of one or a combination of the following forms of awards: (i) stock options, including incentive stock options (“ISOs”) and options that are not ISOs; (ii) stock units, including restricted stock units and performance stock units; (iii) stock awards, including time-based and performance-based restricted stock; (iv) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”); (v) other stock-based awards; and (vi) nonstock-based awards. No award may be granted under the plan after May 3, 2027.

46




(a) Stock Options. A stock option represents an option to purchase, over a certain time period not to exceed ten years, a number of common shares at a fixed purchase price. The fixed purchase price of any common share acquired under any stock option granted under the plan may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a common share on the grant date of the option.
Stock options can either be ISOs or options that are not ISOs (also known as “nonqualified stock options”). ISOs are special types of stock options that are intended to qualify as such under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and can provide special tax advantages for employees that are not available with nonqualified stock options. The aggregate fair market value of common shares, determined at grant date, for which ISOs can be exercisable for the first time during any calendar year as to any employee is limited by law (the current limitation is $100,000). In addition, the Committee cannot grant an ISO to any employee who owns (directly or constructively) more than 10% of the voting power of the Company’s shares, unless the exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of a common share on the date of the grant of the option.
(b) Stock Units. A stock unit represents the right to receive a common share or a dollar amount based on the value of a common share at a future date. The Committee may grant stock units that are payable on terms and conditions determined by the Committee, which may include payment based on achievement of performance goals (a type of award commonly referred to as “performance stock units”) or after a specified additional period of employment for vesting (a type of award commonly referred to as “restricted stock units”). The grantee will have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends with respect to stock units unless and until common shares are issued in settlement of such award. The Committee may grant dividend equivalents in connection with stock units, which are rights to receive additional stock units or cash amounts on stock units that vest based on the value of any cash dividends the Company declares prior to the settlement of the vested stock units (and are subject to such other terms and conditions determined by the Committee), provided that no dividend equivalent may be paid before the stock unit to which it relates vests. Any amount that becomes payable under a stock unit can be paid in cash, in common shares or other property, or by a combination thereof, as the Committee may determine.
(c) Stock Awards. A stock award constitutes common shares that either (i) have no restrictions or (ii) may not be disposed of by the employee to whom they are awarded until certain restrictions lapse (and that will ultimately be forfeited to the extent such restrictions are not satisfied). The Committee may establish conditions under which restrictions on stock awards will lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Committee deems appropriate, including restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals. The Committee will determine to what extent, and under what conditions, an employee will have the right to vote shares of stock awards and to receive any dividends or other distributions paid on such common shares during the restriction period. Any dividends on stock awards will be withheld while the stock awards are subject to restrictions, and the dividends will be payable only upon the lapse of the restrictions on the stock awards and subject to such other additional terms and conditions as the Committee determines.
(d) Stock Appreciation Rights ("SAR"). A SAR represents the right, upon exercise of the SAR, to receive payment of a sum not to exceed the amount, if any, by which the fair market value (as determined on the date of the exercise of the SAR) of a number of common shares on which the SAR is based exceeds a fixed grant price of the SAR. The plan provides that the grant price of the common shares that are subject to a SAR may not be less than the fair market value of such common shares as determined on the SAR’s grant date. A SAR may be granted by itself, in conjunction with new stock options granted at the same time under the plan, or in relation to non-ISO stock options that were previously granted. If, on the date on which a SAR would otherwise terminate or expire, the SAR by its terms remains exercisable and would, if exercised, result in payment to its holder, then, immediately prior to such termination or expiration, it will be deemed exercised.
(e) Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant other awards not specified in paragraphs (a) through (d) above that are based on or measured by common shares, on such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. Other stock-based awards may be granted subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions and may be payable in common shares or cash, or by a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee in the employee’s award agreement.
(f) Nonstock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant nonstock-based awards that grant an employee a right to receive an amount that is equal to a dollar value, or not more than a maximum dollar value, or a percentage of the employee’s compensation, if and when certain conditions are met, such as the achievement of performance goals or continued employment conditions, as determined by the Committee in the employee’s award agreement.

47




(g)Minimum Vesting. Other than in the event of the employee’s death or disability or a change in control of the Company, all awards must generally have a minimum vesting period of one year from the date of grant. However, awards with respect to up to 5% of the aggregate common shares authorized for grant under the 2017 LTIP may have a vesting period of less than one year (for example, vesting upon a specified retirement date).
4. Common Shares Available for Issuance and Other Award Limits. Subject to adjustment in the case of certain changes in the capital structure of the Company, the following limits apply to the number of common shares that may be issued or transferred under or with respect to awards granted under the 2017 LTIP:
(a) The maximum number of common shares which may be issued or transferred under or with respect to all of the awards (considered in the aggregate) granted under the plan during the plan’s entire existence shall be equal to 2,700,000 common shares.
(b) The maximum number of common shares which may be issued or transferred under or with respect to all ISOs (considered in the aggregate but separately from all other types of stock options and other forms of awards) granted under the plan during the plan’s entire existence shall be equal to 2,000,000 common shares.
(c) The maximum aggregate number of common shares with respect to which all awards may be made under the plan to any employee in a calendar year shall be 2,000,000 shares, which may consist of up to 2,000,000 shares via options and SARs and up to 2,000,000 shares via stock awards, stock units, or other stock-based awards or a combination thereof. Such individual employee limits shall apply without regard to whether the awards are to be paid in common shares or cash.
All cash payments (other than with respect to dividend equivalents) shall equal the fair market value of the common shares to which the cash payments relate. The maximum dollar value of all nonstock-based awards granted under the plan to any employee in any calendar year shall be $5,000,000. The maximum dollar value of any nonstock-based award granted to an employee shall be deemed to be the maximum dollar amount of cash (or other property) that ultimately could, in the event any and all performance goals and other criteria or conditions applicable to the award are met, be paid to the employee under the award, regardless of (i) whether or not the actual payment under such award ends up being a lesser dollar amount at the time of payment, or (ii) whether or not the award or portion thereof is forfeited, expires, or in any other manner terminates without the payment of any compensation.
5. Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The Committee may determine that awards granted to an employee are to be considered exempt from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The 2017 LTIP also allows the Committee to grant awards that are not intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation; such awards may or may not have performance criteria similar to awards that are intended to be exempt awards. Options and SARs will be deemed to be exempt from Section 162(m) as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, provided they are awarded by the Committee itself and not its delegate.
When awards of Qualified Performance-Based Compensation are made, the Committee will establish in writing (i) the objective performance criteria that must be met, (ii) the period during which performance will be measured, (iii) the maximum amounts that may be paid if the performance criteria are met, and (iv) any other conditions that the Committee deems appropriate and consistent with the requirements of Section 162(m) for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The performance criteria shall satisfy the requirements for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, including the requirement that the achievement of the goals be substantially uncertain at the time they are established and that the performance goals be established in such a way that a third party with knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether and to what extent the performance goals have been met. The Committee may not later increase the amount of compensation that is payable under the award, but may reduce the amount of compensation that is payable.

48



The Committee will use objectively determinable performance goals based on one or more of the following criteria for the Company or any subsidiary, business unit, division, department or any combination of these and they may be applied on an absolute basis and/or relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, or any combination thereof, as the Committee shall determine (together, the “Performance Criteria”): (i) earnings or earnings per share (whether on a pre-tax, after-tax, operational or other basis, diluted or undiluted, and before or after adjustments for extraordinary items and business combinations or acquisitions and restructuring costs or interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization); (ii) return on equity; (iii) return on invested capital; (iv) return on sales; (v) net or gross profit; (vi) net or gross revenues or revenue growth over prior year or as compared to budget; (vii) expenses or expense levels; (viii) one or more operating ratios; (ix) stock price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return); (x) shareholder return; (xi) the accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, public offerings or similar extraordinary business transactions; (xii) economic value added; (xiii) net or gross income or income growth over prior year or as compared to budget, which, if determined for a subsidiary, department or business unit, may be determined solely with reference to direct costs of that subsidiary, department or business unit; (xiv) free cash flow (defined as cash generated by operating activities, minus capital expenditures and other investing activities, restructuring and severance-related payments, dividend payments and proceeds from the issuance of equity securities, and proceeds from the sale of assets); and (xv) corporate performance indicators (indices based on the level of certain services provided to customers).
Performance goals may also be based on the achievement of specified levels of Company performance (or performance of an applicable affiliate, subsidiary, division or business unit of the Company) under one or more of the Performance Criteria described above relative to the Company’s past performance or performance of other corporations. Such performance goals shall be set by the Committee over a specified performance period that shall not be shorter than one year and otherwise within the time period prescribed by, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of, Section 162(m). The Committee may also provide that, in determining whether any Performance Criteria has been attained, certain special or technical factors will be ignored or, conversely, taken into account, in whole or in part, including but not limited to any one or more of the following factors: (i) a gain, loss, income, or expense resulting from changes in generally accepted accounting principles that become effective during the applicable performance period or any previous period; (ii) a gain, loss, income, or expense that is extraordinary in nature; (iii) an impact of other specified nonrecurring events; (iv) a gain or loss resulting from, and the direct expense incurred in connection with, the disposition of a business, in whole or in part, the sale of investments or non-core assets, or discontinued operations, categories, or segments of businesses; (v) a gain or loss from claims and/or litigation and insurance recoveries relating to claims or litigation; (vi) an impact of impairment of tangible or intangible assets; (vii) an impact of restructuring activities, including, without limitation, reductions in force; (viii) an impact of investments or acquisitions made during the applicable performance period or any prior period; (ix) a loss from political and legal changes that impact operations, as a consequence of war, insurrection, riot, terrorism, confiscation, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, seizure, business interruption, or regulatory requirements; (x) retained and uninsured losses from natural catastrophes; (xi) currency fluctuations; (xii) an expense relating to the issuance of stock options and/or other stock-based compensation; (xiii) an expense relating to the early retirement of debt; and/or (xiv) an impact of the conversion of convertible debt securities.
6. Adjustments. The 2017 LTIP provides for appropriate adjustments in the number of common shares subject to awards and available for future awards, as well as the maximum award limitations under the plan, in the event of changes in the common shares outstanding by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split or combination, reclassification, merger, consolidation or similar change in the capital structure of the Company.
7. Change in Control. In the event a change in control of the Company (as is defined in the terms of the 2017 LTIP) occurs, the Company may continue, assume, or provide substitution for outstanding awards in accordance with the terms of the plan.
If and to the extent that awards granted under the 2017 LTIP are not continued, assumed, or substituted in the event of a change in control of the Company, then, in general terms, upon the date of the change in control each such outstanding award will become fully vested, and, if applicable, exercisable, and any restrictions applicable to such award will lapse, with any applicable performance goals deemed to be achieved at 100%, (but not more than 100%) of the “target” level for the performance goal.
Further, in the event a change in control of the Company occurs and awards granted under the 2017 LTIP are continued, assumed, or substituted, and the employee to whom the awards are granted experiences an involuntary termination of employment within 24 months following the change in control, then, in general terms upon the date of the employee’s termination of employment, each then-outstanding replacement award will become fully vested and, if applicable, exercisable, and any restrictions applicable to such award will lapse, with any applicable performance goals deemed to be achieved at 100% (but not more than 100%) of the “target” level for the performance goal.

49



8. Amendment and Termination. The 2017 LTIP may generally be amended or terminated by the Board at any time, provided, however, that the Board may not amend the plan without approval of the shareholders of the Company if shareholder approval is required in order to comply with applicable laws or to comply with applicable stock exchange requirements. No amendment or termination will impair the rights of an employee with respect to a previously granted award without the employee’s consent, unless such right has been reserved in the plan or the award agreement.
The terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding options or SARs or to cancel outstanding options or SARs in exchange for cash, other awards of options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original options or SARs, without the approval of the Company’s shareholders.
9. Deferrals. The 2017 LTIP provides the Committee with discretion to provide for the deferral of an award or permit participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of awards in a manner consistent with applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
10. Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following describes, in very general terms, the federal income tax consequences arising with respect to awards granted under the 2017 LTIP. Tax consequences may vary depending on particular circumstances, and administrative and judicial interpretations of the application of the federal income tax laws are subject to change.
A stock option or SAR that is granted to an employee will generally create no tax consequences for the employee or the Employer at the time of the grant of the award. Further, the employee will have no taxable income upon exercising an ISO (except that the alternative minimum tax may apply), and the Employer will receive no deduction when an ISO is exercised. Upon exercising a nonqualified stock option or a SAR, however, the employee generally must recognize ordinary compensation income equal to the amount by which the fair market value of the common shares that are subject to the portion of the option or SAR being exercised, as determined on the date of exercise, exceeds the purchase or grant price of such common shares, and the Employer will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.
The treatment to an employee of a disposition of common shares acquired through the exercise of a stock option or a SAR depends on how long the common shares have been held and on whether such common shares were acquired by exercising an ISO or by exercising a nonqualified stock option or a SAR. Generally, there will be no tax consequence to the Employer in connection with a disposition of common shares acquired under a stock option except that the Employer may be entitled to a deduction in the case of a disposition of common shares acquired under an ISO before certain holding periods have been satisfied.
With respect to stock units, stock awards, other stock-based awards and nonstock-based awards granted under the 2017 LTIP, the employee generally must recognize ordinary compensation income equal to the fair market value of the common shares or other property or benefits provided under the award at the first time such common shares or other property or benefits are not subject to a substantial risk that they will be forfeited or not become payable; and the Employer will be entitled then to a deduction for the same amount.
In certain cases, such as an award to an employee of restricted stock, the employee may have the right under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to elect to recognize as ordinary compensation income the value of the award when issued instead of when no further substantial risk of forfeiture exists with respect to the award. In the event of such an election, the Employer will be entitled to a deduction for such value at the same time.
With respect to a non-restricted stock award granted under the 2017 LTIP to an employee, the employee generally must recognize ordinary compensation income equal to the fair market value of the common shares received under the award at the time it is received, and the Employer will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.
The foregoing tax rules may be slightly adjusted for an award granted to an employee who is subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
11. Miscellaneous. The 2017 LTIP generally requires that any purchase price or tax withholding obligations that apply to an employee with respect to an award granted under the plan to him or her must be satisfied by the employee when the award is exercised or when the award’s benefits become payable or are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The plan gives several different methods that the Committee can use or permit to ensure that such purchase price and tax withholding requirements are satisfied.

50




Further, in no event shall the Company ever be obligated to issue or deliver any common shares in connection with an award granted under the 2017 LTIP unless and until the Company determines that such issuance or delivery will not constitute a violation of the provisions of any applicable law (or regulation issued under such law) or the rules of any securities exchange on which common shares are listed.
All awards granted under the 2017 LTIP will be subject to any compensation, clawback and recoupment policies that may be applicable to the employees of the Company.
Vote Required
Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common shares and 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, voting as one class, present or represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be considered shares present and entitled to vote on the shareholder proposal and will not have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of this proposal.
Our Recommendation
The Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan.


51



Item 5 - Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “2017 Directors Plan”), a stock-based plan for non-employee directors. The proposed 2017 Directors Plan is intended to replace the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which expires in May 2017. After the expiration of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, no awards will be granted under that plan, although outstanding awards under that plan will remain outstanding. THE FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED 2017 DIRECTORS PLAN IS SET FORTH IN APPENDIX II OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT, AND THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH TEXT.
The purposes of the 2017 Directors Plan are (i) to attract and retain the services of experienced and knowledgeable persons to serve as independent directors of the Company for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders, and (ii) to provide additional incentive for such directors to continue to work for the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. If approved by the Company’s shareholders, the plan will be effective as of May 4, 2017. No awards will be made under the 2017 Directors Plan unless it is approved by the shareholders. If the 2017 Directors Plan is not approved by the shareholders. the Company will lose the ability to issue any equity-based compensation to it non-employee directors and all non-employee director compensation will be paid in cash.
The principal provisions of the 2017 Directors Plan are as follows.
1. Administration. The 2017 Directors Plan will be administered by the Board. Subject to the limits and terms of the plan, the Board has the authority to (i) make awards under the plan, (ii) interpret the terms of the plan, and (iii) perform all other administrative actions necessary for the plan.
2. Outside Directors Eligible to Receive Awards. Only a member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company (an “Outside Director”) is eligible to be granted an award under the 2017 Directors Plan. There are at present eight Outside Directors. Because the 2017 Directors Plan provides broad discretion in selecting the types of awards, the benefits to be awarded to any Outside Directors cannot be determined at this time.
3. Types of Awards. An Outside Director is eligible to receive a grant under the 2017 Directors Plan on the first date of such individual’s first term of office as an Outside Director and/or on the date of any annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company. The awards to be granted under the plan may consist of one or a combination of the following forms of awards: (i) stock options, (ii) stock units and/or (ii) stock awards. No award may be granted under the plan after May 3, 2027.
(a) Stock Options. A stock option represents an option to purchase, over a certain time period not to exceed ten years, a number of common shares at a fixed purchase price. The fixed purchase price of any common share acquired under any stock option granted under the plan shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a common share on the grant date of the option. No stock option granted under the plan may be an ISO.
(b) Stock Units. A stock unit represents the right to receive a common share or an amount based on the value of a common share at a future date. The Board may grant stock units that are payable on terms and conditions determined by the Board, which may include payment after a specified additional period of service as an Outside Director for vesting. The Outside Director will have no voting rights or rights to receive cash dividends with respect to stock units unless and until common shares are issued in settlement of such award. The Board may grant dividend equivalents in connection with stock units, which are rights to receive additional stock units or cash amounts on stock units that vest based on the value of any cash dividends the Company declares prior to the settlement of the vested stock units.
(c) Stock Awards. A stock award constitutes common shares that either (i) have no restrictions or (ii) may not be disposed of by the Outside Director to whom they are awarded until certain restrictions lapse (and that will ultimately be forfeited to the extent such restrictions are not satisfied). The Board may establish conditions under which restrictions on stock awards shall lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Board deems appropriate. The Board shall determine to what extent and under what conditions the recipient of a stock award will have the right to vote and to receive cash dividends during any restricted period.

52




4. Grants of Awards. The Board shall exercise its discretion when determining whether to grant any awards as of any date with the intent that the awards that are granted to Outside Directors under the 2017 Directors Plan, together with other compensation that is either paid in the form of common shares or has its value determined in relation to the value of common shares (“equity-based compensation”) and taking into account the fair market value of the common shares when granting or providing such equity-based compensation, provides equity-based compensation for the Outside Directors that each year is approximately equal to the median level of the value of equity-based compensation provided by a group of comparable peer group companies to their non-employee directors.
All awards shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate and as are specified in writing by the Board to the Outside Director in an award agreement.
The vesting period of any award shall be a minimum of one year from the date of grant (or, if earlier, the first annual meeting of the Company shareholders after the date on which the award is granted, provided that such date is no more than two weeks before the one year anniversary of the date of grant). Notwithstanding the previous sentence, the Award Agreement may provide for vesting to occur upon the Outside Director’s death, disability, retirement or in the event of a change in control.
5. Common Shares Reserved For Issuance. Subject to adjustment in the case of certain changes in the capital structure of the Company, the following limits apply to the number of common shares that may be issued or transferred under or with respect to awards granted under the 2017 Directors Plan:
(a) The maximum number of common shares which may be issued or transferred under or with respect to all of the awards (considered in the aggregate) granted under the plan during the plan’s entire existence shall be equal to 350,000 common shares.
(b) The aggregate grant date fair value (determined in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all awards granted under the plan to any Outside Director in any calendar year shall not exceed $300,000.
6. Adjustments. The 2017 Directors Plan provides for appropriate adjustments in the number of common shares subject to awards and available for future awards, as well as the maximum award limitations under the plan, in the event of changes in the common shares outstanding by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split or combination, reclassification, merger, consolidation or similar change in the capital structure of the Company.
7. Change in Control. In the event a change in control of the Company (as is defined in the terms of the 2017 Directors Plan) occurs, the Company may continue, assume, or provide substitution for outstanding awards in accordance with the terms of the plan. If and to the extent that awards granted under the 2017 Directors Plan are not continued, assumed, or substituted in the event of a change in control of the Company, then, in general terms, upon the date of the change in control, each such outstanding award will become fully vested, and if applicable, exercisable and any restrictions applicable to such award will lapse.
8. Amendment and Termination. The 2017 Directors Plan may generally be amended or terminated by the Board at any time, provided, however, that the Board may not amend the plan without approval of the shareholders of the Company if shareholder approval is required in order to comply with applicable laws or to comply with applicable stock exchange requirements. No amendment or termination will impair the rights of an Outside Director with respect to a previously granted award without the Outside Director’s consent, unless such right has been reserved in the plan or the Outside Director’s award agreement.
Further, the terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding options or to cancel outstanding options in exchange for cash or other awards of options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original options, without the approval of the Company’s shareholders.
9. Deferrals. The 2017 Directors Plan provides the Committee the discretion to provide for the deferral of an award or permit participants to elect to defer payment of some or all types of awards in a manner consistent with the applicable requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
10. Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following describes, in very general terms, the federal income tax consequences arising with respect to awards granted under the 2017 Directors Plan. Tax consequences may vary depending on particular circumstances, and administrative and judicial interpretations of the application of the federal income tax laws are subject to change.

53



A stock option that is granted to an Outside Director will generally create no tax consequences for the Outside Director or the Company at the time of the grant of the award. Further, upon exercising any stock option, the Outside Director generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the amount by which the fair market value of the common shares that are subject to the portion of the option being exercised, as determined on the date of exercise, exceeds the purchase price of such common shares, and the Company will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount. The treatment to an Outside Director of a disposition of common shares acquired through the exercise of a stock option depends on how long the common shares have been held. Generally, there will be no tax consequence to the Company in connection with a disposition of common shares acquired under a stock option.
A stock unit that is granted to an Outside Director will generally create no tax consequences for the Outside Director or the Company at the time of the grant of the award. Upon settlement of the award, the Outside Director generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any vested common shares received, and the Company will be entitled to a deduction for the same amount.
With respect to a stock award granted under the 2017 Directors Plan to an Outside Director, the Outside Director generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the common shares provided under the award at the first time such common shares are not subject to a substantial risk that they will be forfeited, and the Company will be entitled then to a deduction for the same amount.
In certain cases, such as an award to an Outside Director of restricted stock, the Outside Director may have the right under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to elect to recognize as ordinary income the value of the award when issued instead of when no further substantial risk of forfeiture exists with respect to the award. In the event of such an election, the Company will be entitled to a deduction for such value at the same time.
The foregoing tax rules may be slightly adjusted for an award granted to an Outside Director who is subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
11. Miscellaneous. The 2017 Directors Plan generally requires that any purchase price or tax withholding obligations that apply to an Outside Director with respect to an award granted under the plan to him or her must be satisfied by the Outside Director when the award is exercised or when the award’s common shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. The plan gives several different methods that the Board of Directors can use or permit to ensure that such purchase price and tax withholding requirements are satisfied.
Further, in no event shall the Company ever be obligated to issue or deliver any common shares in connection with an award granted under the 2017 Directors Plan unless and until the Company determines that such issuance or delivery will not constitute a violation of the provisions of any applicable law (or regulation issued under such law) or the rules of any securities exchange on which common shares are listed.
All awards granted under the 2017 Directors Plan will be subject to any compensation, clawback and recoupment policies that may be applicable to the Outside Directors.
Vote Required
Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common shares and 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, voting as one class, present or represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Broker non-votes will not be considered shares present and entitled to vote on the shareholder proposal and will not have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of this proposal.
Our Recommendation
The Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors.


54



Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 regarding securities of the Company to be issued and remaining available for issuance under the equity compensation plans of the Company:
Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of stock, options, awards, warrants and rights (a) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options, awards, warrants and rights (b) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,444,549
(1)17.06
 867,430
(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 31,043
(2)
 
 
Total 1,475,592
 17.06
 867,430
(3)
(1)Includes 389,516 outstanding stock options not yet exercised, 105,815 shares of time-based restricted stock units, and 954,218 shares of performance-based awards, restrictions on which have not expired as of December 31, 2016. Awards were granted under various incentive plans approved by Cincinnati Bell shareholders. There were no outstanding unexercised share-settled stock appreciation rights. The number of performance-based shares assumes the maximum awards that can be earned if the performance conditions are achieved.
(2)The shares to be issued relate to deferred compensation in the form of previously received special awards and annual awards to non-employee directors pursuant to the “Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors.” From 1997 through 2004, the directors received an annual award of phantom stock equivalent to a number of common shares. For years beginning after 2004, the annual award is the equivalent of 1,200 common shares. As a result of a plan amendment effective as of January 1, 2005, upon termination of Board service, non-employee directors are required to take distribution of all annual phantom stock awards in cash. The number of actual shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to the plan as of December 31, 2016 is approximately 2,300. This plan also provides that no awards are payable until such non-employee director completes at least five years of active service as a non-employee director, except if he or she dies while serving as a member of the Board of Directors.
(3)If the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, being voted upon at the 2017 Annual Meeting is approved by the shareholders, an additional 2,700,000 securities will be available for issuance under equity compensation plans approved by shareholders. In addition, if the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors being voted upon at the 2017 Annual Meeting is approved by the shareholders, an additional 350,000 securities will be available for issuance under equity compensation plans approved by shareholders.


55



Audit Matters

Audit Matters

Any general statement that incorporates this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 shall not be deemed to incorporate by reference this Audit and Finance Committee Report and related disclosure. Except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such Report and related disclosure by reference, this information shall not otherwise be deemed to have been filed under such Acts.

Audit and Finance Committee Report

Audit and Finance Committee Report

The Audit and Finance Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with the management of the Company and has reviewed a report from management assessing the Company’s internal controls. The Audit and Finance Committee has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, "Deloitte & Touche LLP"), the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, and Related and Transitional Amendments to PCAOB Standards and as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit and Finance Committee has also received the written disclosures and letter from the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm required by applicable standards of the PCAOB, has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP their independence with respect to the Company, and has considered the question of whether the auditors’ provision of non-audit services was compatible with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm maintaining theirits independence.

Based on its review and discussions referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Audit and Finance Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019 be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

2019.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit and Finance Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the rules and regulations of the SEC and the independence and other requirements of the rules and listing standards of the NYSE. The Board has determined that John W. Eck, Jakki L. Haussler and Lynn A. Wentworth and Jakki L. Haussler are audit committee financial experts as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC and that each member of the Committee is financially literate as defined by the rules and listing standards of the NYSE.

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE

Jakki L. Haussler, Chair

John W. Eck

Craig F. Maier

Russel P. Mayer

Lynn A. Wentworth Chair

Phillip R. Cox
Jakki L. Haussler
Craig F. Maier
Russel P. Mayer
John M. Zrno


56



Other Audit Information
Other Audit Information

Audit Fees

Deloitte & Touche LLP was the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the 20162018 and 20152019 fiscal years. Aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152019 were as follows:

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Audit fees

 

$

2,635,700

 

 

$

2,424,500

 

Audit related fees

 

 

38,000

 

 

 

125,900

 

Tax fees

 

 

52,201

 

 

 

53,717

 

All other fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

2,725,901

 

 

$

2,604,117

 

  2016 2015
Audit fees $1,279,480
 $1,367,800
Audit related fees 164,250
 500,604
Tax fees 7,363
 2,700
All other fees 
 
Total $1,451,093
 $1,871,104

Audit fees

Fees

The audit fees for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152019 were for services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company's annual financial statements, review of quarterly financial statements included in the Company's reports filed with the SEC and services related to requirements established by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  The audit of the Company’s 2019 financial statements included work related to statutory audits, new accounting guidance related to lease accounting and implementation of new systems.  The audit of the Company's 2018 financial statements included work related to the audit of Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. ("Hawaiian Telcom") for the six month period subsequent to the acquisition date, purchase price accounting related to Hawaiian Telcom and new accounting guidance related to revenue and lease accounting.

Audit related fees

Related Fees

The audit related fees for the year ended December 31, 20162019 are primarilydue to work performed related to the bond offerings and due diligence projects.  The audit related fees for the year ended December 31, 2015 were for various accounting consultations2018 are primarily related to work performed related to the acquisition of Hawaiian Telcom and due diligence projects.

Tax fees

Fees

Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152019 were for the preparation of various tax filings and tax consultations.

All other fees

Other Fees

None.

Engagement of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Pre-Approval Policy

In accordance with its charter, the Audit and Finance Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, if necessary, replace the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit and Finance Committee has the sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms. In addition, the Audit and Finance Committee, or the Chairpersonchair of the Audit and Finance Committee between regularly scheduled meetings, must pre-approve all services provided to the Company by the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Pursuant to Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit and Finance Committee pre-approved every engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP to perform audit or non-audit services on behalf of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015.

2019.


57



Item 6 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Item 3 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Company’s Audit and Finance Committee Charter provides that the Committee shall have the sole authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, if necessary, replace the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

On January 25, 2017,30, 2020, the Audit and Finance Committee retained Deloitte & Touche LLP as its Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

2020.

The Company is asking the shareholders to ratify the Committee’s appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2020. If the shareholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit and Finance Committee will consider the results of the vote and determine whether to appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

2020.

One or more members of the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP will attend the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to answer questions.

Vote Required

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common shares and 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, voting as one class, present or represented at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Since the Company believes this proposal to be “routine,” broker non-votes will likely be voted by the organizations holding such shares in their discretion.

Our Recommendation

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” such ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year 2017.

2020.




58



Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting
Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting

Q: Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

A: The Company's Board is providing thesedelivering this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy materials to you in connection with the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will take place on May 4, 2017.September 24, 2020. This proxy statement is intended to assist you in making an informed vote on the proposals described in the proxy statement. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card and other materials are first being mailed on or around August 11, 2020, in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Company’s Board. As a shareholder, you are invited to attend the meetingAnnual Meeting and are entitled to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

Q: What information is contained in the package of materials that I received?

A: The Company's combined proxy statement, Summary 20162019 Annual Report and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, which includes our 20162019 consolidated financial statements, contains information relating to the proposals to be voted on at the meeting,Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of directors and certain officers and certain other information required by the rules and regulations of the SEC and the rules and listing standards of the NYSE.  Although you are encouraged to vote either by the internet or by telephone, these materials if received in printed form, also include a proxy card or voting instruction card for your use in voting by mail or at the Annual Meeting.

On October 4, 2016, the Company effected a 1-for-5 reverse stock split of our common shares (the "Reverse Stock Split"). All share amounts, per share amounts and share prices reflected in this proxy statement have been adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.

Q: What proposals will be voted on at the meeting?

A1:The election of nine directors to serve a one-year term ending in 2018;
A2:The recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers' compensation;
A3:
The approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers' compensation;

A4:The approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
A5:The approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors; and
A6:The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year 2017.
Annual Meeting?

A1: The election of ten directors to serve a one-year term ending in 2021;

A2: The approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers' compensation; and

A3: The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for 2020.

Q: What is the Board of Directors' voting recommendation?

A: The Board recommends that you vote your shares:

“FOR” each of the Company's nominees to the Board;

For "1 YEAR" as the recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers' compensation;

“FOR” the advisory approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers' compensation; and

“FOR” the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
“FOR” the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors; and

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for the year 2017.2020.

Q:  Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

A: Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the Company has elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet.  Accordingly, we sent a Notice to our shareholders of record and beneficial owners, which instructs them as to how they may submit their proxy on the internet.  If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.  In addition, you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or by email on an ongoing basis.


59



Q: How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

A: Instructions regarding how to view the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the internet and to instruct the Company to send future proxy materials to you via email or in printed form are included in the Notice and on the website.  If you elect to receive future proxy materials by email, the Company will save the cost of printing and mailing the proxy materials.  You will also receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site.  The election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.


Q: What shares can I vote?

A: You may vote all Company common shares and 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares that you own (or for which you have been given the right to provide instructions as to how such shares should be voted) as of the close of business on the Record Date.Date, which is July 27, 2020.  This includes: (i) shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record, including common shares purchased through the Cincinnati Bell Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (ii) shares that are held by a trust used in connection with a Company employee or director plan pursuant to which the value of such shares has been credited to your account under such plan; and (iii) shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker or other nominee.

Q: What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

A: Many Cincinnati Bell shareholders hold their shares through a broker or other nominee rather than directly in their own name.  As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Shareholder of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with Cincinnati Bell’s transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, LLC, you are considered the shareholder of record for those shares.  As a shareholder of record, you may grantvote your voting proxy overshares via the internet, by mail, by telephone or you may vote your shares in person atonline during the meeting.

Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by another nominee (including a trust used in connection with a Company employee or director plan), you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and your broker or nominee is considered to be the shareholder of record. If you are a participant in the Cincinnati Bell Inc. Retirement Savings Plan or the Cincinnati Bell Inc. Savings and Security Plan, you are the beneficial owner of the shares credited to your account. As the beneficial owner, a Notice and/orthis proxy statement and accompanying form of proxy card waswere forwarded to you by the shareholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you may direct and provide voting instructions to your broker or nominee to vote the shares held in your account by proxy overvia the internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice or the proxy card.  You can also mail your proxy to the Company by following the instructions provided in the proxy card (if forwarded to you by your broker or nominee).   You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting.  However, sinceIf you are notwish to attend the Annual Meeting and vote online during the meeting, you will need to obtain a proxy for your broker (or nominee), the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a signed proxy from the shareholder of record authorizing you to vote the shares.

record.

Q: How can I attend and vote my shares at the meeting?

Annual Meeting?

A: Shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record may be voted in person atonline during the Annual Meeting.  If you choose to attend the meeting and vote in person,online during the Annual Meeting, any prior proxy vote(s) you will need to provide proof of identification and then youpreviously submitted will be presented a proxy card. Beneficialrevoked and replaced by your online vote during the Annual Meeting.  You may vote your beneficial shares, held either in street name or credited to your account under a Company employee or director plan, cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting unlessif you obtain a signed proxy fromfor your broker (or nominee), the shareholder of record, authorizing youprior to vote these shares.

the Annual Meeting.

Q: How can I vote my shares without attending the meeting?

Annual Meeting?

A: The methods for voting without attending the meetingAnnual Meeting are:

By Internet - If you have internet access, you may submit your vote from any location by following the instructions provided in the Notice or the proxy card.

By Telephone - If you live in the United States or Canada, you may submit your vote by following the “Vote by Phone” instructions provided in the Notice or the proxy card.

By Mail - You may vote by mail by completing and signing your proxy card and mailing it in the accompanying enclosed, pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope.



60



Q: What happens if I don't give specific voting instructions?

A: The effect of not providing specific voting instructions depends on if you are the shareholder of record or the beneficial ownerowners of the shares.

Shareholder of Record

If you are a shareholder of record and (i) you indicate when voting on the internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board, or (ii) you sign and return a proxy without giving specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board on each of the matters presented in this proxy statement for which you did not provide specific voting instructions, and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner

If you are deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares and do not provide the broker or nominee that holds your shares with specific voting instructions, the broker or nominee that holds such shares may generally vote on routinematters but cannot vote on non-routine matters, as provided by the rules of the NYSE.  If the broker or nominee that holds such shares does not receive instructions on how to vote on a non-routine matter, the broker or nominee will inform the Inspector of Elections that it does not have authority to vote on such matter with respect to such shares.  This is generally referred to as a “broker"broker non-vote."  The Company encourages you to provide voting instructions to the broker or nominee that holds such shares by carefully following the instructions provided in the proxy card or as described above.

Q:  Which ballot measures are considered "routine" or "non-routine"?

A: Proposal 1 (election of directors), and Proposal 2 (recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers’ compensation), Proposal 3 (advisory approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers'officers’ compensation), Proposal 4 (approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan), and Proposal 5 (approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors), are considered non-routine matters, and your broker or nominee cannot vote your shares without your specific voting instructions.  Proposal 63 (ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm) is considered a routine matter, which generally allows your broker or nominee to vote your shares on this matter even if you do not provide specific voting instructions.

Q: How are abstentions treated?

A: Abstentions are counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. For the purpose of determining whether shareholders have approved Proposal 1 (election of directors), abstentions are not treated as votes cast affirmatively or negatively and, therefore, have no effect on the outcome of such proposal. For the purpose of determining the recommendation of the shareholders for Proposal 2 (recommendation, by non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers’ compensation), abstentions are not treated as votes cast for any of the frequency options, and therefore have no effect on the outcome of such proposal. For the purpose of determining whether shareholders have approved Proposal 32 (advisory approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers'officers’ compensation), Proposal 4 (approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan), Proposal 5 (approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors), and Proposal 63 (ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm), abstentions will have a negative effect on the outcome of such proposals.

Q: Can I change my vote?

A: Yes. You may change your voting instructionsvote at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. You may change your vote by either: (i) granting a new proxy or voting instructions bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy or voting instructions) whether made onvia the internet, by telephone or by mail; (ii) if you are a shareholder of record, notifying the Company’s Corporate Secretary in writing that you want to revoke your earlier proxy; or (iii) if you are a shareholder of record attending the Annual Meeting giving notice of your proxy revocation in open meeting and voting in person. Please note that in order to revoke your previously granted proxyonline during the Annual Meeting (your attendance at the Annual Meeting you must specifically request the revocation ofwill not, by itself, revoke your previous proxy.

proxy).

Q: What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice or more than one proxy card?

A: It means that your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for all Notices and proxy cards that you receive.


61



Q: Where can I find the voting results of the meeting?

Annual Meeting?

A: We will announce preliminary voting results at the meetingAnnual Meeting and publish final results in the Company'sCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed on or before May 10, 2017.September 30, 2020.



Q: What happens if additional proposals are presented at the meeting?

Annual Meeting?

A: Other than the proposals described in this proxy statement, we do not expect any matters to be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxy holders, Phillip R. Cox,Lynn A. Wentworth, Jakki L. Haussler and Craig F. Maier, will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting.Annual Meeting.  If for any unforeseen reason any of the nominees are not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the Board.

Q: What classes of shares are entitled to be voted?

A: Each common share and each 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share outstanding as of the close of business on the Record Date is entitled to vote on all itemsproposals being voted upon at the Annual Meeting.  You are entitled to one vote for each common share and one vote for each 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Share you own of record on the Record Date or to provide instructions on how to vote such shares in which you have a beneficial interest.  The 6 3/4%Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares will vote with the common shares as one class on each of the proposals described in this proxy statement.  There are no cumulative voting rights for either class of shares.  On the Record Date, we had 42,131,33450,680,605 outstanding common shares and 155,250 6 3/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares outstanding.

Q: What is the quorum requirement for the meeting?

Annual Meeting?

A: The quorum requirement for holding the meetingAnnual Meeting and transacting business is the presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the common and preferred shares issued and outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to vote at such meeting. However, if any particular action requires more than a simple majority because of the law, the NYSE rules, the Company’s Amended Articles of Incorporation or the Company’s Amended and Restated Regulations, that particular action will not be approved unless the required percentage of affirmative votes has been obtained or the required number of votes has been cast.

  If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will not be adjourned until a quorum is obtained.

Abstentions are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. If a routine matter is to be voted upon, broker non-votes are also counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Since there is a routine matter to be voted upon this year, broker non-votes will be counted for determining the existence of a quorum.

Q: Who will count the votes?

A: A representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”("Broadridge") will tabulate the votes and act as the Inspector of Elections.

Q: Is my vote confidential?

A: Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects voting privacy.  Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties except (i) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (ii) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or (iii) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation by the Board.  Occasionally, shareholders provide written comments on their proxy card, which are forwarded to the Company’s management.

Q: Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the meeting?

Annual Meeting?

A: The Company is making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing the proxy materials. If you choose to access the proxy materials and/or vote via the internet, you are responsible for any internet access charges you may incur. In addition to the costs of mailing the proxy materials, the Company may also incur costs to provide additional copies of these proxy materials (if requested) and for its directors, officers and employees to solicit proxies or votes in person, by telephone or by electronic communication. Our directors, officers and employees will not receive any additional compensation for such activities. We have hired Georgeson Inc. to solicit proxies for approximately $11,000 plus expenses. We have also hired Broadridge for a fee of approximately $10,000 plus expenses to assist us in facilitating the voting of proxies over the internet and serving as the Inspector of Elections.  We will also reimburse brokerage houses and other nominees for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to shareholders.



62



Q: What percentage of the Company's issued and outstanding voting shares do our directors and executive officers beneficially own?

A: Our directors and executive officers owned 1.4%1.8% of our voting shares as of the Record Date.

Q: Do any of our shareholders hold more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of any class of the Company's voting stock?

A: As of the Record Date or an earlier date, if indicated, each of the following entities (together with their affiliates) indicated that it held more than 5% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company: GAMCO Investors,BlackRock, Inc. and affiliates, Blackrock,, Nomura Holdings, Inc., The Vanguard Group, and Pinnacle Associates, Ltd.Credit Suisse AG/.  As of the Record Date or an earlier date, if indicated, the following entity (together with its affiliates) indicated that it held more than 5% of the issued and outstanding 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares (or of the depositary shares representing interests in such 6 ¾% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares) of the Company:  Private Management Group, Inc.  See page 1820 for more details on the number of shares owned and percentage ownership as of the Record Date or an earlier date, if indicated.

Q: What is householding?

A: Householding is a process that allows the Company to reduce costs and increase efficiencies by mailing only one copy of Company communications to multiple shareholders who reside at the same household mailing address. If you and other shareholders at the same household mailing address are currently receiving only one copy of Company communications but would like to receive separate copies or are currently receiving multiple copies of Company communications but would like to participate in our householding program, please see the instructions on page 64.

58.

Q: Who can I contact if I have questions or need assistance in voting my shares or if I need additional copies of the proxy materials?

A: Please contact Broadridge, the firm assisting the Company in the solicitation of proxies, toll free at 1-800-579-1639.



63



Communications and Other Shareholder's Proposals
Communications and Other Shareholder's Proposals

Mailing Address of Principal Executive Office

The mail address of our principal executive office is:

Cincinnati Bell Inc.

221 East Fourth Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202

Shareholder Proposals for Next Year's Annual Meeting

Shareholder

Unless the timing of the closing of the MIRA merger is materially delayed from its expected timetable, the Company will likely not hold an annual meeting in 2021.

In the event that an annual meeting is held in 2021, shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement should be sent to Connie M. Vogt, Corporate Secretary, Cincinnati Bell Inc., 221 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and must be received by Novemberthe close of business on April 13, 2021, or if the 2021 annual meeting does not take place within 30 days from September 24, 2017.2021, then the deadline will be a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials (which deadline we would announce when we announce the date of the annual meeting).  Any such proposal must comply with Rule 14a-8 promulgated by the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. If

In the Company does not receive written notice by February 7, 2018 of a proposal from a shareholder who intends to propose any other matter to be acted upon at the 2018 Annual Meeting, the persons namedevent that an annual meeting is held in the Company’s proxy for the 2018 Annual Meeting will be allowed to exercise their discretionary authority to vote upon any such proposal.

Shareholders2021, shareholders may propose director candidates for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board. Any such recommendations should be directed to Connie M. Vogt, Corporate Secretary, Cincinnati Bell Inc., 221 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and must be received no later than November 24, 2017April 13, 2021 for the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

In the event that an annual meeting is held in 2021, in accordance with Article IX of the Company's Amended and Restated Regulations granting proxy access to shareholders, an eligible shareholder seeking to include a shareholder-nominated candidate in the Company's proxy materials for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit the required nomination and supporting documents so that the Company receives them no earlier than March 14, 2021 and no later than April 13, 2021.  However, in the event that the annual meeting is not scheduled to be held between July 12, 2021 and September 10, 2021, an eligible shareholder must submit the required nomination notice in the manner provided in the Company’s Amended and Restated Regulations by the later of the close of business on the date that is 180 days prior to the annual meeting or the tenth day following the date the annual meeting is first publicly announced or disclosed.

Other Matters to Come Before the Annual Meeting

At the time this proxy statement was released to the shareholders on March 24, 2017,August 11, 2020, the Company knew of no other matters that might be presented for action at the meeting.Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting,Annual Meeting, it is intended that the voting shares represented by proxies will be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting them.

Financial Statements and Corporate Governance Documents Available

The Company has elected to provide access to its proxy statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and Summary Annual Report over the internet. We sent the Notice of Internet Availability to our shareholders and beneficial owners, which provides information and instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the internet or to request printed copies of our proxy materials.

You may also obtain a copy of any of the following corporate governance documents from the Company’s website identified below:

Corporate Governance Document

Website

Audit and Finance Committee Charter

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/af-charter

Compensation Committee Charter

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/compensation-committee-charter

Governance and Nominating Committee

Charter

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/gn-committee-charter

Code of Business Conduct

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/code-of-conduct


Corporate Governance Document

Website

Code of Ethics for Senior Financial

Officers

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/code-of-ethics

Code of Ethics for Directors

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/code-of-ethics

Corporate Governance Guidelines

https://www.cincinnatibell.com/about-us/governance/corporate-governance-guidelines


64



Proxy Statements for Shareholders Sharing the Same Household Mailing Address

As part of the Company’s efforts to reduce costs and increase efficiency, when possible, only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, as appropriate, the proxy materials, has been delivered to multiple shareholders sharing the same household mailing address, unless the Company has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders at that address.

Upon written or oral request, the Company will promptly provide a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, as appropriate, the proxy materials, to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy was delivered. If your household mailing address is shared with other shareholders and you did not receive athe Notice of Internet Availability or, as appropriate, the proxy materials, but would like to receive a separate copy of this item as well as future Company communications, please contact the following:

For beneficial owners, please contact your broker.

For shareholders of record, please contact our transfer agent, Computershare, at the following address:

Computershare Investor Services, LLC

Shareholder Services

7530 Lucerne Drive, Suite 305

Cleveland, Ohio 44130-6557

Phone: (888) 294-8217

If shareholders residing at the same household mailing address are currently receiving multiple copies of Company communications but would like to receive only one in the future, please send written notice to your broker (for beneficial owners) or to Computershare (for shareholders of record) at the above address. In the written notice, please indicate the names of all accounts in your household, and you will be forwarded the appropriate forms for completion.

Each shareholder participating in the householding program will, however, continue to receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card.

Electronic Delivery of Materials

Shareholders can also enroll for electronic delivery of the Company’s future proxy materials by registering directly or with your broker through our website, investor.cincinnatibell.com in the Electronic Shareholder Communications Enrollment section of the Company’s Investor Relations webpage.

Each shareholder participating in the electronic delivery of materials will, however, continue to receive a separate Notice, proxy card or voting instruction card.


Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Shareholders or other interested parties may communicate with the Board, any individual director, the non-management directors as a group, or the director who presides at meetings of the non-management directors. The Company has established procedures for such shareholder communications. Shareholders and other interested parties should send any communications to Connie M. Vogt, Corporate Secretary, Cincinnati Bell Inc., 221 East Fourth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and identify the intended recipient or recipients. All communications addressed to the Board or any identified director or directors will be forwarded to the identified person or persons.

By Order of the Board of Directors

connievogtsigntuarev1a01.jpg

Connie M. Vogt

Corporate Secretary

March 24, 2017

August 11, 2020


65



Schedule 1
Schedule 1 - Telecommunications Peer Group

Cincinnati Bell Inc.

General Industry Peer Group
The companies comprising the General Industry Peer Group in the CD&A are set forth below:
A.O. SmithCloud Peak EnergyHarsco
Aaron'sColumbia SportswearHerman Miller
Acuity BrandsConvergysHexcel
Advanced Drainage SystemsCooper Standard AutomotiveHNI
Alexion PharmaceuticalsCovanceHNTB
AllegionCubicHoughton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing
American Crystal SugarCurtiss-WrightHusky Injection Molding Systems*
Americas StyrenicsCytec IndustriesICF International
AnsellDay & ZimmermannIDEX Corporation
Arby's Restaurant GroupDeluxeIDEXX Laboratories
Arcadis*Dematic Corporation*IMS Health
Armstrong World IndustriesDentsplyIntelsat
Arup USA*DonaldsonIntercontinental Hotels Group*
AvintivDST SystemsInternational Flavors & Fragrances
Blount InternationalE.W. ScrippsInternational Game Technology
BMC SoftwareEastman KodakIrvine
Bob Evans FarmsEdwards LifesciencesITT Corporation
BradyEndoJack in the Box
Brembo*EquifaxK. Hovnanian Companies
Brickman GroupEquity Office PropertiesKate Spade & Company
Broadridge Financial SolutionsESCOKB Home
C.R. BardEsterline TechnologiesKennametal
CapsugelFOCUS BrandsKeysight Technologies
Carmeuse North America Group*G&K ServicesLincoln Electric
Carpenter TechnologyGAF MaterialsLinkedIn
Catalent Pharma SolutionsGeneral AtomicsMagellan Midstream Partners
CDK GlobalGracoMartin Marietta Materials
ChemturaGranite ConstructionMatthews International
Children's PlaceH.B. FullerNavigant Consulting
Clearwater Paper CorporationHalyard HealthNBTY
NortekSelect ComfortTupperware Brands
Nu Skin EnterprisesServiceMaster CompanyUBM*
Nuance CommunicationsSigma-AldrichUnderwriters Laboratories
OuterwallSolenisUnisys
PAREXELSpirit AirlinesUnited Launch Alliance
ParsonsSteelcaseVectrus
PlexusSunCoke EnergyVentura Foods
RackspaceSunGard Data SystemsVerint Systems
Rayonier Advanced MaterialsTeleTechVesuvius*
Recreational EquipmentTempur SealyVulcan Materials
Regal-BeloitTeradataWalter Energy
RevlonTimkenWendy's Group
Rowan CompaniesTimkenSteelWest Pharmaceutical Services
SAS InstituteToroWhiteWave Foods
ScholasticTotal System Services (TSYS)Wilsonart
Schwan Food CompanyTribune MediaYP
Scotts Miracle-GroTribune Publishing
Scripps Networks InteractiveTronox
*Subsidiary


66



Schedule 2
Cincinnati Bell Inc.

Telecommunications Peer Group

The companies comprising the Telecommunications Peer Group are listed below:

ATN International, Inc.

ORBCOMM Inc.

CenturyLink, Inc.

SBA Communications Corp.

Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.

Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.

Spok Holdings, Inc.

Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc.

Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.

Frontier Communications Corporation

United States Cellular Corporation

General Communications Inc.

Vonage Holdings Corp.

GTT Communications, Inc.

Windstream Holdings, Inc.

IDT Corporation

Zayo Group Holdings, Inc.

Iridium Communications, Inc.



ATN International, Inc.

Shenandoah Telecommunications

Centurylink, Inc.

Spok Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.Telephone & Data Systems Inc.
EarthLink Holdings Corp.Time Warner Inc.
Fairpoint Communications, Inc.T-Mobile US, Inc.
Frontier Communications CorporationUnited States Cellular Corp.
General Communications Inc.Vonage Holdings Corp.
IDT CorporationWindstream Corp.
Level 3 Communications Inc.Zayo Group Holdings, Inc.
SBA Communications Corp.



67



Appendix I
CINCINNATI BELL INC.
2017 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1Effectiveness. As of the Effective Date (as defined below), the Cincinnati Bell, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby established.
1.2Purpose. The purposes of this Plan are to (i) further the long-term growth of the Company by offering competitive incentive compensation related to long term performance goals to those Employees (as defined below) of Cincinnati Bell Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries who will be responsible for planning and directing such growth, (ii) reinforce a commonality of interest between Company shareholders and the Employees who participate in the Plan, and (iii) aid the Company in attracting and retaining Employees of outstanding abilities and specialized skills.
1.3Effective Date and Duration of Plan. The Plan is effective on the Effective Date, as described in Section 2.11, and shall remain in effect until the earliest of (i) the date on which the Plan is terminated in accordance with Section 19.1, (ii) the date on which the maximum number of shares of Company Stock which may be issued or transferred under the Plan (as determined under Section 5 of the Plan) have been issued or transferred or (iii) May 3, 2027. After termination of the Plan, no Awards may be granted under the Plan but any Award granted under the Plan prior to the Plan’s termination shall remain outstanding in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the terms of the Award Agreement.
SECTION 2
DEFINITIONS
As used in the Plan, the following terms will have the respective meanings set forth below:
2.1“Awardmeans an Option, Stock Unit, Stock Award, SAR, Other Stock-Based Award or Nonstock-Based Award granted under the Plan.
2.2“Award Agreementmeans the written instrument (which may be in electronic form) that sets forth the terms and conditions of an Award, including all amendments thereto.
2.3Boardmeans the Company’s Board of Directors.
2.4A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have taken place for purposes of the Plan if:
(a)a majority of the Board of the Company as of any date is not composed of Incumbent Directors. For purposes hereof, as of any date, the term “Incumbent Director" means any individual who is a director of the Company as of such date and either: (A) who was a director of the Company at the beginning of the 24 consecutive month period ending on such date or (B) who became a director subsequent to the beginning of such 24 consecutive month period and whose appointment, election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least two‑thirds of the directors who were, as of the date of such vote, Incumbent Directors (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director). It is provided however, that no individual initially appointed, elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or as a result of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall ever be deemed to be an Incumbent Director;
(b)any “person” (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d‑3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board (the “Company Voting Securities”); provided, however, that the event described in this paragraph (b) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control if such event results from any of the following: (A) the acquisition of any Company Voting Securities by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (B) the acquisition of any Company Voting Securities by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (C) the acquisition of any Company Voting Securities by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (D) a Non‑Qualifying Transaction (as defined in paragraph (c) of this Section 2.4);

68



(c)the consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries (a “Reorganization”) or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to an entity that is not an affiliate of the Company (a “Sale”), that in each case requires the approval of the Company's stockholders under the law of the Company's jurisdiction of organization, whether for such Reorganization or Sale (or the issuance of securities of the Company in such Reorganization or Sale), unless immediately following such Reorganization or Sale: (A) more than 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of (x) the entity resulting from such Reorganization, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (in either case, the "Surviving Entity"), or (y) if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity (the "Parent Entity"), is represented by Company Voting Securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such Reorganization or Sale (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company Voting Securities were converted pursuant to such Reorganization or Sale), and such voting power among the holders thereof is in substantially the same proportion as the voting power of such Company Voting Securities among the holders thereof immediately prior to the Reorganization or Sale, (B) no person (other than any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Surviving Entity or the Parent Entity), is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the outstanding voting securities of the Parent Entity (or, if there is no Parent Entity, the Surviving Entity) and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors (or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Parent Entity (or, if there is no Parent Entity, the Surviving Entity) following the consummation of the Reorganization or Sale were, at the time of the approval by the Board of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Reorganization or Sale, Incumbent Directors (any Reorganization or Sale which satisfies all of the criteria specified in (A), (B) and (C) above being deemed to be a “Non‑Qualifying Transaction”); or
(d)the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company and the Company consummates such liquidation or dissolution.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control of the Company shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 30% of the Company Voting Securities as a result of the acquisition of Company Voting Securities by the Company which reduces the number of Company Voting Securities outstanding; provided that, if after such acquisition by the Company such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control of the Company shall then occur.
Also notwithstanding the foregoing, for any Awards subject to the requirements of Code Section 409A that will become payable on a Change in Control, the transaction constituting a “Change in Control” must also constitute a “change in control event” for purposes of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(v).
2.5Codemeans the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as interpreted in Treasury Regulations or other guidance.
2.6Committeemeans the Compensation Committee of the Board or another committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan. The Committee shall, in any event, consist of at least three members of the Board (i) who are neither officers nor Employees of the Company, (ii) who are non-employee directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3, and (iii) who are outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m) and related Treasury Regulations.
2.7Companymeans Cincinnati Bell Inc.
2.8“Company Stockmeans the common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, or any stock or other securities of the Company hereafter issued or issuable in substitution or exchange for the common stock.
2.9Disabilityor Disabledmeans, with respect to a Participant, that the Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months; provided, however when used in association with an ISO, the Participant must also be disabled within the meaning of Code Section 22(e)(3). The Participant’s Disability shall be determined under procedures established by the Committee. Further, if a Participant fails to reasonably cooperate with the Committee’s attempt to determine whether he or she is disabled, then, notwithstanding any other evidence of disability that exists, the Committee shall have the right to determine that no condition of Disability exists as to the Participant.

69



2.10“Dividend Equivalentmeans an amount calculated with respect to a Stock Unit, which is determined by multiplying the number of shares of Company Stock subject to the Stock Unit by the per-share cash dividend, or the per-share fair market value (as determined by the Committee) of any dividend in consideration other than cash, paid by the Company on its Company Stock. If interest is credited on accumulated dividend equivalents, the term “Dividend Equivalent” shall include the accrued interest.
2.11Effective Date” of the Plan means May 4, 2017, provided that the Plan is approved by the shareholders of the Company on that date.
2.12Employeemeans an employee of the Employer (including an officer or director who is also an employee), but excluding any person who is classified by the Employer as a “contractor” or “consultant,” no matter how characterized by the Internal Revenue Service, other governmental agency or a court.
2.13“Employermeans the (i) Company and each other corporation that is part of a controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of Code Section 1563(a), but determined without regard to Code Section 1563(a)(4) and (e)(3)(C)) that includes the Company, and (ii) each other organization (a partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.) that is under common control (within the meaning of Code Section 414(b)) with the Company.
2.14“Exchange Actmeans the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2.15“Exercise Pricemeans the per share price at which shares of Company Stock may be purchased under an Option, as designated by the Committee.
2.16“Fair Market Valueof Company Stock means, (i) if the principal trading market for the Company Stock is a national securities exchange, the last reported sale price of Company Stock during regular trading hours on the relevant date or (if there were no trades on that date) the last reported sale price of Company Stock during regular trading hours on the next following date upon which a sale is reported, (ii) if the Company Stock is not principally traded on such exchange, the mean between the last reported “bid” and “asked” prices of Company Stock on the relevant date, as reported on the over the counter market, or (iii) if the Company Stock is not publicly traded or, if publicly traded, is not so reported, the Fair Market Value per share shall be as determined by the Committee.
2.17“Incentive Stock Option” or “ISOmeans an Option that is intended to meet the requirements of an incentive stock option under Code Section 422.
2.18“Nonqualified Stock Optionmeans an Option that is not intended to be taxed as an incentive stock option under Code Section 422.
2.19Nonstock-Based Award” means an Award granted under Section 12 of the Plan that by its terms provides for compensation (upon, if applicable, its exercise or the meeting of certain performance goals or other criteria or conditions) based on a dollar amount, regardless of whether the Award’s compensation may be payable in cash, Company Stock or other property, or a combination thereof.
2.20 “Optionmeans an option to purchase shares of Company Stock, as described in Section 7.
2.21“Other Stock-Based Awardmeans any Award based on, measured by or payable in Company Stock (other than an Option, Stock Unit, Stock Award or SAR), as described in Section 11.
2.22“Participantmeans an Employee designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan.
2.23“Qualified Performance-Based Compensation” means “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and the Treasury Regulations issued thereunder.
2.24“Planmeans this Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time.
2.25“SARmeans a stock appreciation right as described in Section 10.
2.26“Stock Awardmeans an Award of Company Stock as described in Section 9.
2.27“Stock Unitmeans an Award of a phantom unit representing one share of Company Stock, as described in Section 8, which may include but not be limited to a Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) or Performance Stock Unit (“PSU”), both as described in Section 8.

70



2.28Treasury Regulations” means regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury under the Code.
SECTION 3
ADMINISTRATION
3.1Committee. The Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Committee. Ministerial functions may be performed by an administrative committee comprised of Company employees appointed by the Committee.
3.2Committee Authority. The Committee shall have the sole authority to (i) determine the Participants to whom Awards shall be made under the Plan, (ii) determine the type, size and terms and conditions of the Awards to be made to each such Participant, (iii) determine the time when the Awards will be made and the duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability, (iv) amend the terms and conditions of any previously issued Award, subject to the provisions of Section 19, and (v) deal with any other matters arising under the Plan.
3.3Committee Determinations. The Committee shall have full power and express discretionary authority to administer and interpret the Plan, to make factual determinations and to adopt or amend such rules, regulations, agreements and instruments for implementing the Plan and for the conduct of its business as it deems necessary or advisable, in its sole discretion. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the Committee shall have the exclusive right to: (i) interpret the Plan and the Award Agreements executed hereunder; (ii) decide all questions concerning eligibility for, and the amount of, Awards granted under the Plan; (iii) construe any ambiguous provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement; (iv) prescribe the form of Award Agreements; (v) correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement; (vi) issue administrative guidelines as an aid to administering the Plan and make changes in such guidelines as the Committee from time to time deems proper; (vii) make regulations for carrying out the Plan and make changes in such regulations as the Committee from time to time deems proper; (viii) determine whether Awards should be granted singly or in combination; (ix) to the extent permitted under the Plan, grant waivers of Plan terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations; (x) to the extent permitted under the Plan, accelerate the exercise, vesting or payment of an Award when such action or actions would be in the best interests of the Company; (xi) require Participants to hold a stated number or percentage of shares of Company Stock acquired pursuant to an Award for a stated period; and (xii) take any and all other actions the Committee deems necessary or advisable for the proper operation or administration of the Plan. The decisions of the Committee and its actions with respect to the Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons having or claiming to have any right or interest in or under the Plan.
3.4Delegation of Committee’s Authority for Certain Awards. The Committee may delegate to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer its right to make Awards to Employees who (i) are not otherwise considered by the Committee to be subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and (ii) are not expected by the Committee to become “covered employees” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)(3). To the extent the Committee’s right to make Awards to any Employees is delegated to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, any reference to the Committee in the other provisions of the Plan that concern the making of Awards to such Employees, the terms of such Awards, and the verification that all conditions applicable to the payment under or the exercise of such Awards have been met shall be read to refer to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer as if such person was the Committee.
3.5Liability; Indemnification. No member of the Committee, nor any person to whom it has delegated authority, shall be personally liable for any action, interpretation or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or Awards granted hereunder, and each member of the Committee (or delegate of the Committee) shall be fully indemnified and protected by the Company with respect to any liability the member may incur with respect to any such action, interpretation or determination, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.
SECTION 4
AWARDS; MINIMUM VESTING
Awards under the Plan may consist of Options, Stock Units, Stock Awards, SARs, Other Stock-Based Awards and Nonstock-Based Awards. All Awards shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate and as are specified in writing by the Committee to the Participant in the Award Agreement. By acceptance of the Award, a Participant acknowledges that all decisions and determinations of the Committee shall be final and binding on the Participant, his or her beneficiaries and any other person having or claiming an interest under such Award. Awards under a particular Section of the Plan need not be uniform as among the Participants.

71




Notwithstanding the Committee’s discretion granted under the Plan to determine the vesting provisions applicable to an Award, the vesting provisions shall, in all events, be subject to the provisions of this Section 4. Subject to the immediately following sentence, the vesting period of any Award shall be a minimum of one year; incremental vesting of portions of the Award over the vesting period is permitted, provided that incremental vesting shall not result in any Award vesting before the first anniversary of the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Award Agreement may provide (at grant or by amendment) for vesting to occur upon the Participant’s death, Disability, or, subject to the limitations contained herein, in the event of a Change in Control and (ii) subject to all other limits and provisions of the Plan, up to but not in excess of 5% of the total aggregate shares of Company Stock that may be issued or transferred under the Plan (in accordance with Section 5.1 below) may be issued or transferred under Awards with a vesting period (at grant or by amendment) of less than one year (for example, in the case where the Award Agreement provides for immediate vesting or for vesting to occur upon the Participant’s retirement).
SECTION 5
SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN
5.1Shares Authorized. Subject to adjustment as described below in Section 5.5, the total aggregate number of shares of Company Stock that may be issued or transferred under the Plan shall be 2,700,000. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which all Awards of Incentive Stock Options may be made under the Plan shall be 2,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment as described below in Section 5.5.
5.2Share Counting. Upon grant of an Award, the shares of Company Stock reserved for issuance under this Plan pursuant to Section 5.1 shall be debited for the maximum number of shares of Company Stock that might be issuable under an Award. If and to the extent Options or SARs granted under the Plan terminate, expire, or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised, and if and to the extent that any Stock Awards, Stock Units, or Other Stock-Based Awards are forfeited or terminated, or otherwise are not paid in full, the shares to that extent that are reserved for such Awards shall again be available for purposes of the Plan. If shares of Company Stock otherwise issuable under the Plan are surrendered in payment of the Exercise Price of an Option, then the number of shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be permanently reduced by the gross number of shares as to which such Option is exercised. Upon the exercise of a SAR, then both for purposes of calculating the number of shares of Company Stock remaining available for issuance under the Plan and the number of shares of Company Stock remaining available for exercise under such SAR, the number of such shares shall be permanently reduced by the number of shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised, and without regard to the actual shares issued or paid upon settlement of a SAR. Example, SARs for 100 shares, with an Exercise Price of $10 are exercised when Company Stock is worth $20, so 50 shares are issued upon exercise, but the full 100 shares are permanently debited from those reserved under the Plan. If shares of Company Stock otherwise issuable under the Plan are withheld by the Company in satisfaction of the withholding taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, vesting or exercise of any Award or the issuance of Company Stock thereunder, then the number of shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be permanently reduced by the number of shares used to cover the tax withholding. Example: 100 shares are issuable, but 40 of them are withheld to pay income taxes; the number of shares issuable under the Plan remain permanently reduced by 100 shares. To the extent that any Awards are payable only in cash, and not in shares of Company Stock, such Awards shall not count against the share limits in Section 5.1.
5.3Source of Shares. Shares issued or transferred under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Company Stock or reacquired shares of Company Stock, including shares purchased by the Company on the open market for purposes of the Plan.
5.4Individual Limits. All Awards under the Plan except Nonstock-Based Awards shall be expressed in shares of Company Stock. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Company Stock with respect to which all Awards may be made under the Plan to any Participant in a calendar year shall be 2,000,000 shares, 2,000,000 shares via Options and SARs and 2,000,000 shares via Stock Awards, Stock Units, or Other Stock-Based Awards, in each case subject to adjustment as described in Section 5.5 below. The individual limits of this Section 5.4 shall apply without regard to whether the Awards are to be paid in Company Stock or cash. All cash payments (other than with respect to Dividend Equivalents) shall equal the Fair Market Value of the shares of Company Stock to which the cash payments relate. The maximum dollar value of all Nonstock-Based Awards granted under the Plan to any Participant in any calendar year shall be $5,000,000.  The maximum dollar value of any Nonstock-Based Award granted to a Participant shall be deemed to be the maximum dollar amount of cash (or other property) that ultimately could, in the event any and all performance goals and other criteria or conditions applicable to the Award are met, be paid to the Participant under the Award, regardless of (i) whether or not the actual payment under such Award ends up being a lesser dollar amount at the time of payment, or (ii) whether or not the Award or portion thereof is forfeited, expires, or in any other manner terminates without the payment of any compensation.

72



5.5Adjustments. If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of Company Stock outstanding (i) by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split, or combination or exchange of shares, (ii) by reason of a merger, reorganization or consolidation, (iii) by reason of a reclassification or change in par value, or (iv) by reason of any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding Company Stock as a class without the Company’s receipt of consideration, or if the value of outstanding shares of Company Stock is substantially reduced as a result of a spinoff or the Company’s payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the maximum number of shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan, the maximum number of shares of Company Stock for which any individual may receive Awards in any year, the kind and number of shares covered by outstanding Awards, any per-share performance criteria established for vesting of an Award, or the kind and number of shares issued or transferred and to be issued or transferred under the Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such Awards shall be equitably adjusted by the Committee, in such manner as the Committee deems appropriate, to reflect any increase or decrease in the number of, or change in the kind or value of, the issued shares of Company Stock to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of rights and benefits under the Plan and such outstanding Awards; provided, however, that any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment shall be rounded down to the nearest whole share. In addition, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, the provisions of Section 17 of the Plan shall apply. Any adjustments to outstanding Awards shall be consistent with Code Section 409A or 424, to the extent applicable. Any adjustments determined by the Committee shall be final, binding and conclusive.
5.6Effect of Assumption of Awards in Acquisition. If any corporation is acquired by the Company and the Company assumes certain stock-based awards previously granted by such acquired corporation or issues new awards in substitution for such previously-granted awards of the acquired corporation, then, except to the extent expressly provided by action of the Board, the awards so assumed or issued by the Company shall not be deemed to be granted under the Plan and any Company Stock that is the basis of such assumed or substituted awards shall not affect the number of shares of Company Stock that can be issued or paid under the Plan or the number of shares upon which Company Stock Awards granted under the Plan can be based.
SECTION 6
ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION
6.1Eligible Persons. All Employees shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.
6.2Selection of Participants. The Committee shall select the Employees to receive Awards and shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock subject to each Award.
SECTION 7
OPTIONS
7.1General Requirements. The Committee may grant Options to an Employee upon such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate under this Section 7. The Committee shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock that will be subject to each Award of Options.
7.2Type of Option, Price and Term.
(a)The Committee may grant Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options or any combination of the two, all in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
(b)The Exercise Price of Company Stock subject to an Option shall be determined by the Committee and shall be equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date the Option is granted. However, an Incentive Stock Option may not be granted to an Employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary, as defined in Code Section 424, unless the Exercise Price per share is not less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock on the date of grant.
(c)The Committee shall determine the term of each Option, which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant. However, an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to an Employee who, at the time of grant, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary, as defined in Code Section 424, may not have a term that exceeds five years from the date of grant.
7.3Exercisability of Options.
(a)Options shall become exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee and specified in the Award Agreement. The Committee may grant Options that are subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions. The Committee may accelerate the exercisability of any or all outstanding Options at any time for any reason.

73



(b)The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement that the Participant may elect to exercise part or all of an Option before it otherwise has become exercisable. Any shares so purchased shall be restricted shares and shall be subject to a repurchase right in favor of the Company during a specified restriction period, with the repurchase price equal to the lesser of (A) the Exercise Price or (B) the Fair Market Value of such shares at the time of repurchase, or such other restrictions as the Committee deems appropriate.
(c)Options granted to persons who are non-exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, may not be exercisable for at least six months after the date of grant (except that such Options may become exercisable, as determined by the Committee, upon the Participant’s death, Disability or retirement, or upon a Change in Control or other circumstances permitted by applicable regulations).
7.4Termination of Employment. Except as provided in the Award Agreement, an Option may only be exercised while the Participant is still an Employee. The Committee shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances and during what time periods a Participant may exercise an Option after termination of employment; provided, however, that an ISO may not be exercisable later than (i) at the expiration of one year in the event of termination of employment due to Disability; (ii) at the expiration of one year after the Participant’s death, if the termination of employment occurs by reason of death; or (iii) three months following termination of employment for any other reason, unless the Award by its terms provides that, the Option is exercisable longer in certain events and acknowledges that if so exercised later, it will be then converted into a Nonqualified Stock Option
7.5Exercise of Options. A Participant may exercise an Option that has become exercisable, in whole or in part, by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company. The Participant shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option by one or a combination of the following methods: (i) in cash, (ii) by delivering shares of Company Stock owned by the Participant and having a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price or by attestation to ownership of shares of Company Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price, (iii) by payment through a broker in accordance with procedures permitted by the Committee, (iv) unless the Award Agreement provides to the contrary, by net exercise of all or any part of the vested shares of Company Stock for which the Option is exercisable by the Company retaining Company Stock that would otherwise be issued on exercise equal to the dollar amount by which the then Fair Market Value of the shares of Company Stock subject to the surrendered portion exceeds the aggregate Exercise Price payable for those shares, or (v) by such other method as the Committee may approve, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Shares of Company Stock used to exercise an Option shall have been held by the Participant for the requisite period of time to avoid adverse accounting consequences to the Company with respect to the Option. Payment for the shares pursuant to the Option, and any required withholding taxes, must be received by the time specified by the Committee depending on the type of payment being made, but in all cases prior to the issuance of the Company Stock for such exercise.
7.6Limits on Incentive Stock Options. Each Incentive Stock Option shall provide that, if the aggregate Fair Market Value of the stock on the date of the grant with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year, under the Plan or any other stock option plan of the Company or a parent or subsidiary, as defined in Code Section 424, exceeds $100,000, then the Option, as to the excess, shall be treated as a Nonqualified Stock Option. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be granted to any person who is not an Employee of the Company or a parent or subsidiary, as defined in Code Section 424.
SECTION 8
STOCK UNITS
8.1General Requirements. The Committee may grant Stock Units upon such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate under this Section 8. Each Stock Unit shall represent the right of the Participant to receive a share of Company Stock or an amount based on the value of a share of Company Stock. All Stock Units shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan.
8.2Terms of Stock Units. The Committee may grant Stock Units that are payable on terms and conditions determined by the Committee, which may include payment based on achievement of performance goals (a type of Award commonly referred to as “Performance Stock Units” or “PSUs”) or after a specified additional period of employment for vesting (a type of Award commonly referred to a “Restricted Stock Units,” or “RSUs”). Stock Units may be paid at the end of a specified time for vesting or performance period, or payment may be deferred to a date authorized by the Committee. The Committee shall determine the number of Stock Units to be granted and the requirements applicable to such Stock Units.
8.3Payment With Respect to Stock Units. Payment with respect to Stock Units shall be made in cash, in Company Stock, or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee. The Award Agreement shall specify the maximum number of shares that can be issued under the Stock Units.

74



8.4Requirement of Employment. The Committee shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances a Participant may retain Stock Units after termination of the Participant’s employment and the circumstances under which Stock Units may be forfeited.
8.5Dividend Equivalents. The Committee may grant Dividend Equivalents in connection with Stock Units, under such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate, provided that no Dividend Equivalent shall be paid before any vesting or performance condition that applies to Stock Unit to which the Dividend Equivalent relates is satisfied. Until paid, all Dividend Equivalents shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan. Dividend Equivalents may be accrued as a cash obligation, or may be converted to additional Stock Units for the Participant, and Dividend Equivalents may accrue interest, all as determined by the Committee. The Committee may also provide that Dividend Equivalents shall be payable only based on the achievement of additional specific performance goals. Dividend Equivalents may be payable in cash or shares of Company Stock or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee.
SECTION 9
STOCK AWARDS
9.1General Requirements. The Committee may issue shares of Company Stock to an Employee under a Stock Award, upon such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate under this Section 9. Shares of Company Stock issued pursuant to Stock Awards may be issued for cash consideration or for no cash consideration, and subject to restrictions or no restrictions, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may establish conditions under which restrictions on Stock Awards shall lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Committee deems appropriate, including restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals. The Committee shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock to be issued pursuant to a Stock Award.
9.2Requirement of Employment or Service. The Committee shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances a Participant may retain Stock Awards after termination of the Participant’s employment or service and the circumstances under which Stock Awards may be forfeited.
9.3Restrictions on Transfer. For any period when Stock Awards are subject to restrictions, a Participant may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares of a Stock Award except upon death as described in Section 16.1. If certificates are issued, each certificate for a share of a Stock Award shall contain a legend giving appropriate notice of the restrictions in the Award. Shares of a Stock Award that are held at the Company's transfer agent in book-entry form shall contain the appropriate restrictions related to the transfer of such shares. When all restrictions on a share of a Stock Award have lapsed, either the Company shall remove the legend from the issued certificate or the transfer agent shall remove the restrictions from the book-entry, as applicable. The Company may retain possession of any certificates for Stock Awards until all restrictions on such shares have lapsed.
9.4Right to Vote and to Receive Dividends. The Committee shall determine to what extent, and under what conditions, the Participant shall have the right to vote shares of Stock Awards and to receive any dividends or other distributions paid on such shares during the restriction period. Any dividends on Stock Awards shall be withheld while the Stock Awards are subject to restrictions and the dividends shall be payable only upon the lapse of the restrictions on the Stock Awards and subject to such other additional terms and conditions as the Committee determines. Until paid, dividends shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan. Accumulated dividends may accrue interest, as determined by the Committee, and shall be paid in cash, shares of Company Stock, or in such other form as dividends are paid on Company Stock, as determined by the Committee.
SECTION 10
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
10.1General Requirements. The Committee may grant SARs to an Employee separately or in tandem with an Option. The Committee shall establish the number of shares, the terms and the base amount of the SAR at the time the SAR is granted. The base amount of each SAR shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock as of the date of grant of the SAR.

75




10.2Tandem SARs. The Committee may grant tandem SARs either at the time the Option is granted or at any time thereafter while the Option remains outstanding; provided, however, that, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, SARs may be granted only at the date of the grant of the Incentive Stock Option. In the case of tandem SARs, the number of SARs granted to a Participant that shall be exercisable during a specified period shall not exceed the number of shares of Company Stock that the Participant may purchase upon the exercise of the related Option during such period. Upon the exercise of an Option with respect to which a SAR is granted in tandem, the SARs shall terminate; upon the exercise of a SAR, the related Option shall terminate to the extent of an equal number of shares of Company Stock. In the case of a tandem SAR, only the Option to which it relates (and not the tandem SAR itself) shall be counted for purposes of the limits of Section 5.1.
10.3Exercisability; Term. A SAR shall become exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be specified in an Award Agreement. The Committee may grant SARs that are subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions. The Committee shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances and during what periods a Participant may exercise a SAR after termination of employment or service. A tandem SAR shall be exercisable only while the Option to which it is related is exercisable. The Committee shall determine the term of each SAR, which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant.
10.4Awards to Non-Exempt Employees. SARs granted to persons who are non-exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, may not be exercisable for at least six months after the date of grant (except that such SARs may become exercisable, as determined by the Committee, upon the Participant’s death, Disability or retirement, or upon a Change in Control or other circumstances permitted by applicable regulations).
10.5Exercise of SARs. When a Participant exercises SARs, the Participant shall receive in settlement of such SARs an amount equal to the value of the stock appreciation for the number of SARs exercised. The stock appreciation for a SAR is the amount by which the Fair Market Value of the underlying Company Stock on the date of exercise of the SAR exceeds the base amount of the SAR as specified in the Award Agreement.
10.6Deemed Exercise. If, on the date on which an SAR would otherwise terminate or expire, the SAR by its terms remains exercisable and would if exercised, result in payment to its holder, then, immediately prior to such termination or expiration, it shall be deemed exercised.
10.7Form of Payment. The Committee shall determine whether the stock appreciation for a SAR shall be paid in the form of shares of Company Stock, cash or a combination of the two. For purposes of calculating the number of shares of Company Stock to be received, shares of Company Stock shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the SAR. If shares of Company Stock are to be received upon exercise of a SAR, cash shall be delivered in lieu of any fractional share.
SECTION 11
OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS
The Committee may grant other Awards not specified in Sections 7, 8, 9 or 10 above that are based on or measured by Company Stock, on such terms and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted subject to achievement of performance goals or other conditions and may be payable in Company Stock or cash, or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Committee in the Award Agreement.
SECTION 12
NONSTOCK-BASED AWARDS
The Committee may grant Nonstock-Based Awards that grant Participants a right to receive an amount that is equal to a dollar value, or not more than a maximum dollar value, or a percentage of the Participant’s compensation, if and when certain conditions are met, such as the achievement of performance goals or continued employment conditions, as determined by the Committee in the Award Agreement.

76




SECTION 13
QUALIFIED PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION
13.1Designation as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The Committee may determine that Awards (other than Options or SARs) granted to an Employee are desired to be considered Qualified Performance-Based Compensation in which case the provisions of this Section 13 shall apply. For the avoidance of doubt, the Plan also allows the Committee to grant Awards that are not intended to be exempt from Code Section 162(m) as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation; such Awards may have performance criteria similar to that set out in this Section, and the Committee may use similar procedures with respect to such Awards, but shall not be constrained by the terms of Section 162(m) or its requirements as set out in this Section with respect to Awards that it either does not desire to issue within the confines of Section 162(m), either because it wishes to retain more discretion, or the Award will not apply to a “covered employee” as defined in Code Section 162(m) or otherwise. In accordance with the terms of the Plan and applicable Treasury Regulations, Options and SARs shall be deemed to be Qualified Performance-Based Compensation without regard to this Section 13, provided they are awarded by the Committee itself and not its delegate under Section 3.4.
13.2Performance Criteria. When Awards are made under this Section 13, the Committee shall establish in writing (i) the objective Performance Criteria that must be met, (ii) the period during which performance will be measured, (iii) the maximum amounts that may be paid if the Performance Criteria are met, and (iv) any other conditions that the Committee deems appropriate and consistent with the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. The Performance Criteria shall satisfy the requirements for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation, including the requirement that the achievement of the goals be substantially uncertain at the time they are established and that the performance goals be established in such a way that a third party with knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether and to what extent the performance goals have been met. The Committee shall not have discretion to increase the amount of compensation that is payable, but may reduce the amount of compensation that is payable, pursuant to Awards identified by the Committee as Qualified Performance-Based Compensation.
13.3Objective Performance Criteria. The Committee shall use objectively determinable performance goals based on one or more of the following criteria for the Company or any subsidiary, business unit, division, department or any combination of these and may be applied on an absolute basis and/or relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, or any combination thereof, as the Committee shall determine (together, the “Performance Criteria”):
(i)earnings or earnings per share (whether on a pre-tax, after-tax, operational or other basis, diluted or undiluted, and before or after adjustments for extraordinary items and business combination or acquisition and restructuring costs or interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization);
(ii)return on equity;
(iii)return on invested capital;
(iv)return on sales;
(v)net or gross profit;
(vi)net or gross revenues or revenue growth over prior year or as compared to budget;
(vii)expenses or expense levels;
(viii)one or more operating ratios;
(ix)stock price (including, but not limited to, growth measures and total shareholder return);
(x)shareholder return;
(xi)the accomplishment of mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, public offerings or similar extraordinary business transactions;
(xii)economic value added;
(xiii)net or gross income or income growth over prior year or as compared to budget, which, if determined for a subsidiary, department or business unit, may be determined solely with reference to direct costs of that subsidiary, department or business unit;

77



(xiv)free cash flow (defined as cash generated by operating activities, minus capital expenditures and other investing activities, restructuring and severance-related payments, dividend payments and proceeds from the issuance of equity securities, and proceeds from the sale of assets); and
(xv)corporate performance indicators (indices based on the level of certain services provided to customers).
Such performance goals may also be based on the achievement of specified levels of Company performance (or performance of an applicable affiliate, subsidiary, division or business unit of the Company) under one or more of the Performance Criteria described above relative to the Company’s past performance or performance of other corporations. Such performance goals shall be set by the Committee over a specified performance period that shall not be shorter than one year and otherwise within the time period prescribed by, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of, Code Section 162(m), or any successor provision thereto, and the regulations thereunder. The Committee may also provide that, in determining whether any Performance Criteria has been attained, certain special or technical factors shall be ignored or, conversely, taken into account, in whole or in part, including but not limited to any one or more of the following factors:
(i)a gain, loss, income, or expense resulting from changes in generally accepted accounting principles that become effective during the applicable performance period or any previous period;
(ii)a gain, loss, income, or expense that is extraordinary in nature;
(iii)an impact of other specified nonrecurring events;
(iv)a gain or loss resulting from, and the direct expense incurred in connection with, the disposition of a business, in whole or in part, the sale of investments or non-core assets, or discontinued operations, categories, or segments of businesses;
(v)a gain or loss from claims and/or litigation and insurance recoveries relating to claims or litigation;
(vi)an impact of impairment of tangible or intangible assets;
(vii)an impact of restructuring activities, including, without limitation, reductions in force;
(viii)an impact of investments or acquisitions made during the applicable performance period or any prior period;
(ix)a loss from political and legal changes that impact operations, as a consequence of war, insurrection, riot, terrorism, confiscation, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, seizure, business interruption, or regulatory requirements;
(x)retained and uninsured losses from natural catastrophes;
(xi)currency fluctuations;
(xii)an expense relating to the issuance of stock options and/or other stock-based compensation;
(xiii)an expense relating to the early retirement of debt; and/or
(xiv)an impact of the conversion of convertible debt securities.
Each of the adjustments described above shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and standards in effect at the time the Award is made (without regard to changes thereafter), unless another objective method of measurement is designated by the Committee.
13.4Timing of Establishment of Criteria. Performance Criteria must be pre-established by the Committee. A Performance Criteria is considered pre-established if it is established in writing not later than 90 days after the commencement of the period of service to which the Performance Criteria relates, provided that the outcome is substantially uncertain at the time the Committee actually established the goal. However, in no event will a performance goal be considered pre-established if it is established after 25% of the period of service (as scheduled in good faith at the time the goal is established) has elapsed.

78




13.5Certification of Results. The Committee shall certify the performance results for the performance period specified in the Award Agreement after the performance period ends. The Committee shall determine the amount, if any, to be paid pursuant to each Award based on the achievement of the performance goals and the satisfaction of all other terms of the Award Agreement.
13.6Death, Disability or Other Circumstances. The Committee may provide in the Award Agreement that Awards under this Section 13 shall be payable, in whole or in part, in the event of the Participant’s death or Disability, a Change in Control or under other circumstances consistent with the Code Section 162(m) and Treasury Regulations thereunder.
SECTION 14
DEFERRALS
The Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of shares that would otherwise be due to the Participant in connection with any Award. The Committee shall establish rules and procedures for any such deferrals, consistent with applicable requirements of Code Section 409A.
SECTION 15
WITHHOLDING OF TAXES
15.1Required Withholding. All Awards under the Plan shall be subject to applicable federal (including FICA/Medicare), state and local tax withholding requirements. The Company may require that the Participant or other person receiving or exercising Awards pay to the Company the amount of any federal, state or local taxes that the Company is required to withhold with respect to such Awards, or the Company may deduct from other wages paid by the Company the amount of any withholding taxes due with respect to such Awards.
15.2Election to Withhold Shares. Unless the Committee otherwise prescribes in the Award Agreement, shares of Company Stock may be withheld to satisfy the Company’s tax withholding obligation with respect to Awards paid in Company Stock at the time such Awards become taxable, up to an amount that does not cause adverse accounting consequences or cost to the Company for federal (including FICA/Medicare), state and local tax liabilities.
15.3Default Withholding Procedures. Unless the Committee otherwise prescribes in the Award Agreement,any Participant or beneficiary may satisfy the withholding requirements that apply to such Award by using any one or more of the following methods or any combination of the following methods:
(a)by making a payment to the Company of an amount in cash (which shall be deemed to include payment in U.S. currency or by certified check, bank draft, cashier’s check, or money order) equal to the amount of such withholding requirements;
(b)by making a payment to the Company in shares of Company Stock which are previously owned by the Participant (or such other person) and that have a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of such withholding requirements;
(c)by having the Company retain shares of Company Stock which are otherwise being purchased or paid under the Award and have a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of such withholding requirements;
(d)by having the Company retain an amount of cash that is payable under the Award and equal to the amount of such withholding requirements; and/or
(e)by having the Company retain an amount of cash that is payable under any other compensation applicable to the Participant (or such other person) and equal to the amount of such withholding requirements.
15.4Right of Company To Retain Amounts To Meet Withholding Requirements. If any Participant (or other person) who is responsible for satisfying any payment/withholding requirements that apply to an Award fails to satisfy such payment/withholding requirements by making or electing a form of payment prior to exercise (in the case of an Option or SAR) or the date an Award is due to be paid, the Company shall have the right to retain from such Award or the payment thereof (or from any other amount that is payable as compensation to the Participant or such other person), as appropriate, a sufficient number of shares of Company Stock or cash otherwise applicable to the Award (or otherwise applicable to such other compensation amount) in order to satisfy such payment/withholding requirements.

79



SECTION 16
TRANSFERABILITY OF AWARDS
16.1Restrictions on Transfer. Except as described in Section 16.2 below, only the Participant may exercise rights under an Award during the Participant’s lifetime, and a Participant may not transfer those rights except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. When a Participant dies, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Participant may exercise such rights. Any such successor must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to receive the Award under the Participant’s will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution.
16.2Transfer of Nonqualified Stock Options to or for Family Members. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may provide in an Award Agreement that a Participant may transfer Nonqualified Stock Options to family members, or one or more trusts or other entities for the benefit of or owned by family members, consistent with applicable securities laws, according to such terms as the Committee may determine; provided that the Participant receives no consideration for the transfer of a Nonqualified Stock Option and the transferred Nonqualified Stock Option shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the Nonqualified Stock Option immediately before the transfer.
SECTION 17
CONSEQUENCES OF A CHANGE IN CONTROL
17.1Disposition of Awards in Connection with Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, the Company may continue, assume, or provide substitution for outstanding Awards in a manner that provides to Participants rights and economic value substantially proportionate to the rights and economic value of such Awards immediately before the Change in Control; provided, however, that no assumption or substitution shall be made to any Award unless, after such assumption or substitution, the assumed or substituted Award continues to be exempt from or in compliance with the requirements of Code Section 409A.
17.2Effect of Involuntary Termination of Employment within Twenty-Four Months Following Change in Control. If Awards granted under the Plan are continued or assumed or Awards are made in substitution (“Plan Awards”), and a Participant experiences an Involuntary Termination of Employment within 24 months following such Change in Control, then, with respect to Plan Awards that are still outstanding as of the date of such Participant’s termination of employment: (i) such Plan Awards that are Options or SARs shall become fully exercisable upon the date of the Participant’s termination of employment, (ii) the restrictions still then in force and applicable to restricted Company Stock under Plan Awards shall immediately lapse upon the date of the Participant’s termination of employment, (iii) the restrictions still then in force and applicable to Plan Awards that are time-vested Stock Units and Other Stock-Based Awards shall immediately lapse upon the date of the Participant’s termination of employment, and (iv) any outstanding Plan Awards that are Stock Unit, Other Stock-Based Award or Nonstock-Based Award that vests based on achievement of certain performance, shall be paid as of the date of the Participant’s termination of employment at the payment amount that was attainable (and not previously paid) under such Award if all performance goals and other criteria or conditions applicable to the Award were satisfied at 100% (but not more than 100%) of the “target” performance goal.
17.3Involuntary TerminationDefined. For purposes of this Section, a Participant shall be considered to have experienced an “Involuntary Termination of Employment” if and as of the date that (i) the Company terminates the Participant’s employment (when the Participant is willing and able to continue his or her employment with the Company) for any reason other than the Participant’s death, Disability, explicit or implicit request, fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement, or misconduct constituting serious criminal activity on the part of the Participant or (ii) the Participant terminates his or her employment with the Company because, without the Participant’s consent, there is (i) a material reduction by the Company in the Participant’s authority, reporting relationship, or responsibilities, (ii) there is a material reduction by the Company in the Participant’s compensation, or (iii) there is a material change in the Participant’s work location. 

80




17.4Vesting in Awards not Assumed, Continued or Substituted. If and to the extent that Awards granted under the Plan are not continued, assumed, or substituted as provided in Section 17.1 in the event of a Change in Control, then (i) outstanding Options and SARs shall immediately become exercisable in full upon the date of the Change in Control, (ii) the restrictions still then in force and applicable to any Company Stock awarded as restricted stock under the Plan to a Participant shall immediately lapse upon the date of the Change in Control, (iii) the time-based vesting conditions that are required to be met before the Participant vests in all of Stock Units, Other Stock-Based Award or Nonstock-Based Award that have not yet forfeited shall immediately be deemed satisfied upon the date of the Change in Control, and (iv) any outstanding Stock Unit, Other Stock-Based Award or Nonstock-Based Award that vests based on achievement of certain performance, and shall be distributable or payable as of the date of the Change in Control at the payment amount that was attainable (and not previously paid) under such Award if all performance goals and other criteria or conditions applicable to the Award were satisfied at 100% (but not more than 100%) of the “target” performance goal. With respect to any Awards which become vested and payable at Change in Control pursuant to this Section, the Company shall, within the 60-day period that begins on the date of the Change in Control, distribute to the Participant (or, in the event of his or her death before the payment, the executor, administrator, or other personal representative of his or her estate) the stock or cash issuable thereunder (but subject to the tax withholding requirements first being satisfied).
17.5Alternatively, Committee May Cash Out Awards. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 17.1, in the event of a Change in Control, the Committee shall have discretion to cause a cash payment to be made to a person who then holds an Option or SAR, in lieu of the right to exercise such Option or SAR or any portion thereof, and thereby to cause such Option or SAR to be canceled and terminated. In the event the Committee exercises its discretion to cause such cash payment to be made, the amount of such cash payment shall be equal to the amount (if any) by which (i) the aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of the Change in Control of the Company Stock that is subject to the Option or SAR exceeds (ii) the aggregate Exercise Price under such Option or SAR. If the aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of the Change in Control of the Company Stock that is subject to an Option or SAR is less than the aggregate Exercise Price, the Option or SAR shall be deemed to have been paid in full in lieu of the right to exercise such Option or SAR and the Option or SAR shall be canceled and terminated. Further, in the event of a Change in Control and with respect to any Stock Unit, Other Stock-Based Award that, as of the date of such Change in Control, would otherwise be payable in Company Stock, the Committee shall have discretion to cause the payment of such Award to be made in cash instead. In the event the Committee exercises its discretion to cause such cash payment to be made, the amount of such cash payment shall be equal to the aggregate Fair Market Value, on the date of the Change in Control, of the Company Stock that would otherwise then be payable under such Award.
17.6Terms Related to Change in Control. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the terms of any Award granted under the Plan shall not provide for the waiver of any employment condition, performance goal, or any otherwise applicable limitation, condition, or restriction (together for purposes of this Section, an “Award restriction”) due in whole or in part to a Change in Control, except to the extent provided under this Section 17. In this regard, the Committee may prescribe in terms of an applicable Award the specific manner in which the provisions of this Section 17 apply to the applicable Award, for instance by providing administrative rules related to payment in the event that the provisions of this Section 17 are put into effect, but the Committee shall not prescribe in the terms of an applicable Award any additional or alternative circumstances under which any Award restriction is waived due in whole or in part to the occurrence of a Change in Control.
SECTION 18
REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUANCE OF SHARES
No Company Stock shall be issued in connection with any Award hereunder unless and until all legal requirements applicable to the issuance of such Company Stock have been complied with to the satisfaction of the Committee. The Committee shall have the right to condition any Award made to any Participant hereunder on such Participant’s undertaking in writing to comply with such restrictions on his or her subsequent disposition of such shares of Company Stock as the Committee shall deem necessary or advisable. Any certificates issued representing such shares may be legended to reflect any such restrictions and any such shares held by the Company's transfer agent in book-entry form may reflect such restrictions. Shares of Company Stock issued under the Plan will be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as may be required by applicable laws, regulations and interpretations, including any requirement that a legend be placed on any certificate issued thereon. No Participant shall have any right as a shareholder with respect to Company Stock covered by an Award until shares have been issued to the Participant.

81




SECTION 19
AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
19.1Amendment. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that the Board shall not amend the Plan without approval of the shareholders of the Company if shareholder approval is required in order to comply with the Code or applicable laws or to comply with applicable stock exchange requirements. No amendment or termination of this Plan shall, without the consent of the Participant, materially impair any rights or obligations under any Award previously made to the Participant under the Plan, unless such right has been reserved in the Plan or the Award Agreement or except as provided in Section 20.2 below. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Board may amend the Plan in such manner as it deems appropriate in the event of a change in applicable law or regulations.
19.2No Repricing Without Shareholder Approval. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, except as authorized by Section 5.5, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or SARs or cancel outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for cash, other awards of Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs, without shareholder approval.
19.3Shareholder Approval for Qualified Performance-Based Compensation. If Awards are made under Section 13 above, the Performance Criteria must be reapproved by the Company’s shareholders no later than the first shareholders’ meeting that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which the shareholders previously approved the provisions of Section 13, if additional Awards are to be made under Section 13 and if required by Code Section 162(m) or Treasury Regulations thereunder.
SECTION 20
MISCELLANEOUS
20.1Effective Date. The Plan shall be effective as of the Effective Date, if approved by the Company’s shareholders on such date.
20.2Awards in Connection with Corporate Transactions and Otherwise. Nothing contained in this Plan shall be construed to (i) limit the right of the Committee to make Awards under this Plan in connection with the acquisition, by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation or otherwise, of the business or assets of any corporation, firm or association, including Awards to employees thereof who become Employees, or for other proper corporate purposes, or (ii) limit the right of the Company to grant stock options or make other stock-based awards outside of this Plan. Without limiting the foregoing, the Committee may make an Award to an employee of another corporation who becomes an Employee by reason of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or property, reorganization or liquidation involving the Company in substitution for a grant made by such corporation. The terms and conditions of the Awards may vary from the terms and conditions required by the Plan and from those of the substituted stock incentives, as determined by the Committee.
20.3Compliance with Law.
(a)The Plan, the exercise of Options and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Company Stock under Awards shall be subject to all applicable laws and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. With respect to persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, it is the intent of the Company that the Plan and all transactions under the Plan comply with all applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the Exchange Act. In addition, it is the intent of the Company that Incentive Stock Options comply with the applicable provisions of Code Section 422, and Awards of Qualified Performance-Based Compensation comply with the applicable provisions of Code Section 162(m). To the extent that any legal requirement of Section 16 of the Exchange Act or Code Sections 422 or 162(m) as set forth in the Plan ceases to be required under Section 16 of the Exchange Act or Code Section 422 or 162(m), that Plan provision shall cease to apply. The Committee may revoke any Award if it is contrary to law or modify an Award to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory government regulation. The Committee may also adopt rules regarding the withholding of taxes on payments to Participants. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, agree to limit its authority under this Section.

82




(b)The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A such that Awards hereunder will be exempt therefrom, or, if not so exempt, will comply with that section so as not to impose taxes on Participants prior to the receipt of value hereunder. Each Award shall be construed and administered such that the Award either (A) qualifies for an exemption from the requirements of Code Section 409A or (B) satisfies the requirements of Code Section 409A. If an Award is subject to Code Section 409A, (i) distributions shall only be made in a manner and upon an event permitted under Code Section 409A, (ii) payments to be made upon a termination of employment shall only be made upon a “separation from service” under Code Section 409A, (iii) unless the Award specifies otherwise, each installment payment shall be treated as a separate payment for purposes of Code Section 409A, and (iv) in no event shall a Participant, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year in which a distribution is made except in accordance with Code Section 409A.
(c)Any Award that is subject to Code Section 409A and that is to be distributed to a Key Employee (as described below) upon separation from service shall be administered so that any distribution with respect to such Award shall be postponed for six months following the date of the Participant’s separation from service, if required by Code Section 409A. If a distribution is delayed pursuant to Code Section 409A, the distribution shall be paid within 15 days after the end of the six-month period. If the Participant dies during such six-month period, any postponed amounts shall be paid within 90 days of the Participant’s death. The determination of Key Employees, including the number and identity of persons considered Key Employees and the identification date, shall be made by the Committee or its delegate each year in accordance with Code Section 416(i) and the “specified employee” requirements of Code Section 409A and consistent with other plans and programs of the Company to which such terms apply.
(d)Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, each Participant shall be solely responsible for the tax consequences of Awards under the Plan, and in no event shall the Company have any responsibility or liability if an Award does not meet any applicable requirements of Code Section 409A. Although the Company intends to administer the Plan to prevent adverse tax consequences under Code Section 409A, the Company does not represent or warrant that the Plan or any Award complies with any provision of federal, state, local or other tax law.
20.4Enforceability. The Plan shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Company and its successors and assigns.
20.5Funding of the Plan; Limitation on Rights. This Plan shall be unfunded. The Company shall not be required to establish any special or separate fund or to make any other segregation of assets to assure the payment of any Awards under this Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan and no action taken pursuant hereto shall create or be construed to create a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant or any other person. No Participant or any other person shall under any circumstances acquire any property interest in any specific assets of the Company. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payment from the Company hereunder, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.
20.6Rights of Participants. Nothing in this Plan shall entitle any Employee or other person to any claim or right to receive an Award under this Plan. Neither this Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any individual any rights to be retained by or in the employment of the Employer.
20.7No Fractional Shares. No fractional shares of Company Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, other awards or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
20.8Clawback Rights. All Awards under the Plan will be subject to any compensation, clawback and recoupment policies that may be applicable to the employees of the Company, as in effect from time to time and as approved by the Board or Committee, whether or not approved before or after the Effective Date.
20.9Governing Law. The validity, construction, interpretation and effect of the Plan and Award Agreements issued under the Plan shall be governed and construed by and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, without giving effect to the conflict of law provisions thereof.

83




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Plan has been adopted as of the Effective Date.
CINCINNATI BELL INC.
By:
Title:


84



Appendix II
CINCINNATI BELL INC.
2017 STOCK PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1    Effectiveness. As of the Effective Date (as defined below), the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”) is hereby established.
1.2    Purpose. The purposes of this Plan are to (i) attract and retain the services of experienced and knowledgeable persons to serve as independent directors of Cincinnati Bell Inc. (the “Company”) for the benefit of the Company and its shareholders, and (ii) to provide additional incentive for such directors to continue to work for the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
1.3    Effective Date and Duration of Plan. The Plan is effective on the Effective Date, as described in Section 2.10, and shall remain in effect until the earliest of (i) the date on which the Plan is terminated in accordance with Section 14.1, (ii) the date on which the maximum number of shares of Company Stock which may be issued or transferred under the Plan (as determined under Section 5 of the Plan) have been issued or transferred or (iii) May 3, 2027. After termination of the Plan, no Awards may be granted under the Plan but any Award granted under the Plan prior to the Plan’s termination shall remain outstanding in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the terms of the Award Agreement.
SECTION 2
DEFINITIONS
As used in the Plan, the following terms will have the respective meanings set forth below:
2.1    “Awardmeans an Option, Stock Unit or Stock Award granted under the Plan.
2.2     “Award Agreementmeans the written instrument (which may be in electronic form) that sets forth the terms and conditions of an Award, including all amendments thereto.
2.3    “Boardmeans the Company’s Board of Directors.
2.4    A “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have taken place for purposes of the Plan if
(a)a majority of the Board of the Company as of any date is not composed of Incumbent Directors. For purposes hereof, as of any date, the term “Incumbent Director” means any individual who is a director of the Company as of such date and either: (A) who was a director of the Company at the beginning of the 24 consecutive month period ending on such date or (B) who became a director subsequent to the beginning of such 24 consecutive month period and whose appointment, election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least two‑thirds of the directors who were, as of the date of such vote, Incumbent Directors (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director). It is provided, however, that no individual initially appointed, elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to directors or as a result of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall ever be deemed to be an Incumbent Director;
(b)any “person” (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d‑3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board (the “Company Voting Securities”); provided, however, that the event described in this paragraph (b) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control if such event results from any of the following: (A) the acquisition of any Company Voting Securities by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (B) the acquisition of any Company Voting Securities by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (C) the acquisition of any Company Voting Securities by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (D) a Non‑Qualifying Transaction (as defined in paragraph (c) of this Section 2.4);

85




(c)the consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries (a “Reorganization”) or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company to an entity that is not an affiliate of the Company (a “Sale”), that in each case requires the approval of the Company’s stockholders under the law of the Company’s jurisdiction of organization, whether for such Reorganization or Sale (or the issuance of securities of the Company in such Reorganization or Sale), unless immediately following such Reorganization or Sale: (A) more than 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of (x) the entity resulting from such Reorganization, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (in either case, the “Surviving Entity”), or (y) if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity (the “Parent Entity”), is represented by Company Voting Securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such Reorganization or Sale (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company Voting Securities were converted pursuant to such Reorganization or Sale), and such voting power among the holders thereof is in substantially the same proportion as the voting power of such Company Voting Securities among the holders thereof immediately prior to the Reorganization or Sale, (B) no person (other than any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Surviving Entity or the Parent Entity), is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the outstanding voting securities of the Parent Entity (or, if there is no Parent Entity, the Surviving Entity) and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors (or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Parent Entity (or, if there is no Parent Entity, the Surviving Entity) following the consummation of the Reorganization or Sale were, at the time of the approval by the Board of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Reorganization or Sale, Incumbent Directors (any Reorganization or Sale which satisfies all of the criteria specified in (A), (B) and (C) above being deemed to be a “Non‑Qualifying Transaction”); or
(d)the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company and the Company consummates such liquidation or dissolution.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control of the Company shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 30% of the Company Voting Securities as a result of the acquisition of Company Voting Securities by the Company which reduces the number of Company Voting Securities outstanding; provided that, if after such acquisition by the Company such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control of the Company shall then occur.
Also notwithstanding the foregoing, for any Awards subject to the requirements of Code Section 409A that will become payable on a Change in Control, the transaction constituting a “Change in Control” must also constitute a “change in control event” for purposes of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(v).
2.5    “Codemeans the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as interpreted in Treasury Regulations or other guidance.
2.6    “Companymeans Cincinnati Bell Inc.
2.7    “Company Stockmeans the common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, or any stock or other securities of the Company hereafter issued or issuable in substitution or exchange for the common stock.
2.8    “Disabilityor Disabledmeans, with respect to an Outside Director, that the Outside Director is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve months. The Outside Director’s Disability shall be determined under procedures established by the Board. Further, if an Outside Director fails to reasonably cooperate with the Board’s attempt to determine whether he or she is disabled, then, notwithstanding any other evidence of disability that exists, the Board shall have the right to determine that no condition of Disability exists as to the Outside Director.
2.9    Dividend Equivalentmeans an amount calculated with respect to a Stock Unit, which is determined by multiplying the number of shares of Company Stock subject to the Stock Unit by the per-share cash dividend, or the per-share fair market value (as determined by the Board) of any dividend in consideration other than cash, paid by the Company on its Company Stock. If interest is credited on accumulated dividend equivalents, the term “Dividend Equivalent” shall include the accrued interest.
2.10    “Effective Date” of the Plan means May 4, 2017, provided that the Plan is approved by the shareholders of the Company on that date.

86



2.11    “Exchange Actmeans the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2.12    “Exercise Pricemeans the per share price at which shares of Company Stock may be purchased under an Option, as designated by the Board.
2.13    “Fair Market Valueof Company Stock means, (i) if the principal trading market for the Company Stock is a national securities exchange, the last reported sale price of Company Stock during regular trading hours on the relevant date or, if there were no trades on that date, the last reported sale price of Company Stock during regular trading hours on the next following date upon which a sale is reported, (ii) if the Company Stock is not principally traded on such exchange, the mean between the last reported “bid” and “asked” prices of Company Stock on the relevant date, as reported on the over the counter market, or (iii) if the Company Stock is not publicly traded or, if publicly traded, is not so reported, the Fair Market Value per share shall be as determined by the Board.
2.14    “Nonqualified Stock Optionmeans an Option that is not intended to be taxed as an incentive stock option under Code Section 422.
2.15    “Optionmeans an option to purchase shares of Company Stock, as described in Section 6.
2.16    “Outside Directormeans any member of the Board who is not an employee (on an employee payroll) of the Company.
2.17    “Planmeans this Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as may be amended from time to time.
2.18“Retirement” means, with respect to any Outside Director, the Outside Director's ceasing to be an Outside Director after he or she has attained at least age 68.
2.19    “Stock Awardmeans an Award of Company Stock as described in Section 8.
2.20    “Stock Unitmeans an Award of a phantom unit representing one share of Company Stock, as described in Section 7, which may include but not be limited to a Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”), as described in Section 7.
2.21    “Treasury Regulations” means regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury under the Code.
SECTION 3
ADMINISTRATION
3.1    Board of Directors. The Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Board.
3.2    Board Authority. The Board shall have the sole and complete authority to grant awards to Outside Directors in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 hereof and, subject to the limitations and other provisions of the Plan, to interpret the Plan, to adopt, amend, and rescind administrative guidelines and other rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and to make all other determinations and to take all other actions it deems necessary or advisable for the proper administration of the Plan.
3.3    Board Determinations. Except to the extent otherwise required by applicable law, the Board’s determinations on any matter within its authority shall be conclusive and binding on the Company, all Outside Directors, and all other parties.
3.4    Liability; Indemnification. No member of the Board shall be personally liable for any action, interpretation or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or Awards granted hereunder, and each member of the Board shall be fully indemnified and protected by the Company with respect to any liability the Board member may incur with respect to any such action, interpretation or determination, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.

87



SECTION 4
AWARDS; MINIMUM VESTING
The Board may, in its discretion, grant under the Plan Options, Stock Units and Stock Awards to any Outside Director on the first date of such individual's first term of office as an Outside Director and/or on the date of any annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company. The Board shall exercise its discretion when determining whether to grant any such Awards as of any such date with the intent that the Awards that are granted to Outside Directors under the Plan, together with other compensation that is either paid in the form of Company Stock or has its value determined in relation to the value of Company Stock (such awards and such other compensation referred to in this Section 4 as “equity-based compensation”) and taking into account the Fair Market Value of Company Stock when granting or providing such equity-based compensation, provide equity-based compensation for Outside Directors that each year is approximately equal to the median level of the value of equity-based compensation provided by a group of comparable peer group companies to their non-employee directors.
All Awards shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate and as are specified in writing by the Board to the Outside Director in the Award Agreement. By acceptance of the Award, an Outside Director acknowledges that all decisions and determinations of the Board shall be final and binding on the Outside Director, his or her beneficiaries and any other person having or claiming an interest under such Award.
Notwithstanding the Board’s discretion granted under the Plan to determine the vesting provisions applicable to an Award, the vesting provisions shall, in all events, be subject to the provisions of this Section 4. Subject to the immediately following sentence, the vesting period of any Award shall be a minimum of one year from the date of grant (or, if earlier, the first annual meeting of Company shareholders after the date on which the Award is granted, provided that such date is no more than two weeks before the one year anniversary of the date of grant). Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Award Agreement may provide for vesting to occur upon the Participant’s death, Disability, Retirement or, subject to the limitations contained herein, in the event of a Change in Control.
SECTION 5
SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN; AWARD LIMITS
5.1    Shares Authorized. Subject to adjustment as described below in Section 5.4, the total aggregate number of shares of Company Stock that may be issued or transferred under the Plan shall be 350,000.
5.2    Share Counting. Upon grant of an Award, the shares of Company Stock reserved for issuance under this Plan pursuant to Section 5.1 shall be debited for the maximum number of shares of Company Stock that might be issuable under an Award. If and to the extent Options granted under the Plan terminate, expire, or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised, and if and to the extent that any Stock Awards or Stock Units are forfeited or terminated, or otherwise are not paid in full, the shares to that extent that are reserved for such Awards shall again be available for purposes of the Plan. If shares of Company Stock otherwise issuable under the Plan are surrendered in payment of the Exercise Price of an Option, then the number of shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be permanently reduced by the gross number of shares as to which such Option is exercised. If shares of Company Stock otherwise issuable under the Plan are withheld by the Company in satisfaction of the withholding taxes incurred in connection with the issuance, vesting or exercise of any Award or the issuance of Company Stock thereunder, then the number of shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be permanently reduced by the number of shares used to cover the tax withholding. Example: 100 shares are issuable, but 40 of them are withheld to pay income taxes; the number of shares issuable under the Plan remain permanently reduced by 100 shares. To the extent that any Awards are payable only in cash, and not in shares of Company Stock, such Awards shall not count against the share limits in Section 5.1.
5.3    Source of Shares. Shares issued or transferred under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Company Stock or reacquired shares of Company Stock, including shares purchased by the Company on the open market for purposes of the Plan.

88




5.4    Adjustments. If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of Company Stock outstanding (i) by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split, or combination or exchange of shares, (ii) by reason of a merger, reorganization or consolidation, (iii) by reason of a reclassification or change in par value, or (iv) by reason of any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding Company Stock as a class without the Company’s receipt of consideration, or if the value of outstanding shares of Company Stock is substantially reduced as a result of a spinoff or the Company’s payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the maximum number of shares of Company Stock available for issuance under the Plan, the maximum number of shares of Company Stock for which any individual may receive Awards in any year, the kind and number of shares covered by outstanding Awards, or the kind and number of shares issued or transferred and to be issued or transferred under the Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such Awards shall be equitably adjusted by the Board, in such manner as the Board deems appropriate, to reflect any increase or decrease in the number of, or change in the kind or value of, the issued shares of Company Stock to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of rights and benefits under the Plan and such outstanding Awards; provided, however, that any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment shall be rounded down to the nearest whole share. In addition, in the event of a Change in Control of the Company, the provisions of Section 12 of the Plan shall apply. Any adjustments to outstanding Awards shall be consistent with Code Section 409A or 424, to the extent applicable. Any adjustments determined by the Board shall be final, binding and conclusive.
5.5    Limitation on Awards in Any Calendar Year. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the aggregate grant date fair value (determined in accordance with applicable financial accounting rules) of all Awards granted under the Plan to any Outside Director in any calendar year shall not exceed $300,000.
SECTION 6
OPTIONS
6.1    General Requirements. The Board may grant Options to an Outside Director upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate under this Section 6. The Board shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock that will be subject to each Award of Options.
6.2    Type of Option, Price and Term.
(a)    The Board may grant Nonqualified Stock Options, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
(b)    The Exercise Price of Company Stock subject to an Option shall be determined by the Board and shall be equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock on the date the Option is granted.
(c)    The Board shall determine the term of each Option, which shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant.
6.3    Exercisability of Options.
(a)    Options shall become exercisable in accordance with such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Board and specified in the Award Agreement. The Board may accelerate the exercisability of any or all outstanding Options at any time for any reason.
(b)    The Board may provide in an Award Agreement that the Outside Director may elect to exercise part or all of an Option before it otherwise has become exercisable. Any shares so purchased shall be restricted shares and shall be subject to a repurchase right in favor of the Company during a specified restriction period, with the repurchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the Exercise Price or (ii) the Fair Market Value of such shares at the time of repurchase, or such other restrictions as the Board deems appropriate.
6.4    Termination of Service. Except as provided in the Award Agreement, an Option may only be exercised while the Outside Director is still an Outside Director. The Board shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances and during what time periods an Outside Director may exercise an Option after termination of service as an Outside Director.

89




6.5    Exercise of Options. An Outside Director may exercise an Option that has become exercisable, in whole or in part, by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company. The Outside Director shall pay the Exercise Price for the Option by one or a combination of the following methods: (i) in cash, (ii) by delivering shares of Company Stock owned by the Outside Director and having a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price or by attestation to ownership of shares of Company Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Exercise Price, (iii) by payment through a broker in accordance with procedures permitted by the Board, (iv) unless the Award Agreement provides to the contrary, by net exercise of all or any part of the vested shares of Company Stock for which the Option is exercisable by the Company retaining Company Stock that would otherwise be issued on exercise equal to the dollar amount by which the then Fair Market Value of the shares of Company Stock subject to the surrendered portion exceeds the aggregate Exercise Price payable for those shares, or (v) by such other method as the Board may approve, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Shares of Company Stock used to exercise an Option shall have been held by the Outside Director for the requisite period of time to avoid adverse accounting consequences to the Company with respect to the Option. Payment for the shares pursuant to the Option, and any required withholding taxes, must be received by the time specified by the Board depending on the type of payment being made, but in all cases prior to the issuance of the Company Stock for such exercise.
SECTION 7
STOCK UNITS
7.1    General Requirements. The Board may grant Stock Units upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate under this Section 7. Each Stock Unit shall represent the right of the Outside Director to receive a share of Company Stock or an amount based on the value of a share of Company Stock. All Stock Units shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan.
7.2    Terms of Stock Units. The Board may grant Stock Units that are payable on terms and conditions determined by the Board, which may include payment after a specified additional period of service as an Outside Director for vesting (a type of Award commonly referred to a “Restricted Stock Units,” or “RSUs”). Stock Units may be paid at the end of a specified time for vesting, or payment may be deferred to a date authorized by the Board. The Board shall determine the number of Stock Units to be granted and the requirements applicable to such Stock Units.
7.3    Payment With Respect to Stock Units. Payment with respect to Stock Units shall be made in cash, in Company Stock, or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Board. The Award Agreement shall specify the maximum number of shares that can be issued under the Stock Units.
7.4    Requirement of Service. The Board shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances an Outside Director may retain Stock Units after termination of the Outside Director’s service as an Outside Director and the circumstances under which Stock Units may be forfeited.
7.5    Dividend Equivalents. The Board may grant Dividend Equivalents in connection with Stock Units, under such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate. Dividend Equivalents may be paid to Outside Directors currently or may be deferred. All Dividend Equivalents that are not paid currently shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan. Dividend Equivalents may be accrued as a cash obligation, or may be converted to additional Stock Units for the Outside Director, and deferred Dividend Equivalents may accrue interest, all as determined by the Board. Dividend Equivalents may be payable in cash or shares of Company Stock or in a combination of the two, as determined by the Board.
SECTION 8
STOCK AWARDS
8.1    General Requirements. The Board may issue shares of Company Stock to an Outside Director under a Stock Award, upon such terms and conditions as the Board deems appropriate under this Section 8. Shares of Company Stock issued pursuant to Stock Awards may be issued for cash consideration or for no cash consideration, and subject to restrictions or no restrictions, as determined by the Board. The Board may establish conditions under which restrictions on Stock Awards shall lapse over a period of time or according to such other criteria as the Board deems appropriate. The Board shall determine the number of shares of Company Stock to be issued pursuant to a Stock Award.
8.2    Requirement of Service. The Board shall determine in the Award Agreement under what circumstances an Outside Director may retain Stock Awards after termination of the Outside Director’s service as an Outside Director and the circumstances under which Stock Awards may be forfeited.

90



8.3    Restrictions on Transfer. For any period when Stock Awards are subject to restrictions, an Outside Director may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares of a Stock Award except upon death as described in Section 11.1. If certificates are issued, each certificate for a share of a Stock Award shall contain a legend giving appropriate notice of the restrictions in the Award. Shares of a Stock Award that are held at the Company's transfer agent in book-entry form shall contain the appropriate restrictions related to the transfer of such shares. When all restrictions on a share of a Stock Award have lapsed, either the Company shall remove the legend from the issued certificate or the transfer agent shall remove the restrictions from the book-entry, as applicable. The Company may retain possession of any certificates for Stock Awards until all restrictions on such shares have lapsed.
8.4    Right to Vote and to Receive Dividends. The Board shall determine to what extent, and under what conditions, the Outside Director shall have the right to vote shares of Stock Awards and to receive any dividends or other distributions paid on such shares during the restriction period. The Board may determine that dividends on Stock Awards shall be withheld while the Stock Awards are subject to restrictions and that the dividends shall be payable only upon the lapse of the restrictions on the Stock Awards, or on such other terms as the Board determines. Dividends that are not paid currently shall be credited to bookkeeping accounts on the Company’s records for purposes of the Plan. Accumulated dividends may accrue interest, as determined by the Board, and shall be paid in cash, shares of Company Stock, or in such other form as dividends are paid on Company Stock, as determined by the Board.
SECTION 9
DEFERRALS
The Board may permit or require an Outside Director to defer receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of shares that would otherwise be due to the Outside Director in connection with any Award. The Board shall establish rules and procedures for any such deferrals, consistent with applicable requirements of Code Section 409A.
SECTION 10
WITHHOLDING OF TAXES
10.1    Required Withholding. All Awards under the Plan shall be subject to applicable federal state and local tax withholding requirements. The Company may require that the Outside Director or other person receiving or exercising Awards pay to the Company the amount of any federal, state or local taxes that the Company is required to withhold with respect to such Awards, or the Company may deduct from other wages paid by the Company the amount of any withholding taxes due with respect to such Awards.
10.2    Election to Withhold Shares. Unless the Board otherwise prescribes in the Award Agreement, shares of Company Stock may be withheld to satisfy the Company’s tax withholding obligation with respect to Awards paid in Company Stock at the time such Awards become taxable, up to an amount that does not cause adverse accounting consequences or cost to the Company for federal, state and local tax liabilities.
10.3    Default Withholding Procedures. Unless the Board otherwise prescribes in the Award Agreement,any Outside Director or beneficiary may satisfy the withholding requirements that apply to such Award by using any one or more of the following methods or any combination of the following methods:
(a)    by making a payment to the Company of an amount in cash (which shall be deemed to include payment in U.S. currency or by certified check, bank draft, cashier’s check, or money order) equal to the amount of such withholding requirements;
(b)    by making a payment to the Company in shares of Company Stock which are previously owned by the Outside Director (or such other person) and that have a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of such withholding requirements;
(c)    by having the Company retain shares of Company Stock which are otherwise being purchased or paid under the Award and have a Fair Market Value on the date of payment equal to the amount of such withholding requirements;
(d)    by having the Company retain an amount of cash that is payable under the Award and equal to the amount of such withholding requirements; and/or
(e)by having the Company retain an amount of cash that is payable under any other compensation applicable to the Outside Director (or such other person) and equal to the amount of such withholding requirements.

91




10.4    Right of Company To Retain Amounts To Meet Withholding Requirements. If any Outside Director (or other person) who is responsible for satisfying any payment/withholding requirements that apply to an Award fails to satisfy such payment/withholding requirements by making or electing a form of payment prior to exercise (in the case of an Option) or the date an Award is due to be paid, the Company shall have the right to retain from such Award or the payment thereof (or from any other amount that is payable as compensation to the Outside Director or such other person), as appropriate, a sufficient number of shares of Company Stock or cash otherwise applicable to the Award (or otherwise applicable to such other compensation amount) in order to satisfy such payment/withholding requirements.
SECTION 11
TRANSFERABILITY OF AWARDS
11.1    Restrictions on Transfer. Except as described in Section 11.2 below, only the Outside Director may exercise rights under an Award during the Outside Director’s lifetime, and an Outside Director may not transfer those rights except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. When an Outside Director dies, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Outside Director may exercise such rights. Any such successor must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to receive the Award under the Outside Director’s will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution.
11.2    Transfer of Nonqualified Stock Options to or for Family Members. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may provide in an Award Agreement that an Outside Director may transfer Nonqualified Stock Options to family members, or one or more trusts or other entities for the benefit of or owned by family members, consistent with applicable securities laws, according to such terms as the Board may determine; provided that the Outside Director receives no consideration for the transfer of a Nonqualified Stock Option and the transferred Nonqualified Stock Option shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the Nonqualified Stock Option immediately before the transfer.
SECTION 12
CONSEQUENCES OF A CHANGE IN CONTROL
12.1    Disposition of Awards in Connection with Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, the Company may continue, assume, or provide substitution for outstanding Awards in a manner that provides to Outside Directors rights and economic value substantially proportionate to the rights and economic value of such Awards immediately before the Change in Control; provided, however, that no assumption or substitution shall be made to any Award unless, after such assumption or substitution, the assumed or substituted Award continues to be exempt from or in compliance with the requirements of Code Section 409A.
12.2    Vesting in Awards not Assumed, Continued or Substituted. If and to the extent that Awards granted under the Plan are not continued, assumed, or substituted as provided in Section 12.1 in the event of a Change in Control, then (i) outstanding Options shall immediately become exercisable in full upon the date of the Change in Control, (ii) the restrictions still then in force and applicable to any Company Stock awarded as restricted stock under the Plan to an Outside Director shall immediately lapse upon the date of the Change in Control, and (iii) the time-based vesting conditions that are required to be met before the Outside Director vests in all of Stock Units that have not yet forfeited shall immediately be deemed satisfied upon the date of the Change in Control. With respect to any Awards which become vested and payable at a Change in Control pursuant to this Section, the Company shall, within the 60-day period that begins on the date of the Change in Control, distribute to the Outside Director (or, in the event of his or her death before the payment, the executor, administrator, or other personal representative of his or her estate) the stock or cash issuable thereunder (but subject to the tax withholding requirements first being satisfied).
12.3    Alternatively, Board May Cash Out Awards. In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 12.1, in the event of a Change in Control, the Board shall have discretion to cause a cash payment to be made to a person who then holds an Option, in lieu of the right to exercise such Option or any portion thereof, and thereby to cause such Option to be canceled and terminated. In the event the Board exercises its discretion to cause such cash payment to be made, the amount of such cash payment shall be equal to the amount (if any) by which (i) the aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of the Change in Control of the Company Stock that is subject to the Option exceeds (ii) the aggregate Exercise Price under such Option. If the aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of the Change in Control of the Company Stock that is subject to an Option is less than the aggregate Exercise Price, the Option shall be deemed to have been paid in full in lieu of the right to exercise such Option and the Option shall be canceled and terminated. Further, in the event of a Change in Control and with respect to any Stock Unit Award that, as of the date of such Change in Control, would otherwise be payable in Company Stock, the Board shall have discretion to cause the payment of such Award to be made in cash instead. In the event the Board exercises its discretion to cause such cash payment to be made, the amount of such cash payment shall be equal to the aggregate Fair Market Value, on the date of the Change in Control, of the Company Stock that would otherwise then be payable under such Award.

92



12.4    Terms Related to Change in Control. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the terms of any Award granted under the Plan shall not provide for the waiver of any otherwise applicable limitation, condition, or restriction (together for purposes of this Section, an “Award Restriction”) due in whole or in part to a Change in Control, except to the extent provided under this Section 12. In this regard, the Board may prescribe in terms of an applicable Award the specific manner in which the provisions of this Section 12 apply to the applicable Award, for instance by providing administrative rules related to payment in the event that the provisions of this Section 12 are put into effect, but the Board shall not prescribe in the terms of an applicable Award any additional or alternative circumstances under which any Award restriction is waived due in whole or in part to the occurrence of a Change in Control.
SECTION 13
REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUANCE OF SHARES
No Company Stock shall be issued in connection with any Award hereunder unless and until all legal requirements applicable to the issuance of such Company Stock have been complied with to the satisfaction of the Board. The Board shall have the right to condition any Award made to any Outside Director hereunder on such Outside Director’s undertaking in writing to comply with such restrictions on his or her subsequent disposition of such shares of Company Stock as the Board shall deem necessary or advisable. Any certificates issued representing such shares may be legended to reflect any such restrictions and such shares held by the Company's transfer agent in book-entry form may reflect such restrictions. Shares of Company Stock issued under the Plan will be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as may be required by applicable laws, regulations and interpretations, including any requirement that a legend be placed on any certificate issued thereon. No Outside Director shall have any right as a shareholder with respect to Company Stock covered by an Award until shares have been issued to the Outside Director.
SECTION 14
AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN
14.1    Amendment. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that the Board shall not amend the Plan without approval of the shareholders of the Company if shareholder approval is required in order to comply with the Code or applicable laws or to comply with applicable stock exchange requirements. No amendment or termination of this Plan shall, without the consent of the Outside Director, materially impair any rights or obligations under any Award previously made to the Outside Director under the Plan, unless such right has been reserved in the Plan or the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Board may amend the Plan in such manner as it deems appropriate in the event of a change in applicable law or regulations.
14.2    No Repricing Without Shareholder Approval. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, except as authorized by Section 5.4, the terms of outstanding Awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or cancel outstanding Options in exchange for cash, or other awards of Options with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options, without shareholder approval.
SECTION 15
MISCELLANEOUS
15.1    Effective Date. The Plan shall be effective as of the Effective Date, if approved by the Company’s shareholders on such date.
15.2    Compliance with Law.
(a)    The Plan, the exercise of Options and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Company Stock under Awards shall be subject to all applicable laws and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. With respect to persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, it is the intent of the Company that the Plan and all transactions under the Plan comply with all applicable provisions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the Exchange Act. To the extent that any legal requirement of Section 16 of the Exchange Act cease to be required under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, that Plan provision shall cease to apply. The Board may revoke any Award if it is contrary to law or modify an Award to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory government regulation. The Board may also adopt rules regarding the withholding of taxes on payments to Outside Directors. The Board may, in its sole discretion, agree to limit its authority under this Section.

93




(b)    The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A such that Awards hereunder will be exempt therefrom, or, if not so exempt, will comply with that section so as not to impose taxes on Outside Directors prior to the receipt of value hereunder. Each Award shall be construed and administered such that the Award either (i) qualifies for an exemption from the requirements of Code Section 409A or (ii) satisfies the requirements of Code Section 409A. If an Award is subject to Code Section 409A, (i) distributions shall only be made in a manner and upon an event permitted under Code Section 409A, (ii) payments to be made upon a termination of service shall only be made upon a “separation from service” under Code Section 409A, (iii) unless the Award specifies otherwise, each installment payment shall be treated as a separate payment for purposes of Code Section 409A, and (iv) in no event shall an Outside Director, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year in which a distribution is made except in accordance with Code Section 409A.
(c)    Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, each Outside Director shall be solely responsible for the tax consequences of Awards under the Plan, and in no event shall the Company have any responsibility or liability if an Award does not meet any applicable requirements of Code Section 409A. Although the Company intends to administer the Plan to prevent adverse tax consequences under Code Section 409A, the Company does not represent or warrant that the Plan or any Award complies with any provision of federal, state, local or other tax law.
15.3    Enforceability. The Plan shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Company and its successors and assigns.
15.4    Funding of the Plan; Limitation on Rights. This Plan shall be unfunded. The Company shall not be required to establish any special or separate fund or to make any other segregation of assets to assure the payment of any Awards under this Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan and no action taken pursuant hereto shall create or be construed to create a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Outside Director or any other person. No Outside Director or any other person shall under any circumstances acquire any property interest in any specific assets of the Company. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payment from the Company hereunder, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.
15.5    Rights of Outside Directors. Nothing in this Plan shall entitle any Outside Director or other person to any claim or right to receive an Award under this Plan. Neither this Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any individual any rights to continued service as an Outside Director.
15.6    No Fractional Shares. No fractional shares of Company Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Board shall determine whether cash, other awards or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
15.7    Clawback Rights. All Awards under the Plan will be subject to any compensation, clawback and recoupment policies that may be applicable to the employees or directors of the Company, as in effect from time to time and as approved by the Board, whether or not approved before or after the Effective Date.
15.8    Governing Law. The validity, construction, interpretation and effect of the Plan and Award Agreements issued under the Plan shall be governed and construed by and determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, without giving effect to the conflict of law provisions thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Plan has been adopted as of the Effective Date.
CINCINNATI BELL INC.

By:
Title:



94



VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

CINCINNATI BELL INC.

ATTN: CONNIE M. VOGT

221 EAST 4TH FOURTH STREET, 103-1090

CINCINNATI, OH 45202-2301

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information untilinformation.  Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, May 3, 2017.EDT, on September 21, 2020 for shares held in a Plan and by 11:59 p.m., EDT, on September 23, 2020 for shares held directly. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions untilinstructions.  Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, May 3, 2017.EDT, on September 21, 2020 for shares held in a Plan and by 11:59 p.m., EDT, on September 23, 2020 for shares held directly. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Please mail the proxy card to allow delivery prior to the meeting date.



TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

M84523-P60786-Z64914

E23758-P87293-Z69455

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR  RECORDS

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION  ONLY


CINCINNATI BELL INC.

  The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each nominee:

1. Election of Directors for one-year terms expiring in 2018.

2021.

Nominees:

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

1a. Phillip R. Cox

Meredith J. Ching

o

o

o

The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal:1 YEAR2 YEARS3 YEARSAbstain
1b. John W. Eck
ooo2. Recommendation, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the frequency of the advisory vote regarding our executive officers' compensation.oooo

1c. Jakki L. Haussler
ooo

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 3, 4, 52 and 6.3.

For

Against

Abstain


1d. Craig F. Maier

o

o

o

1b. Walter A. Dods, Jr.

3.

o

o

o

2. Approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of our executive officers' compensation.

o

o

o


1e. Russel P. Mayer

o

oo


1c. John W. Eck

4. Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

o

o

o

o

o

1f. Lynn A. Wentworth

ooo
5. Approval of the Cincinnati Bell Inc. 2017 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors.ooo
1g. Martin J. Yudkovitzooo
6.

3. Ratification of our Audit and Finance Committee's appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2020.

o

o

o

o

1h. John M. Zrno


1d. Leigh R. Fox

o

o

o


1e. Jakki L. Haussler

1i. Theodore H. Torbeck

o

o

o

o

NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

1f. Craig F. Maier

o

o

o

1g. Russel P. Mayer

o

o

o

1h. Theodore H. Torbeck

o

o

o

1i. Lynn A. Wentworth

o

o

o

1j.  Martin J. Yudkovitz

o

o

o

NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice &and Proxy Statement, Form 10-K and Form 10-K10-K/A Wrap are available at www.proxyvote.com.


CINCINNATI BELL INC.

SOLICITATION OF PROXY

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2017

SEPTEMBER 24, 2020

The undersigned hereby appoints Phillip R. Cox,Lynn A. Wentworth, Jakki L. Haussler and Craig F. Maier, each or any of them, as proxies, with full power of substitution, to represent and to vote all common shares and 63/4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares of Cincinnati Bell Inc. held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on March 6, 2017,July 27, 2020, at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, notice of which Annual Meeting together with the related proxy statement has been received. The proxies are directed to vote the shares as indicated on the reverse side.

THIS PROXY CARD, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE BUT THE CARD IS SIGNED, THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL NOMINEES UNDER PROPOSAL 1, FOR "1 YEAR" UNDER"FOR" PROPOSAL 2 "FOR" PROPOSAL 3, "FOR" PROPOSAL 4, "FOR" PROPOSAL 5 AND "FOR" PROPOSAL 6,3, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.

(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed on the other side)


63